Brewha
12 years ago

Forget it Sean. No matter what you say to him, he'll only offer drivel in return. No facts, just drivel and sarcasm. Why feel the troll?

Abrignac wrote:


Your just trying to hurt my feelings, aren't you?

Btw, what exactly does "feel the troll" mean?
fishinguitarman
12 years ago
Fuzz's evil twin 🤦
ZRX1200
12 years ago
No......Fuzzy is a jerk.

Brewha is a good dude.
kombat96
12 years ago
Has All Gore commented on this yet?
DadZilla3
12 years ago

DZ, remember when we had to get rid of Florocarbons because they were destroying the Ozone? You figure that was fake too?
Do you not understand the effect of greenhouse gasses? Or is it that you just don't care?

Brewha wrote:


Yes.
Yes.
No.
No.
DadZilla3
12 years ago

Brewha is a good dude.

ZRX1200 wrote:


Yes.
Brewha
12 years ago

Fuzz's evil twin 🤦

fishinguitarman wrote:


And where would Cbid be without it's small contingent of liberals?
Face it FGM, without us pablum puking libtards the political forum would be nothing more than old conservative curmudgeons cut and pasting Fox News articles, carping about Obama, reminiscing about the Reagan years.
It's the disagreement and discourse that makes this country great!
Excuse me while I go down to the post office to salute a flag . . . .





And thx Z and DZ, nice of you to say.
MACS
12 years ago

I can repect your conviction and even your conclusion. But if I read you correctly you believe that there in not a concensus among scientists, there fore pollution is not effecting the climate. Oil company funded propaganda aside, this is not a tenable - or responsible - position. Given what is at stake for our children, not a responsible position at all.

And since you neither agree with the overwelming majority of scientists, or the United States Governent I guess I can't muster that giant fact book for you either.

So I guess we will agree to disagree - one bit bull to another.

Brewha wrote:



Scientists come up with data to support the people feeding their research. And Hell NO I do not trust our government. They're a bunch of phuktards.

Never said it is not affecting the climate, just don't believe it is as bad as they make it out to be... given our data is over the last, what? 100 years? And the planet is billions of years old?

Anyway, agreed... we disagree.
DrafterX
12 years ago
still think all they need is some dynamite.... 😟




and didn't Drew Barrymore and the eskimos dig a 100 mile trench thru the ice to free Willy or somethin..?? 😕
Brewha
12 years ago

still think all they need is some dynamite.... 😟




and didn't Drew Barrymore and the eskimos dig a 100 mile trench thru the ice to free Willy or somethin..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:


Thermite, I think you meant thermite.

For the ice, not Drew . . .
DadZilla3
12 years ago
We could just send Barney Frank up there. That guy is flaming enough to melt the entire polar ice cap.
tailgater
12 years ago

I can repect your conviction and even your conclusion. But if I read you correctly you believe that there in not a concensus among scientists, there fore pollution is not effecting the climate. Oil company funded propaganda aside, this is not a tenable - or responsible - position. Given what is at stake for our children, not a responsible position at all.

.

Brewha wrote:



If anti-global warming is oil company funded propaganda, wouldn't that make pro-global warming government funded propaganda?

And oh yeah:
It's for the children.




Brewha
12 years ago

If anti-global warming is oil company funded propaganda, wouldn't that make pro-global warming government funded propaganda?

And oh yeah:
It's for the children.




tailgater wrote:


No.

But thanks for playing!
DrafterX
12 years ago
who's paying for the pro-global warming studies then..?? 😕
Brewha
12 years ago

who's paying for the pro-global warming studies then..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:


A host of nations. Ever looked into the Kyoto Accords? 140 nations sighted on to embrace regulations to fight climate change caused by industrial pollution. You should check it on Snopes, because Fox won't tell you bat guano about it.

But if this rates as propaganda, than is suppose the Geneva Convention was propaganda too.
DrafterX
12 years ago
I'm pretty sure we are still funding the studies... we give Billions to the UN so they can spread the study wealth.... 😟
Brewha
12 years ago

I'm pretty sure we are still funding the studies... we give Billions to the UN so they can spread the study wealth.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:


Right. We also fund studying food poisoning causes. And we regulate accordingly.

Maybe I'm missing your point. Do you feel there is a conspiracy in the US to needlessly regulate pollution? Who would gain from this?
DrafterX
12 years ago
just doubting oil companies are responsible for all the negative reports.... 😟
Brewha
12 years ago

just doubting oil companies are responsible for all the negative reports.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:


Maybe I should not be pointing fingers. However, there are a great many industries that lobbie against pollution regulations because it cuts into profits, or would lower their gross volume of sales. There is a lot of money in these industries and we should expect them to spend inorder to influence opinion in their favor. I mean their business people, what is more important then growth and the bottom line. It's not clean air, I can tell you that . . .
DrafterX
12 years ago
nothing against some pollution control but why tax and set impossible regulations that will force industries out of business..?? meanwhile Obama's green cronies are getting funding for their green projects just to go bankrupt... not mention what wind farms are doing to the bald eagles..... no body ever thinks about the bald eagles... 😞
Users browsing this topic