Would love to see the transcripts on donations for the last two National elections and before for that matter.

TMCTLT wrote:

Sure why not, he seems to be the ONLY rational voice for the most part in the Middle East, I cannot fathom why the POTUS would want to allow Iran to obtain nucular ( GW reference....couldn't help myself ) capabilities, With that being said.....this is not that by any stretch.

TMCTLT wrote:

Sure why not, he seems to be the ONLY rational voice for the most part in the Middle East, I cannot fathom why the POTUS would want to allow Iran to obtain nucular ( GW reference....couldn't help myself ) capabilities, With that being said.....this is not that by any stretch.

TMCTLT wrote:

I appreciate the fact he answered honestly, though.

SmokeMonkey wrote:

I guess the "why not" part is because one can only be for or against allowing outsiders affecting elections. I asked, not because I am anti Netanyahu necessarily, but to find out if you hold those with whom you agree to the same rules.

You don't.

frankj1 wrote:

Frank, you'll have to excuse my ignorant self....but what does allowing a man who represents one of if not THE strongest ally we have in the M E. to speak in front of our House leaders have to do with allowing Millions of Illegals to directly participate in our elections?

TMCTLT wrote:

We all know for a fact that our elections are being corrupted by outsiders who are allowed to donate to the candidate that they believe will benefit them

I understood the above line (from your post) to actually mean outsiders. I am not questioning being a supporter of Israel or their leader at all, in fact we agree there. Just asking if you apply the same rules and regulations to a friend as you would to a perceived enemy of your cause. You do not, that means special classes live above the law in your Utopia.

Where I see us differing is I would apply rules/laws etc equally, or risk being just another dictator type, no matter how friendly.

Paul, a benevolent dictator is front and foremost a dictator! And I am staunchly against even one that does all of my bidding.

AND...I did not call you ignorant. I was discussing a point.

frankj1 wrote:

Utopia - isn't that the two story outhouse remodeling job TCBY was working on, until he used the lower floor and found the flaw in trickle down theory ?

tonygraz wrote:

Such anger......

Abrignac wrote:

Anthony, you have this troll follow you around with nothing to offer to the conversation but personal attacks and see how you deal with it!! Like I said F*ck the A hole, I have nothing "nicer " to say to him sorry.

TMCTLT wrote: