victor809
8 years ago

Hahahahaha! I'm melting, I'm melting!



https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/tax-reform-going/ 

Kawaksback wrote:




pure tripe.
If Obama had claimed those same "historic accomplishments" you would have been calling for a revolution.
"most legislation passed"? If the bills are bad, is it really better that you pass more of them? If they're completely irrelevant, does it matter you've done a whole lot?

"most regulations nullified".... the same... it's a dumb measure because it assumes, with no proof, that removing the regulation is a good thing.

"most executive orders"? You f%%king moron. You were probably one of the people screaming bloody murder about how many executive orders obama signed. Now you're happy trump has signed more?

The tax law is a brilliant way to F%ck the Californians and new yorkers now, while waiting 8 years for an administration change to f%ck the rest of the middle class. To brag about it is idiotic. More importantly... do you really think now is the time for anyone to be trying to get tax breaks? We should be trying to pay down our debt. Reduce spending and keep or increase the collection of revenue. Don't cut revenue and keep spending the same. f^cking democrat.

The fact that you think any of this is a sign we're doing well means you're just a partisan hack.
victor809
8 years ago

You should be QUITE used to F*ckTards....you have to read my posts on cigarbid all the time. :-"

TCBY wrote:



fixed it for you.
Kawaksback
8 years ago

Whitehouse.gov?

LMFAO!

Is Joseph Goebbels still around?
I want to get the real story about the Nazis from him.

banderl wrote:



Hahah, Melting, melting

Waaaaaahhhhhh....Nazi's
Waaaaaahhhhhh....White Supremacist
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Racists
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Tax cuts for rich
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Undocumented not illegal
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Corporations evil
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Big Oil
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Stupid
Waaaaaahhhhhh....If you like your doctor
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Women and childrens gonna die
banderl
8 years ago

Hahah, Melting, melting

Waaaaaahhhhhh....Nazi's
Waaaaaahhhhhh....White Supremacist
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Racists
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Tax cuts for rich
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Undocumented not illegal
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Corporations evil
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Big Oil
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Stupid
Waaaaaahhhhhh....If you like your doctor
Waaaaaahhhhhh....Women and childrens gonna die

Kawaksback wrote:




Not surprisingly, my comment went right over your head.
victor809
8 years ago

Not surprisingly, my comment went right over your head.

banderl wrote:



I wouldn't expect anything else.
TMCTLT
8 years ago

pure tripe.
If Obama had claimed those same "historic accomplishments" you would have been calling for a revolution.
"most legislation passed"? If the bills are bad, is it really better that you pass more of them? If they're completely irrelevant, does it matter you've done a whole lot?

"most regulations nullified".... the same... it's a dumb measure because it assumes, with no proof, that removing the regulation is a good thing.

"most executive orders"? You f%%king moron. You were probably one of the people screaming bloody murder about how many executive orders obama signed. Now you're happy trump has signed more?

The tax law is a brilliant way to F%ck the Californians and new yorkers now, while waiting 8 years for an administration change to f%ck the rest of the middle class. To brag about it is idiotic. More importantly... do you really think now is the time for anyone to be trying to get tax breaks? We should be trying to pay down our debt. Reduce spending and keep or increase the collection of revenue. Don't cut revenue and keep spending the same. f^cking democrat.

The fact that you think any of this is a sign we're doing well means you're just a partisan hack.

victor809 wrote:




AWESOME SAUCE!!! You F*cktards and your super-dense welfare ridden ****-holes that the DNC obviously PREFERS over fly-over America. Thankfully our Founders had enough foresight ( and no doubt memory of what they left behind in Britain ) to give us the Electoral College to save the rest of the country from the Welfare dense Democratic voting ****-holes you seem to prefer.
banderl
8 years ago
The 10 states receiving the most in federal aid as a percentage of their general revenue, in order, were:

Mississippi, 42.9% federal aid as percentage of general revenue
Louisiana, 41.9%
Tennessee, 39.5%
South Dakota, 39.0%
Missouri, 38.2%
Montana, 37.4%
Georgia, 37.3%
New Mexico, 36.6%
Alabama, 36.1%
Maine, 35.3%

Kawaksback
8 years ago

Not surprisingly, my comment went right over your head.

banderl wrote:





Waaahhhh...CNN
Waaahhhh...MSNBC
Waaahhhh...NBC
Waaahhhh...All Media
Waaahhhh...Robert Gibbs
Waaahhhh...Jay Carney
Waaahhhh...Josh Ernest
Waaahhhh....Comey
Waaahhhh...Mueller
Waaahhh...Podesta
Waaahhh...Hezbollah
victor809
8 years ago

AWESOME SAUCE!!! You F*cktards and your super-dense welfare ridden ****-holes that the DNC obviously PREFERS over fly-over America. Thankfully our Founders had enough foresight ( and no doubt memory of what they left behind in Britain ) to give us the Electoral College to save the rest of the country from the Welfare dense Democratic voting ****-holes you seem to prefer.

