Where?

Why?

Now?

DrMaddVibe wrote:

I highly recommend it.... 👍

DrafterX wrote:

Where? Israel, Canada, U.S. and other more tolerant countries where their educations and skills are in demand- if of working age.

rfenst wrote:

Why? Bad anti-semitism and continualy elevatingd violence against the remaining jewish population over the last decade or longer.

rfenst wrote:

Now? Already has been happening for a while. The jews who have stayed are primarily retired.

rfenst wrote:

BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!!!
Yeah, lets go to a place where the PLO lobs rockets on top of our heads and the Muslim Brotherhood is taking over every nation we're meddling with!!!!!
Canada? Why would THEY want them?
US? LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!
Tolerant? We're a freaking police state!
Bad...as opposed to good?
France was (at least under Sarkozy) cracking down on radical Islam. Now that lid has been ripped off.
So, they're going to leave their paid off homes...kids, grandkids and whatever security they've built up for a chance to "start over"?
How freaking pathetic. Don't fix the place around you...Nooooooo! Just pick up your mattress and move and take all those problems with you...yeaaaaa! Give me a break.
Masada was all for naught!

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Someone please tell me they are making the French womens shave their pits.........

matchew wrote:

What the hell is wrong with you?

rfenst wrote:

What the hell is wrong with you?

rfenst wrote:

Nothing at all.

Refugee Shift


The State Department has officially recognized more than 5 million Palestinian refugees, a startling policy shift that jeopardizes the future of the Israeli Palestinian peace process.

Foreign Policy’s Josh Rogin reports:

The U.S. government considers the descendants of Palestinian refugees to be refugees, a State Department official told The Cable, and another top State Department official wrote in a letter to Congress that there are now 5 million Palestinian refugees.

Rogin’s revelation comes on the heels of a hotly contested Senate amendment aimed at finding exactly how many Palestinian refugees are benefiting from U.S. tax dollars. It would require the State Department to report on how many Palestinian refugees actually lived in Palestine from 1946-1948 and were displaced by the regional conflict and how many are descendants of these persons.

Rogin highlights a letter from Deputy Secretary of State Tom Nides opposing the amendment:

But later down in the letter, Nides states, “UNRWA provides essential services for approximatelyfive million refugees, including education for over 485,000 school children, primary health care in 138 clinics, and social services for the most Vulnerable, particularly in Lebanon and Gaza.” (Emphasis added.)

To experts and congressional officials following the issue, that declaration was remarkable because it was the first time the State Department had placed a number — 5 million — on the number of Palestinian refugees.

“The Nides letter could be considered a change in U.S. policy with consideration to refugees because it states clearly that 5 million people served by UNRWA are refugees,” one senior GOP Senate aide told The Cable. “For the Obama administration to stake out a position emphatically endorsing the rights of 5 million Palestinian refugees is by itself prejudging the outcome of final- status issues.”

http://freebeacon.com/refugee-shift/ 

Now there's some Change you can believe in!

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Perhaps, but the actual number has always been de facto Now, perhaps, it is to become de jure from the U.S. perspective. Anyway, it is just further emphasis that there id no one state solution- which I think everyone knows. Obama probably won't adopt such a perspective. He's got an election he wants to win and needs the Jewish vote- historically upwards of as much as 10% of the national vote- need to be appeased by him. Besides, you know the Israelis won't listen to anyone about peace settlement, especially Obama. They will be waiting to see what Romney has to say...

rfenst wrote:

Perhaps, but the actual number has always been de facto Now, perhaps, it is to become de jure from the U.S. perspective. Anyway, it is just further emphasis that there id no one state solution- which I think everyone knows. Obama probably won't adopt such a perspective. He's got an election he wants to win and needs the Jewish vote- historically upwards of as much as 10% of the national vote- need to be appeased by him. Besides, you know the Israelis won't listen to anyone about peace settlement, especially Obama. They will be waiting to see what Romney has to say...

rfenst wrote:

DMV- IMHO, the perception among many jews, latinos, blacks, disenfranchised groups (gays, feminists, one legged pagans, etc.), union folk and even soccer moms is that the Democrat party will level the playing field & allow all minions to partake equally in the spoils. It's human nature to want to get a share of what is perceived to be that of a few privileged who haven't truly earned it the hard way.

bloody spaniard wrote: