Poll Question: Which direction should the GOP go?
Buckwheat
13 years ago
What say you?
victor809
13 years ago
I definitely think they need to go more conservative...

That's definitely working...
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
Conservative? phffft More like Democrat lite. They stand for nothing.
Go back to the ways of Reagan. Discard Romneisms, MacLames, Bushiite, Doleless, and oatmeal Fordism.

Naaaah, too late for that now. Go after the illegal vote and promise soccer moms, urban folk, queers, and unions more than the Democrats offer.
Yeah, THAT's the ticket!!
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago
Other - They should go straight to hell. Take the Dems with them too!
bloody spaniard
13 years ago

Other - They should go straight to hell. Take the Dems with them too!

DrMaddVibe wrote:


:-k

You make a convincing argument...
Yep. I agree with sending them BOTH there too. Democrats first though. They've done more damage.
ZRX1200
13 years ago
Tea Party is a misnomer now as they've been coopted by the likes of ****** Army.

How about a tea party minus the Religious Right and old style party hacks.

Freedom and liberty orientated please.
victor809
13 years ago

Tea Party is a misnomer now as they've been coopted by the likes of ****** Army.

How about a tea party minus the Religious Right and old style party hacks.

Freedom and liberty orientated please.

ZRX1200 wrote:



^ that'd be wise.
But you can't keep those asses out. And they've got the $$

The tea party started with a good idea. Then they got coopted by the religious right.
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
How was the Tea Party co-opted by the so called religious right? Support for Israel? Prayer in school? Christmas displays of the manger (gasp)!
I consider myself part of the "religious right". I haven't co-opted anything.
Please educate me. I'm serioupolous.
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
Reagan LOVED and was practically a part of the "religious right" btw.
victor809
13 years ago

How was the Tea Party co-opted by the so called religious right? Support for Israel? Prayer in school? Christmas displays of the manger (gasp)!
I consider myself part of the "religious right". I haven't co-opted anything.
Please educate me. I'm serioupolous.

bloody spaniard wrote:



If I recall, initial tea party "protests" were centered solely around spending and people's irritation at the bloat in government.

It wasn't until the group started gaining traction that certain groups (including the religious right) started to want to add language to their platforms around "family values" etc.
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

It wasn't until the group started gaining traction that certain groups (including the religious right) started to want to add language to their platforms around "family values" etc.

victor809 wrote:



What a load of crap.

You just making that stuff up or are you going to provide some links to back those stories up?
Homebrew
13 years ago

Tea Party is a misnomer now as they've been coopted by the likes of ****** Army.

How about a tea party minus the Religious Right and old style party hacks.

Freedom and liberty orientated please.

ZRX1200 wrote:


I agree. The Tea Party started out, with a message that I agreed with mainly, but have since, just turned into a Republican lite.

Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
tegulator
13 years ago

I agree. The Tea Party started out, with a message that I agreed with mainly, but have since, just turned into a Republican lite.

Homebrew wrote:



Never mind the astroturfing.
victor809
13 years ago

I agree. The Tea Party started out, with a message that I agreed with mainly, but have since, just turned into a Republican lite.

Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)

Homebrew wrote:



Not even "lite" in some cases...
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
Back in '94, the "Contract with America" showed much promise. Won Republicans a lot of seats. Then it just fizzled out.
ZRX1200
13 years ago
Astroturfing.


More language control by statist phuktards.
victor809
13 years ago

Back in '94, the "Contract with America" showed much promise. Won Republicans a lot of seats. Then it just fizzled out.

bloody spaniard wrote:



Well... which side of the contract reneged?
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
IMHO, I don't thing renege is the correct word, Victor. More like, forgotten or ignored. Parts of it were tossed aside for expediency in getting the milquetoast Boehners of the world re-elected. Others, like Newt & Tom DeLay discredited it with their antics. Then, when dubya entered the scene, the war began & it was tossed for budgetary reasons. That and the first phoney bailout Tarp.
TimFusco
13 years ago

If I recall, initial tea party "protests" were centered solely around spending and people's irritation at the bloat in government.

It wasn't until the group started gaining traction that certain groups (including the religious right) started to want to add language to their platforms around "family values" etc.

victor809 wrote:



Maybe some "family values" is what we need in this country.

Where is the poll option for Reagan Conservatism?
victor809
13 years ago

Maybe some "family values" is what we need in this country.

Where is the poll option for Reagan Conservatism?

TimFusco wrote:



.... and who's "family values" would you suggest we use?

I'll tell you right now, that I'll only agree to this if we all use MY family values. You all have to do what I say is right or wrong....

Users browsing this topic