TMCTLT wrote:



See... the party of trolling.
You're excited about a bill because it hurts people you don't like.

That doesn't make you a good person, or someone who makes decisions for the good of the country.

It makes you a troll. And a tool, because you're willing to get f%%ked in 8 years just so someone else can get f%%ked now.

Sad. Tool.
banderl
8 years ago

Waaahhhh...CNN
Waaahhhh...MSNBC
Waaahhhh...NBC
Waaahhhh...All Media
Waaahhhh...Robert Gibbs
Waaahhhh...Jay Carney
Waaahhhh...Josh Ernest
Waaahhhh....Comey
Waaahhhh...Mueller
Waaahhh...Podesta
Waaahhh...Hezbollah

Kawaksback wrote:




Wipe the orange off of your lips and get back to your special ed class.
My post had nothing to do with any of your nonsense.
victor809
8 years ago
The tools don't care about reality... it doesn't matter.

All that matters is that they are sure CA and NY are welfare states, and they gonna try to make sure they can screw them as much as possible. They'll even let trump take a turn at their butthole in 8 years just so it can happen.

Sad.
Kawaksback
8 years ago

The 10 states receiving the most in federal aid as a percentage of their general revenue, in order, were:

Mississippi, 42.9% federal aid as percentage of general revenue
Louisiana, 41.9%
Tennessee, 39.5%
South Dakota, 39.0%
Missouri, 38.2%
Montana, 37.4%
Georgia, 37.3%
New Mexico, 36.6%
Alabama, 36.1%
Maine, 35.3%

banderl wrote:



A new study from George Mason University’s Mercatus Center confirms what many of us already knew:
Liberal “blue states” are fiscally irresponsible.

In fact, 11 of the 14 least fiscally solvent states are also on the list of the “dirty dozen” most liberal blue states. In descending order of fiscal irresponsibility, from 50th to 37th, here’s the list of fiscal shame:


#50 ILLINOIS
#49 NEW JERSEY
#48 MASSACHUSETTS
#47 CONNECTICUT
#46 NEW YORK
#44 CALIFORNIA
#42 MAINE
#40 HAWAII
#39 VERMONT
#38 RHODE ISLAND
#37 MARYLAND

The 12th state in the “dirty dozen” list—Delaware—does not fare particularly well either, placing 30th out of the 50 states.

(In an article published on 4th of July, I offered a definition of these “dirty dozen” to include those states that gave President Obama more than 56.2 percent of the vote in the 2012 Presidential election.)

The Mercatus Center report ranked the 50 states “based on their fiscal solvency in five separate categories:”

(1) Cash solvency. Does a state have enough cash on hand to cover its short-term bills?
(2) Budget solvency. Can a state cover its fiscal year spending with current revenues? Or does it have a budget shortfall?
(3) Long-run solvency. Can a state meet its long-term spending commitments? Will there be enough money to cushion it from economic shocks or other long-term fiscal risks?
(4) Service-level solvency. How much fiscal “slack” does a state have to increase spending should citizens demand more services?
(5) Trust fund solvency. How much debt does a state have? How large are its unfunded pen­sion and health care liabilities?

The Mercatus Center report
One hundred and fifty years after the end of the Civil War, it is becoming increasingly clear that there are two Americas—one [consisting of the “Great 38 States” in flyover country which President Obama either lost or obtained less than 56.2 percent of the vote in the 2012 Presidential election] where the principles of constitutionally limited government and individual liberty are still revered, the other [those “dirty dozen” liberal blue states] where statism and the trampling of individual rights are on the rise.

The “dirty dozen” liberal blue states are headed towards the sort of fiscal insolvency now unraveling the country of Greece, and their fiscal recklessness may well drag down the entire federal government as well. All the more reason for the rest of us in the “Great 38 States” to consider convening an Assembly of the States so that fiscally responsible states can assert their sovereign rights guaranteed by the 10th amendment. Those sovereign rights include the right not to be forced to pay for another state’s profligacy


Poverty Rank City Democrat Since

1 Detroit, MI 1961
2 Buffalo, NY 1954
3 Cincinnati, OH 1984
4 Cleveland, OH 1989
5 Miami, FL forever
6 St. Louis, MO 1949
7 El Paso, TX forever
8 Milwaukee, WI 1908
9 Philadelphia, PA 1952
10 Newark, NJ 1907
victor809
8 years ago
You know a study is going to be completely honest and unbiased when it identifies the two groups as "the dirty dozen" and "the great 38".

