frankj1
9 years ago

TMCTLT, Obama had Homeland Security bust up almost every known white supremacy group during his administration. That was probably a good thing too it needed to happen and I'm pretty sure other domestic terror groups went down in the process since most of those organizations make deals with other organizations that aren't white.

jjanecka wrote:


not to mention the FBI warnings under president Cheney...conspiracies to get into the military and police forces!

this can't really have been unknown here?
delta1
9 years ago

Really Frank?????? I'd say in a reality based World we have Much More to fear from any one of the violent BLM groups than ANY supposed White Supremacy group. They seem to be pretty quiet ( even under eight years of a Black race baiting POTUS
But then what do I know, ( may I see the documentation? )


TMCTLT wrote:



Here's a list of about 40 incidents since 1995 in the US involving homicides committed by suspects aligned with white supremacist groups. The list does not include the Oklahoma City bombing by McVeigh, also a white supremacist. Many of those killed were law enforcement officers.


http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/06/18/white_extremist_murders_killed_at_least_60_in_u_s_since_1995.html?cq_ck=1486485587473 
tailgater
9 years ago
Trump got elected on a platform that puts America first.
Some of his goals are aimed towards the manufacturing unbalance. this was the main reason I supported him.
Some of his other goals were in regards to National Security.
Build a wall. Screen immigrants. etc.

We need to accept the fact that tomorrow's terror plot may not be as simple as gun fight. Or a plane crash.
Dirty bombs are a low probability, but with devastating effects beyond what any of us can imagine.

So do we do something or do we ignore it because it's easier and makes us appear to have empathy?


I was traveling this past week.
I saw how my airplane had life vests under my seat. And the seat cushion could be used as a flotation device.

What is the probability that I'd be able to successfully utilize such a device if needed?
This is a rhetorical question. Because they have NEVER been needed in modern airline travel.
Ever.
Yet, EVERY plane must have them.

As American's we accept the insane costs associated with safety.
yet we balk when people are inconvenienced.


Is this religious? Sure. we all know that the Muslim religion is associated with worldwide terror.
But it wasn't Trump who made the list of 7 countries. And if it doesn't include all the Muslim countries then we can't really call it an attack on a religion.

Stop the rhetoric.
Tell me you don't want America to have secure borders. We can then debate this honestly.
Until then, you're just perpetuating the anti-Trump scare tactics. And quite honestly, it's tiresome.



DrafterX
9 years ago
Didn't they use them when Capt. Schlumberger crashed in da river..?? 😕
SteveS
9 years ago
"gater has spoken my thoughts better than I probably could have done ... it has, in fact, become tiresome in the extreme ... not to mention the politically correct bullsh*tness of the whole thing.
tailgater
9 years ago

Didn't they use them when Capt. Schlumberger crashed in da river..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:



Wearing a life vest and using one to save your life is quite different.
Or so I am told.

DrMaddVibe
9 years ago

Stop the rhetoric.
Tell me you don't want America to have secure borders. We can then debate this honestly.
Until then, you're just perpetuating the anti-Trump scare tactics. And quite honestly, it's tiresome.

tailgater wrote:




Awesome post...the last paragraph is the one that got me.

To the point...sincere and quite honest.

Point is they won't debate...honestly either. They would rather perpetuate the lies. Trump is homophobic, racist, misogynist and whatever they want to paint him with. That's the game they want to play.

Can you imagine for a second if...just if...one of the illegal immigrants that got in this past week while the 9th Circuit tied this up in knots and bastardized the ruling were to shoot up a mall, set off a bomb in Times Square or hold hostages in a school? That blood is on those judges...AND the morons supporting it. I really hope we can fix the immigration issue...can't or won't build a wall? Lay out a minefield, start using Predator drones and build gun turrets. Pass legislation ending the "anchor baby" too. Enough is enough.
victor809
9 years ago
I'll say it tail. I don't want our country to have secure borders.

Why bother?

Let our populace be armed and deal with the issue here. If someone doesn't want to be armed that's their right and they're willing to accept the risk of not being armed (as I do).

Your personal fear that you or someone you love may hit that one in a million chance of being in the wrong place at the wrong time when something bad happens is more your problem than mine or anyone elses. Seems silly to waste so much money because you're scared. But... you believe in big government and tax and waste and all that... like a socialist. So I guess that's to be expected.
DrMaddVibe
9 years ago
A worker program that could pay massive dividends!!!

Use prison workers...not super max ones...but inmates with 3-5 years left on a sentence...run the open air prison and let Sherrif Joe be the warden...build parts of the wall with them! win-win for the taxpayer. Don't work...don't eat. Work hard...get a hot shower. Show aptitude and willingness...watch some tv. All of the ICE throwbacks? They just earned 5 years for illegally entering our nation. Tough titty said the kitty...ándele...muy bueno! Institute shoot to kill orders and randomly keep inmates on their toes by shooting...LOL!!!

What a boon...let them drag legislation into that one and Trump can employ the National Guard tomorrow.

The Art of the Deal is in da house!
DrMaddVibe
9 years ago

Let our populace be armed and deal with the issue here. If someone doesn't want to be armed that's their right and they're willing to accept the risk of not being armed (as I do).

victor809 wrote:




Yeah...any idea how the DNC wants to take guns away?

That's just not a workable solution...ever with the rank and file in DC or the Beltway...or on the Coasts...flyover states live that way now...maybe if we had National repricitory...maybe. We don't though. Guess who is holding that up?
frankj1
9 years ago

Here's a list of about 40 incidents since 1995 in the US involving homicides committed by suspects aligned with white supremacist groups. The list does not include the Oklahoma City bombing by McVeigh, also a white supremacist. Many of those killed were law enforcement officers.


http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/06/18/white_extremist_murders_killed_at_least_60_in_u_s_since_1995.html?cq_ck=1486485587473 

delta1 wrote:


Geez Al, I only meant since 9/11.

anyone have the body count of Americans killed here by extremists born in the seven banned countries since 9/11/birth of Homeland? Or all Muslim countries?

