Brewha, so your good with lying, scumbag, elitist?

Speyside wrote:

You're just trying to hurt my feeling, arn't you Mikey....

Brewha wrote:

nope, my opinion

mikey1597 wrote:

It was not eloquence alone. Some us us also understood both the words and the ideas.

But, any practical measure - he ase been the best president in our time.
Don't you think?

Brewha wrote:

But I remember when we had beers in Dallas, and you told me of you respect for him - not just as a president or a Democrate, but as a man.
A strong, tall, muscular black man......



... Or maybe Drafter said that ....

Brewha wrote:

Ha Ha Ha, what kind of drugs were you on that night?

Next herf I'll remind you what I said, they wont let me post it here on the boards.

mikey1597 wrote:

[/color]



It'a a shame you have to consistently insult others intelligence in order to defend your own biases...

Again....you couldn't have possibly said that with a straight face....

TMCTLT wrote:

To be honest Dr. M. The only thing I actually agree with in your post is that you will seriously miss Obama.

The rest of it - no so much.....

But I will call you out on one thing:
"Carpetbagger"?

Wow. - you can really cross the line.....

Brewha wrote:

The important part of the story is NOT "american dead". It's that the CIA were selling guns and holding hostages at an annex building. They attacked the place for over 8 hours. They smoked out a US ambassador of his safe room and killed him.

Then again, you tend to believe her lies.

I really thought you were smarter than that. Thanks for clearing that up. Your priorities are wrapped up in defending lies. Good luck with that, but then again...you're used to it. You're a useful idiot to a power elite that wipe their feet on your back.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/08/why-hillary-clinton-keeps-lying/493841/ 

DrMaddVibe wrote:

You conflate "believing" or "defending" lies with being interested in evidence over predisposed dislike for her.

If your biggest concern is whether a dead american's family was told they were killed by a riot or a premeditated attack within the first 72 hours (when we know they were eventually given the accurate information), then perhaps she's done a great job.

I mean seriously... the way the republicans talk she's the devil incarnate. And the best she's managed to do is that? I think you should expect a bit more in your evil incarnate.

I didn't even want the dems to nominate her... but I'm pretty unimpressed with the scandal everyone wants to try to bring her down on.

victor809 wrote:

I tend to agree with her here.

The important part of the story is "american dead". the important part isn't "because of riot due to video" or "because of planned attack". Either way americans are dead. If you think the important part is trying to parse whether a politician correctly identified the cause within the first 72 hours (there is plenty of time for analysis later)... then I'd say you've got your priorities wrong. But that's just me.

victor809 wrote:

Again. You are presupposing that she lied, without any clear information. While I understand you don't like her, you can't possibly think that you are looking at this in an unbiased manner when the words you use are assuming she was wrong before you even think about the problem.

victor809 wrote:

I think the perceive bias in the media is largely owing to Trump being an embarrassment to his party. Add to this our on going embarrassment in front of other countries because of his grade school remarks and it seems clear why news would focus on his foibles.

Brewha wrote:

You may be correct.
But that would be admitting that the media is indeed biased. Something you've been unwilling to admit previously.

tailgater wrote:

It is odd how reporting actual quotes can being taken as bias tho... 🤔

and then be argued by the other side with 'She didn't mean that'....

DrafterX wrote:

I think the perceive bias in the media is largely owing to Trump being an embarrassment to his party. Add to this our on going embarrassment in front of other countries because of his grade school remarks and it seems clear why news would focus on his foibles.

Brewha wrote: