Abrignac
7 years ago

It is not their job to produce a bill they and Trump can agree on. How can I be any clearer. You made a very direct statement that is incorrect.

Speyside wrote:



Go reread #25, then #42.
Speyside
7 years ago
It is not the job of congress to produce bills that Trump agrees to and signs. In fact they can over ride his veto, though in this case that will not happen. In not sure what you are hung up on, but in #25 you clearly stated that it was the job of Congress to produce a bill that Trump could agree to and sign. Categorically that is false. Then in #42 you show the mechanism of how that bill is passed. All of which is true. But there is no mechanism that forces Congress to create a bill that Trump agrees with and signs.
DrafterX
7 years ago
Cause Trump isn't really a President right..?? 😟
Speyside
7 years ago
Trump is president, we are not a Faschist country.
Speyside
7 years ago
Anthony, get your forms of government straight. In a Faschist society it is the job of the government it is the job of the governing bodies to create law the dictator wants. In a Communist society it is the job of the governing bodies to create laws that treat the people equally. It is not their job to create laws that their leader agrees to. In a Democracy it is the job of the governing bodies to create laws that benefit the people.

Z, there is nothing bipartisan about building a wall for Trump because he promised it to his base. Bipartisan is working toward the common good. Do you have any numbers to support the idea that the majority of Americans want a wall?
deadeyedick
7 years ago
Spey, maybe you don't live near the border and don't give a rat's ass. I believe the majority of US citizens want our government to control who we allow in and when. I have hunted, backpacked and hiked many areas in NM and AZ where the national parks have been degraded and trashed by migrants.

I also believe that the large majority support the view that a wall is effective in some areas where it is the best choice and cost effective to have one. There are many other options that also can and should be used depending on terrain, etc.

Have you ever been to the border? There are many areas where the only thing is a 3 strand wire fence that is often cut open and anyone can and do walk right through.

The Border Control authorities have been telling us for years that they have priority areas where better barriers are needed but maybe you just want this to be about Trump and HIS wall.
Abrignac
7 years ago

Anthony, get your forms of government straight. In a Faschist society it is the job of the government it is the job of the governing bodies to create law the dictator wants. In a Communist society it is the job of the governing bodies to create laws that treat the people equally. It is not their job to create laws that their leader agrees to. In a Democracy it is the job of the governing bodies to create laws that benefit the people.

Z, there is nothing bipartisan about building a wall for Trump because he promised it to his base. Bipartisan is working toward the common good. Do you have any numbers to support the idea that the majority of Americans want a wall?

Speyside wrote:




Let me connect the dots for you:

Trump shutdown? Highly unlikely. Here’s a Civics reminder for those who either forgot or are ignorant of the process.

The current spending resolution expires at midnight. Unless, Congress sends him a bill that he will sign it’s their fault. It’s that pesky thing called the Constitution.

Abrignac #19 wrote:



That or pass one where they have the votes to override his veto. That is there job, or so says the Constitution.

Abrignac #42 wrote:



1: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

2: Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.

Abrignac #42 wrote:



1-2-3:
1) All spending by the US government must be done so under authority of a federal law.

2) The Constitution specifically provides a path for an idea to be codified in law.

3) That path is:
- a) In this example a spending bill such as continuing resolution must originate in the US House of ---Representatives.
- b) Once the house passes their version it is sent to the US Senate for their review.
- c) Through a conference committee the US Senate and the US House of Representatives negotiate an agreeable --- version.
- d) The bill is sent to the President for his review
--- 1) If he agrees he signs it becomes law
--- 2) If he does not sign it within a specified period it becomes law
--- 3) If he chooses he can veto the bill, then send it back to Congress
- e) If the President vetos the bill
--- 1) Congress can throw their hands up in the air and blame the President, but that means they failed to use - ----- the tools the Constitution gives them to turn a bill into law that the President vetos.

No where have I said that Congress should do Trump's bidding.

What has happened is Congress sent Trump a bill that he will not sign, instead of completing the deliberative process, for which they do not have the votes to override a veto nor do they want to stay in session for the ten day period, the have cried foul.

