so because they can't find it on a map, means that those lives mean nothing?

Mrs.Tank wrote:

so because they can't find it on a map, means that those lives mean nothing?

Mrs.Tank wrote:

I find it difficult to take anyone seriously that suggests anyone beleives the loss of life means nothing. It is nothing but rhetoric to me. There is an irony that would be amusing if not so sad when folks use that BS.

teedubbya wrote:

Deb, you have to keep in mind this IS how Victor amuses himself. I pass gas instead it's funner 🌫

TMCTLT wrote:

don't argue with a tank....[-x

DrafterX wrote:

Deb, you have to keep in mind this IS how Victor amuses himself. I pass gas instead it's funner 🌫

TMCTLT wrote:

lmao...

I think my dog thinks his are funny too. He toots, and then runs around the room to share.

Mrs.Tank wrote:

tank is sleeping on the couch. If he's not there, he's on the deck, or at work.

Mrs.Tank wrote:

One might argue that if a person can't find it on a map, there could be lots of other information gaps which would otherwise affect their opinion. It would certainly suggest that their OUTRAGE! (TM Hockeydad) is somewhat manufactured. :)

victor809 wrote:

Most Americans don't understand how the earths atmosphere functions, yet they believe in global warming.

It could be argued that humans don't truly understand where life came from, why the soul of a person is more valuable than the life of a lesser being. Yet we routinely destroy the fetus in the womb and call it a choice.

Most couldn't point out Sri Lanka on the map, but they prayed and donated to the tsunami relief in 2004.

Are these facts as amusing as the outrage at a cover up by the President and his people in relation to the errors that led to the loss of American lives in Benghazi?

tailgater wrote: