Here's how I see it. Yeah, Trump did the Balls a giant favor.
You're right,any family would be grateful and say thanks. Or should anyway.
Still, I can't really defend or criticize their retraction. Doesn't impact me as a citizen. They hate Trump. Their business. They're sorry they were publicly grateful. Who cares.
What I can't defend is Donald's need to make a big deal out of it.
Not only does that lack class IMO, but it's flat out petty.
Both sides are grandstanders.
But he's the president!

HuckFinn wrote:

If the Ball clan were staunch conservatives, would they blast Trump after he saved their son?


It takes a special kind of bias to do that.

And I marvel at all those who sympathize* with them...








*trademark by TW who uses words he doesn't understand.

tailgater wrote:

LiAngelo Ball, brother of Lonzo Ball and son of Lavar Ball, Plays ball for UCLA.

On a trip to China he got arrested for shoplifting.
The Donald used his clout to help spring him free.

You'd think a person would be thankful.
But, TRUMP!

These pieces of sh1t hate Trump so much that the kid is now saying UCLA forced him to publicly thank the President.

I've said it before: Trump could cure cancer tomorrow, and liberals would complain he didn't do it yesterday.
Now we've got proof.

Cause I don't care if it was a pedo senator from Alabama, if he used political clout to help get my son out of prison in a foreign nation, I'd thank him twice.

I just can't imagine being so butt-hurt about an election result.
Holy crap, you liberals really DO need a serenity room, don't you?

tailgater wrote:

You may be right.
But even comrade brewha would be thankful to the POS in that scenario.

tailgater wrote: