SammyETN
13 years ago

Funny thing is, chick fil-a is not being accused of discrimination.

The owner simply stated in an interview that he believes in the traditional (biblical) family.

tailgater wrote:




Which one does he support?

1) Polygamous - David had many wives, Jacob had four and Solomon had over seven hundred.

2) Levirate - Man must marry his widowed sister-in-law. Deut. 25: 5-10

3)Prisoner of War - Kill every one except the female vigins in wartime then make them your wives. Numbers 31: 1-18

4) Slave - Exodus 21: 1-6



Wait, I have no pictures, so I guess this doesn't count. Never mind.#-o
BuckyB93
13 years ago

I was reading the op-ed page this morning in the Chicago Trib, where are the lawyers and AG's?
The company has not been blamed for any hiring discrimination, just an opinion of its owner, does that mean that a Chicago alderman can stop the building of a church, mosque and temple too because of their stand on this same issue?What a bunch of BS, not to mention all the jobs the guy has now denied his community.
Chicago style, what a way to live...

AND I ate at one last week, extra pickles and one mayo, fabulous!

itsawaldo wrote:




Actually, in Boston it means that a mosque can be built with the help of taxpayer's money.

http://michaelgraham.com/archives/mayor-menino-donated-tax-dollars-to-ldquo-homophobic-rdquo-group-in-boston/ 

Menino is a d-bag
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Which one does he support?

1) Polygamous - David had many wives, Jacob had four and Solomon had over seven hundred.

2) Levirate - Man must marry his widowed sister-in-law. Deut. 25: 5-10

3)Prisoner of War - Kill every one except the female vigins in wartime then make them your wives. Numbers 31: 1-18

4) Slave - Exodus 21: 1-6



Wait, I have no pictures, so I guess this doesn't count. Never mind.#-o

SammyETN wrote:






Maybe all those......but David, Jacob, and Solomon didn't have any husbands!
DrafterX
13 years ago

Which one does he support?

SammyETN wrote:




Interesting stuff... 🤔

but you know what they all have in common..?? 😕
SammyETN
13 years ago

Maybe all those......but David, Jacob, and Solomon didn't have any husbands!

HockeyDad wrote:




Actually David had one. His name was Jonathan.
riverdog
13 years ago
I have never patronized Chick Fil-A as they have consistently discriminated against those with peanut allergies.
DrafterX
13 years ago

Actually David had one. His name was Jonathan.

SammyETN wrote:




there was no marriage there... the supposed gay-homo relationship is specualtion also... 🤐 🤐
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
Damn, I wish I could get worked up about this. Somehow it doesn't seem to break into my Top 1,000 things to worry about though...
I envy you angry young guys!🤬
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Actually David had one. His name was Jonathan.

SammyETN wrote:




Gay-homo militant extremist revisionist history. FAIL. Now eat more chicken.
DrafterX
13 years ago

Damn, I wish I could get worked up about this. Somehow it doesn't seem to break into my Top 1,000 things to worry about though...
I envy you angry young guys!🤬

bloody spaniard wrote:





nobodys worked up here.... do we look like noobs or what..?? 😕
ProbateGeek
13 years ago
The closest Chick-fil-A to me is 344.99 miles away - wonder what shipping might run me, with extra pickles? Or perhaps sue them for discriminating against Oregonians and Washingtonians? Hmmm....
SammyETN
13 years ago

there was no marriage there... the supposed gay-homo relationship is specualtion also... 🤐 🤐

DrafterX wrote:




Sorry, Drafter, was not aware you were a biblical expert, which you must be to be able to state without any doubt , that it never happened. Can't agrue with an expert. I mean all I am is an ordained minister.
SammyETN
13 years ago

Gay-homo militant extremist revisionist history. FAIL. Now eat more chicken.

HockeyDad wrote:




Is everything that is pro-gay gay-homo extremism?
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

Sorry, Drafter, was not aware you were a biblical expert, which you must be to be able to state without any doubt , that it never happened. Can't agrue with an expert. I mean all I am is an ordained minister.

SammyETN wrote:




ME TOO!!!



http://dudeism.com/ordination/ [frypan]
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Sorry, Drafter, was not aware you were a biblical expert, which you must be to be able to state without any doubt , that it never happened. Can't agrue with an expert. I mean all I am is an ordained minister.

SammyETN wrote:




So you're a biblical expert and are saying they were married?

HockeyDad
13 years ago

Is everything that is pro-gay gay-homo extremism?

SammyETN wrote:




No. Some of it is gay-homo militant extremism.
SammyETN
13 years ago
Not saying I am a biblical expert, but am saying that phrases used in the original text discussing the two were only ever used in regards to individuals engaged in a sexual relationship.
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

No. Some of it is gay-homo militant extremism.

HockeyDad wrote:




I will not have my fwends widiculed by the common soldiewy.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Not saying I am a biblical expert, but am saying that phrases used in the original text discussing the two were only ever used in regards to individuals engaged in a sexual relationship.

SammyETN wrote:





So you have modified and interpreted it to meet your agenda. Well played.
SammyETN
13 years ago
No, just saying the usage of certain terms means certain things. Like calling someone a cigar smoker means that person smokes cigars.
Users browsing this topic