Wow... you really aren't very clever.
jjanecka
8 years ago
victor809
8 years ago
Interestingly... if these states are run so fiscally unsoundly, at least they're using their own money to do so.

Meanwhile, you have no retort to the fact that the conservative states are taking money from the federal government, not putting it back in. The entire discussion is around federal taxes and their relationship to state taxes, and whether those states are "welfare states". The evidence shows that those states pay for themselves, and do NOT take nearly as much federal aid per capita as the flyover states.... it's the flyover states which are welfare states, taking more and putting less in to the federal governemnt. Those freeloaders should be taxed more.
victor809
8 years ago

Oprah 2020

jjanecka wrote:



I really f^king hope not.
She may win.... the orange f^^ktard needs to complete all 8 years.
TMCTLT
8 years ago

You know a study is going to be completely honest and unbiased when it identifies the two groups as "the dirty dozen" and "the great 38".

Wow... you really aren't very clever.

victor809 wrote:





There must be some REAL truth in what he laid down there.....shortest....less windiest reply from you to DATE.
So you take issue with the names given the two groups but admit that the information itself is correct?
banderl
8 years ago

A new study from George Mason University’s Mercatus Center confirms what many of us already knew:
Liberal “blue states” are fiscally irresponsible.

In fact, 11 of the 14 least fiscally solvent states are also on the list of the “dirty dozen” most liberal blue states. In descending order of fiscal irresponsibility, from 50th to 37th, here’s the list of fiscal shame:


#50 ILLINOIS
#49 NEW JERSEY
#48 MASSACHUSETTS
#47 CONNECTICUT
#46 NEW YORK
#44 CALIFORNIA
#42 MAINE
#40 HAWAII
#39 VERMONT
#38 RHODE ISLAND
#37 MARYLAND

The 12th state in the “dirty dozen” list—Delaware—does not fare particularly well either, placing 30th out of the 50 states.

(In an article published on 4th of July, I offered a definition of these “dirty dozen” to include those states that gave President Obama more than 56.2 percent of the vote in the 2012 Presidential election.)

The Mercatus Center report ranked the 50 states “based on their fiscal solvency in five separate categories:”

(1) Cash solvency. Does a state have enough cash on hand to cover its short-term bills?
(2) Budget solvency. Can a state cover its fiscal year spending with current revenues? Or does it have a budget shortfall?
(3) Long-run solvency. Can a state meet its long-term spending commitments? Will there be enough money to cushion it from economic shocks or other long-term fiscal risks?
(4) Service-level solvency. How much fiscal “slack” does a state have to increase spending should citizens demand more services?
(5) Trust fund solvency. How much debt does a state have? How large are its unfunded pen­sion and health care liabilities?

The Mercatus Center report
One hundred and fifty years after the end of the Civil War, it is becoming increasingly clear that there are two Americas—one [consisting of the “Great 38 States” in flyover country which President Obama either lost or obtained less than 56.2 percent of the vote in the 2012 Presidential election] where the principles of constitutionally limited government and individual liberty are still revered, the other [those “dirty dozen” liberal blue states] where statism and the trampling of individual rights are on the rise.

The “dirty dozen” liberal blue states are headed towards the sort of fiscal insolvency now unraveling the country of Greece, and their fiscal recklessness may well drag down the entire federal government as well. All the more reason for the rest of us in the “Great 38 States” to consider convening an Assembly of the States so that fiscally responsible states can assert their sovereign rights guaranteed by the 10th amendment. Those sovereign rights include the right not to be forced to pay for another state’s profligacy


Poverty Rank City Democrat Since

1 Detroit, MI 1961
2 Buffalo, NY 1954
3 Cincinnati, OH 1984
4 Cleveland, OH 1989
5 Miami, FL forever
6 St. Louis, MO 1949
7 El Paso, TX forever
8 Milwaukee, WI 1908
9 Philadelphia, PA 1952
10 Newark, NJ 1907

Kawaksback wrote:



How many of them have their hands out for Fed help?
RMAN4443
8 years ago

I hope we see another 4 years. We need to. Ideally I'd like the orange f%cktard to serve 12 years.
He needs to be around to see the results of his actions, or he'll just claim it isn't his fault and blame anyone else. The halfwits who voted for him need to feel the full repercussions of voting for an orange f%cktard with no grasp of reality, otherwise we'll have this happen again and again. The actions he has already taken will hurt them in the long term. He needs to still be in office when it does, or they'll blame a democrat and elect someone even stupider.

This president was a massive error in our system. Unless our nation learns a lesson from it, we will have another f^cktard again, possibly a worse one.

victor809 wrote:


Obama can't run again.........but I guess his wife could#-o
Users browsing this topic