This was mentioned briefly in another thread. I thought it deserved its own thread.
First, the CDC/HHS are calling this ban a "mischaracterization of discussions regarding the budget formulation process". So, I'll buy that it isn't a ban... more a "suggestion". It is important to note that by calling it a mischaracterization they are implicitly admitting that there was a discussion of word choice.
Most of the words... who cares. Yeah, "banning" transgender from CDC public documents is a d1ck move, but fine...
But "science-based" and "evidence-based"??? seriously? and to replace these with: "CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes.” You've got to be kidding me. Since when do "community standards" merit the same weight as science and evidence?
The CDC has all but admitted to it
https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/12/after-firestorm-cdc-director-says-terms-like-science-based-are-not-banned/ "Instead, several sources have tried to clarify that the language changes were merely suggestions to help make the agency’s budget more palatable to some Republicans and ease its passage"
So... they suggest not using words like science based or evidence based because they are afraid it will trigger republicans.
If you every voted for a candidate who won't pass a budget because it uses words like "science based" or "evidence based" you need to stop breeding immediately. There is something deeply wrong with your gene pool