DrafterX
12 years ago
ya... they ought to just water-board Hillary and get it all out there once and for all... 😟
Gene363
12 years ago

ya... they ought to just water-board Hillary and get it all out there once and for all... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



Yes, "once" for about 10 minutes. =d> =d> =d>
victor809
12 years ago
Wow... Did Hockey "I drive Globalism" Dad just get called a "libbie"? Amelia's just swinging at anything now isn't she.
HockeyDad
12 years ago

Wow... Did Hockey "I drive Globalism" Dad just get called a "libbie"? Amelia's just swinging at anything now isn't she.

victor809 wrote:




Amelia did not take my rejection well. I wish it had not played out in public.
gryphonms
12 years ago
All true, but the kinder gentler Cbid was not going to last and we all knew that. While you cannot replace bloody and scompay this helps in a limited way.
victor809
12 years ago

Amelia did not take my rejection well. I wish it had not played out in public.

HockeyDad wrote:



Amelia's a bitter little tart, isn't she.
Bitter Klinger
12 years ago
All fun aside, does anyone here truly believe the people at the helm were paying any attention to what was going on? And once the attack happened, does anyone on here honestly believe one word of a video causing a protest? Can you not call a spade a spade without a COA? Who's the "tool" if you refuse to accept the truth because the players won't fall on their own swords? Thats why we have courts. The guilty rarely fess up until forced, and sometimes they never do.

2 days prior to the attack, Obama proclaimed "Al Queda is dead and GM is alive". What a crock.

http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/benghazi-the-biggest-cover-up-scandal-in-u-s-history-was-benghazi-a-cia-gun-running-operation-for-muslim-brotherhood-other-insurgents-fighting-in-syria/ 

We're all being lied to, and because the liars won't admit it, it doesn't put them in the clear, nor must we accept their lies as the truth as some here insist upon. It puts them squarely and rightfully in the crosshairs of an upcoming and long overdue congressional hearing. Not to be confused with an internal investigation of themselves, as they did. They have sanitized "talking points" that were passed around immediately following the attack. They redacted so much of the reports and emails that much is illegible - but not all. Thats not national security, its a cover-up. It takes time to sift through what's left, but they're doing it. And like it or don't they have found more evidence.

We're being lied to about who knew what and when partly because of the gun running, but mostly because it was politically damning to tell the truth - because BO stood to lose an election. And thats treason. And if you pretend this is unimportant or unworthy of investigation because your chosen political candidate would be harmed, you're far worse than a tool.




victor809
12 years ago


We're all being lied to, and because the liars won't admit it, it doesn't put them in the clear, nor must we accept their lies as the truth as some here insist upon. It puts them squarely and rightfully in the crosshairs of an upcoming and long overdue congressional hearing.


Bitter Klinger wrote:



I'm sure once they're in a congressional hearing they'll definitely tell you exactly what you want to hear.

🙄

You don't have any information. You're a poor schlub on a discount cigar forum. You're being told by one set of politicians that another set of politicians is lying to you. And you're believing them without any evidence supporting either sides claims. You're just believing the side you want to believe because it coincides with how you want to see the world. The politicians know nothing is going to come of any of this, they probably joke about it when the cameras are off.
gryphonms
12 years ago
Actually I think they trot Benghazi out anytime there is another issue they want to under publicize. In this case my guess is the VA scandal. Even though it is happening on a Democratic watch, both parties are culpable in my opinion.
Buckwheat
12 years ago

... they probably joke about it when the cameras are off.

victor809 wrote:



They'll be joking about it every time they cash their Government paychecks FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES!!!

[ram27bat]
Bitter Klinger
12 years ago
I hope they don't find the most damning evidence until oh, say around Oct. 2016. Of course I'm sure now that the demmies have decided to play ball, they'll be trying to declare it dead on arrival and want to sweep it under the rug as fast as possible.

It'll be fun to watch the media continue to ignore it, too. Imagine the storied they'll invent to report instead...
Bitter Klinger
12 years ago

Actually I think they trot Benghazi out anytime there is another issue they want to under publicize. In this case my guess is the VA scandal. Even though it is happening on a Democratic watch, both parties are culpable in my opinion.

gryphonms wrote:



I dunno, I heard a clip of Obama feigning anger over the VA situation from 2008. Just like he did again the other day, as if he'd never heard of the problem before...This is a good topic for a new thread!
tailgater
12 years ago
Victor,
the original article explains how the GOP are wallowed in a conundrum of sorts.
It does not explain how the American People should act.

If the administration was forthcoming from the beginning, we're not wallowed down in this discussion.
to blame those who have to PUSH for every morsel is counter production and short sighted.

victor809
12 years ago

Victor,
the original article explains how the GOP are wallowed in a conundrum of sorts.
It does not explain how the American People should act.

If the administration was forthcoming from the beginning, we're not wallowed down in this discussion.
to blame those who have to PUSH for every morsel is counter production and short sighted.

tailgater wrote:



You're not wrong Tail... but you're not necessarily right either. The people can act however they want, it's still a free country (For the next week or two at least). And yes, the administration was not transparent at the beginning (whether this was because they were trying to spin it, or because they didn't have all the info either isn't really relevant). However, Benghazi has turned into the same tiresome exercise as the birthers. The people "demanding answers" have very specific answers they want. They don't know that these are the correct answers, they just think they are the correct answers (because it's politically expedient that they be the correct answers). And these people are going to continue "demanding answers" until the answer is exactly what they want it to be. That's not trying to determine the truth... that's just trying to get a lie which coincides with your reality.
teedubbya
12 years ago
If lovin Vic is wrong Tail doesn't want to be right

And I'm pretty sure Klinger owned Vic I just haven't read that part yet.
Abrignac
12 years ago
This nothing but a huge smoke screen to derail a Hilliary run for the White House which is fine by me.

But, if one wants to impeach, there is a long list of Presidents who were in office when impeachable offenses occurred.
DrafterX
12 years ago
I wonder what would happen if someone hit a Russian embassy this way.... 🤔 🤔
Abrignac
12 years ago

I wonder what would happen if someone hit a Russian embassy this way.... 🤔 🤔

DrafterX wrote:



Not gonna happen anytime soon. For the most part it seems, their politicians have a sense of national pride and can keep their mouths shut.

If that happened to a Russian embassy Putin would QUIETLY make sure those who did it along with their entire genetic down line was never heard from again.
teedubbya
12 years ago

I wonder what would happen if someone hit a Russian embassy this way.... 🤔 🤔

DrafterX wrote:




[email protected]
DrafterX
12 years ago


If that happened to a Russian embassy Putin would QUIETLY make sure those who did it along with their entire genetic down line was never heard from again.

Abrignac wrote:





Kind of like the Clintons.... 🤔
Users browsing this topic