If anyone is trying to force their will it is Congress. Instead of acting like a bunch of titty babies they should stay in session and do one of two things, give Trump a bill he will sign or write one that they can override a veto which will require them to work through the holidays. But, that won't happen because it would require BI-PARTISANSHIP which is virtually non-existent on Capital hill.

In the past we had bi-partisanship. Laws were passed as needed. We had actual budget laws instead of continuing resolutions. But, that has gone by the wayside. Too many special interest caucuses unwilling to compromise.

As I have said before this is a Congressional shut down.
ZRX1200
7 years ago

Z I don’t find the Dems clean. I could never be one. I’m just a republican who can’t justify what dolt 45 does just because I hate the Dems. I expect more out of my friends than my enemies.

Besides it is both sides that agreed on the CR. It is Trump who once again went back on his word and negotiated in bad faith following a rush inspired fever dream.

teedubbya wrote:




Again, he was told by congress twice that funding would be on the next CR and it wasn’t
ZRX1200
7 years ago
Here ya go Spey

Abrignac
7 years ago

Here ya go Spey

ZRX1200 wrote:



See post #19

Seems he didn't see before.
Abrignac
7 years ago
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer addressed President Donald Trump while speaking on the Senate floor Saturday, saying, "President Trump, if you want to open the government, you must abandon the wall – plain and simple.”

So it's ok for Schumer to tell Trump he can't have a wall, but it's not ok for Trump to say he won't sign without wall funding?
delta1
7 years ago
This should not have gotten here...

with the GOP controlling the Congress and occupying the WH, they should've been able to get together and put forward a budget bill that satisfied Trump, the GOP and with some incentives, to get the needed votes among purple state/right leaning Dems, for Senate approval...

GOP had nearly two years of almost total control, and proved they are better at obstruction than governing...the reality is that the tail of the GOP, a small fraction of extreme right wingers who represent a small fraction of Americans, wags the dog...
Abrignac
7 years ago

This should not have gotten here..

delta1 wrote:



Your statement is 100% correct.
delta1
7 years ago
all this talk about Congress having to work with POTUS, especially from the cons, though, is hypocritical ...

and downright laughable, especially since they have a majority in Congress, for a few more days...


..it was only three to 9 years ago.... remember how much help the GOP controlled Congress gave Obama?

"Single most important thing we want to achieve is for Obama to be a one-term president" ... who, from which party, said that?
Abrignac
7 years ago
Newly elected New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a self-described Democratic socialist, called for a furlough of congressional salaries in the event of another government shutdown on Saturday.

“It’s completely unacceptable that members of Congress can force a government shutdown on partisan lines & then have Congressional salaries exempt from that decision,” she wrote on Twitter. “Have some integrity.”

Finally something learned from her.
Abrignac
7 years ago

all this talk about Congress having to work with POTUS, especially from the cons, though, is hypocritical ...

and downright laughable, especially since they have a majority in Congress, for a few more days...


..it was only three to 9 years ago.... remember how much help the GOP controlled Congress gave Obama?

"Single most important thing we want to achieve is for Obama to be a one-term president" ... who, from which party, said that?

delta1 wrote:



No disagreement. Unfortunately, since neither party in Congress will cross the aisle this is where we are. Neither, party is immune from criticism.
ZRX1200
7 years ago
Schumer voted or a wall in 06
Abrignac
7 years ago

Schumer voted or a wall in 06

ZRX1200 wrote:



Watching C-SPAN right now. They just issued a breaking news statement. Schumer is meeting with Pence, but he stated from the onset that he would not discuss wall funding at that meeting.

Yet, Trump is the bully.
tailgater
7 years ago
Close the gov for a year.

Re institute only what we truly missed.



Abrignac
7 years ago
Jan 23, 2018 7:17 PM EST

WASHINGTON — Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer on Tuesday pulled back an offer of $25 billion for President Donald Trump’s long-promised southern border wall, as lawmakers scrambled to figure out how to push a deal to protect 700,000 or more so-called Dreamer immigrants from deportation.
Users browsing this topic