gummy jones
11 years ago
Prager redskins
banderl
11 years ago

Prager redskins

gummy jones wrote:




No you didn't!
banderl
11 years ago
Prager Daigres?
banderl
11 years ago
Prager Meighers?
victor809
11 years ago
Guess Burner is still trying to find any scrap of useful data in that video.
banderl
11 years ago
I wonder what kind of offense their team runs?
gummy jones
11 years ago

I wonder what kind of offense their team runs?

banderl wrote:



Mostly long bombs
banderl
11 years ago
Is Roman Gabriel Jr. their QB?
gummy jones
11 years ago

Is Roman Gabriel Jr. their QB?

banderl wrote:



No I think it's kordel stewart
tonygraz
11 years ago
De Pew stinks.
tonygraz
11 years ago
Trust --- do you trust Iran - do you trust Israel ? If you think we can trust Israel, do a search for USS Liberty.
DrafterX
11 years ago
turn them into glass I say... 😠
gummy jones
11 years ago

Trust --- do you trust Iran - do you trust Israel ? If you think we can trust Israel, do a search for USS Liberty.

tonygraz wrote:



let me give it a shot

1) no you cant trust iran (that cant be a serious question)

2) in the region, israel is the only one we can trust (yes even despite something that happened 50 years ago - wink) but it is tricky because with obama they are well aware that they can no longer trust us
tonygraz
11 years ago
Are you saying they don't trust blacks or just inferring it ?
QMPASH
11 years ago

Seriously? You don't think the application of knowledge is important? This explains your arguments.

Fine. Lets get down to "common sense" as you so clearly want. You posted the video, you stand by it.

Using only facts stated in the video, state what we are giving up, and what we are gaining from the Iran deal. Explain how we are giving up more than we are gaining (ie, a bad deal).

My opinion is irrelevant in this discussion. I haven't given it and I don't need to give it for the video to be wrong.

victor809 wrote:



Since you like to argue about "logic," try this one for size. Iran has called for "the destruction of Israel," not once, but on many occasions. What do you think the first thing would be that Iran would do with a nuclear bomb, if they had one? The day after the nuclear agreement was announced to the world, people in Iran (egged on by their infallible mullahs) shouted, "Death to America." What do you think the deep, inner meaning of this was? Even before he became Germany's Chancellor and then its dictator; Hitler was calling the Jews the enemies of humanity and calling for their destruction. Do you think he was merely speaking metaphorically? Do you see any parallel between Hitler's statements (in public and in "Mein Kampf") with similar statements from Iran? Asking Iran to monitor its own nuclear facilities is similar to asking a fox to guard the henhouse. Now you can go back to argue about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. 👻
Burner02
11 years ago

Since you like to argue about "logic," try this one for size. Iran has called for "the destruction of Israel," not once, but on many occasions. What do you think the first thing would be that Iran would do with a nuclear bomb, if they had one? The day after the nuclear agreement was announced to the world, people in Iran (egged on by their infallible mullahs) shouted, "Death to America." What do you think the deep, inner meaning of this was? Even before he became Germany's Chancellor and then its dictator; Hitler was calling the Jews the enemies of humanity and calling for their destruction. Do you think he was merely speaking metaphorically? Do you see any parallel between Hitler's statements (in public and in "Mein Kampf") with similar statements from Iran? Asking Iran to monitor its own nuclear facilities is similar to asking a fox to guard the henhouse. Now you can go back to argue about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. :-({|=

QMPASH wrote:




Be very careful, you are drawing a parallel to the OP.

Would not want you to confuse anyone.
tonygraz
11 years ago
Q - so why didn't Bush invade Iran ? They were one of the three in the axis of evil. Instead he destroyed their strongest neighbor and made room for Isis.
Burner02
11 years ago

Q - so why didn't Bush invade Iran ? They were one of the three in the axis of evil. Instead he destroyed their strongest neighbor and made room for Isis.

tonygraz wrote:





Really?
victor809
11 years ago

Since you like to argue about "logic," try this one for size. Iran has called for "the destruction of Israel," not once, but on many occasions. What do you think the first thing would be that Iran would do with a nuclear bomb, if they had one? The day after the nuclear agreement was announced to the world, people in Iran (egged on by their infallible mullahs) shouted, "Death to America." What do you think the deep, inner meaning of this was? Even before he became Germany's Chancellor and then its dictator; Hitler was calling the Jews the enemies of humanity and calling for their destruction. Do you think he was merely speaking metaphorically? Do you see any parallel between Hitler's statements (in public and in "Mein Kampf") with similar statements from Iran? Asking Iran to monitor its own nuclear facilities is similar to asking a fox to guard the henhouse. Now you can go back to argue about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. :-({|=

QMPASH wrote:



I asked burner to argue the deal is bad based on facts in the video. And you think a response to that is to say: "Iran hates america and hitler hated the Jews". Really?

As for your argument that we're allowing iran to monitor it's own facilities... first, that's not true, second, it isn't in the video so it's not an argument in the video showing the strength or weakness of the deal.

victor809
11 years ago

Be very careful, you are drawing a parallel to the OP.

Would not want you to confuse anyone.

Burner02 wrote:



You still looking for any facts in that video to support your argument, or did you give up and admit that the video is a steaming pile of bullsh%t.
Users browsing this topic