I am and was obviously being intentionally provocative.

It would be easy to assume I am saying ban the entire world, or even ban no one at all, but both would be incorrect.
I'm saying this specific Trump move is a test of our tolerance, and it certainly does not promote safety...as Al has helped to illustrate.

The term "White Supremacists"conjures up gut reactions, much like the term "Muslim Terrorists", but despite the sheer facts of which group has murdered many times more of us, it's the latter that is really scary to us when uttered on the news...myself included as I am just as susceptible to language controlling reality as anyone, especially since Terrorists are attached to bigger splashier news than Supremacists. Media consider Terror sexier I guess, despite the facts.

And kids going off randomly on campus are even less of a worry than Terrorists, despite their success in carnage.

MACS can attest to the fact that my wife and I were truly astonished to learn what goes into our freedom when he so generously gave us a tour of San Diego Bay and pointed out so much about our proud Navy. Even one who never gave it a thought like The Lovely Caren could not and has not stopped talking about how important supporting our military branches is to our way of life. I am not shrugging my shoulders in a lib-dream that many here imagine me to be doing.
I love my freedom, our way of life, and I do know there are groups dedicated to ending it...both here and abroad.

But this little piece of Trumpism relates more to my paragraph about language and emotion vs reality. We need real safety plans, not slogans, not cherry picking to curry gut reaction. Not tests to see how much we will cower and how much power we will allow. Vigilance, clear headed decisions, not tweets.

elRopo
9 years ago
I say to hell with the wall, build a moat instead. Fill it with mines and crocodiles, cheaper and more effective. Beautify it with trees and grassy park lands to satisfy the eco-nazis.
frankj1
9 years ago
don't most southern illegals simply fly here and never leave?

They aren't even terrorists!
DrMaddVibe
9 years ago

Geez Al, I only meant since 9/11.

anyone have the body count of Americans killed here by extremists born in the seven banned countries since 9/11/birth of Homeland? Or all Muslim countries?

I am and was obviously being intentionally provocative.

It would be easy to assume I am saying ban the entire world, or even ban no one at all, but both would be incorrect.
I'm saying this specific Trump move is a test of our tolerance, and it certainly does not promote safety...as Al has helped to illustrate.

The term "White Supremacists"conjures up gut reactions, much like the term "Muslim Terrorists", but despite the sheer facts of which group has murdered many times more of us, it's the latter that is really scary to us when uttered on the news...myself included as I am just as susceptible to language controlling reality as anyone, especially since Terrorists are attached to bigger splashier news than Supremacists. Media consider Terror sexier I guess, despite the facts.

And kids going off randomly on campus are even less of a worry than Terrorists, despite their success in carnage.

MACS can attest to the fact that my wife and I were truly astonished to learn what goes into our freedom when he so generously gave us a tour of San Diego Bay and pointed out so much about our proud Navy. Even one who never gave it a thought like The Lovely Caren could not and has not stopped talking about how important supporting our military branches is to our way of life. I am not shrugging my shoulders in a lib-dream that many here imagine me to be doing.
I love my freedom, our way of life, and I do know there are groups dedicated to ending it...both here and abroad.

But this little piece of Trumpism relates more to my paragraph about language and emotion vs reality. We need real safety plans, not slogans, not cherry picking to curry gut reaction. Not tests to see how much we will cower and how much power we will allow. Vigilance, clear headed decisions, not tweets.

frankj1 wrote:




Frank...you're just not right. No, really you're not Right. Left leaning centrist...maybe.

Hear ya loud and clear.
DrMaddVibe
9 years ago

don't most southern illegals simply fly here and never leave?

They aren't even terrorists!

frankj1 wrote:




Actually the move with the crops. Florida, Michigan, Texas, California...all over. Send the money back home and live in abject poverty here with multiple families living in one home...spend 5-6 years and go home. Met and talke with many of them...Strawberries are huge where I live...oranges too.
elRopo
9 years ago

don't most southern illegals simply fly here and never leave?

They aren't even terrorists!

frankj1 wrote:


A good many still come across the old fashioned way, drug smugglers too. Think of the entertainment value.
elRopo
9 years ago
All kidding aside Frank, migrant farm workers aren't necessarily illegal. They can get a green card and come in legally and stay for a set amount of time. Illegals are a problem and there are a LOT of them coming across the river here. We only know about the ones we catch and truthfully don't really know how many make it undetected. We need to know WHO these people are and what business they have here. Same as if WE travel to their country.
frankj1
9 years ago

All kidding aside Frank, migrant farm workers aren't necessarily illegal. They can get a green card and come in legally and stay for a set amount of time. Illegals are a problem and there are a LOT of them coming across the river here. We only know about the ones we catch and truthfully don't really know how many make it undetected. We need to know WHO these people are and what business they have here. Same as if WE travel to their country.

elRopo wrote:


I am sure you know much more than I do about our southern border, and I'm not being a wise azz.
Thanks.
frankj1
9 years ago

Frank...you're just not right. No, really you're not Right. Left leaning centrist...maybe.

Hear ya loud and clear.

DrMaddVibe wrote:


I suppose I could have chosen a less inflammatory parallel.
But as you know, the show must go on! These people have paid good money to read this stuff here, I can't always be using my safe shtick.

No I ain't right, I'm tetched in da head...prolly left hemisphere
DrafterX
9 years ago
TW does salt water enemas... 😟
Users browsing this topic