Using the trump logic he simply didn't do it. there was no BJ

When you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

True... True... 😟

didn't Billy boy say oral sex wasn't adultery according to the Bible??....:-k

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/01/26/time/kirn.html 

Exactly. And we have decided if someone did something wrong before it makes it right now rather than wrong all the time. Clinton cleared the way for a lot of wrong doing.

to Victor goes the spoils, or something like that.

I bet a lot of stuff gets on Victor... 😟

Mostly just the panties women throw at me.

the Mueller Report lists ten separate instances of obstruction of justice, in great detail, with specific underlying evidence....but I doubt any Trump automaton will read the Mueller report to see the compelling arguments laid out against their idol...

however, some may be willing to check out an abbreviated summary.....there is a decent summary in Wikipedia, which lists each of the ten Obstruction of Justice charges against Trump that are laid out in the Mueller report...if Trump's base can be objective for just 5 minutes, they'll learn that the pablum they've been fed by Trump and his media is just empty calories...

but if they continue to repeat back what Trump says "no collusion, no obstruction (notice he doesn't say "total exoneration" anymore) they have gone back for extra helpings of the kool-aid...

from Wikipedia:

"2.3 Episodes of alleged obstruction
2.3.1 Trump campaign's response to Russian support
2.3.2 President's conduct in Michael Flynn investigation
2.3.3 President's reaction to the FBI's Russia investigation being publicized
2.3.4 Dismissal of James Comey
2.3.5 President's efforts to remove the special counsel
2.3.6 President's efforts to curtail the Special Counsel investigation
2.3.7 President's efforts to prevent disclosures about Trump Tower meeting
2.3.8 President's efforts to have Attorney General control investigation
2.3.9 President orders McGahn to deny reports
2.3.10 President's pressuring of Flynn, Manafort, and "redacted name"
2.3.11 President's pressuring of Michael Cohen"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_Report 

I think everyone's gonna have to plead guilty to purgatory at some point, if that's the way it really works. 🤔

It all looks pretty minor Delta... Definitely not a crime or misdemeanor.. comments taken out of context most likely.. 😟

my bad.
corrected version: To Victor Goes The Soiled.

Mueller said that they would have charged anyone else who did what Trump did, but because of the DOJ policy prohibiting indicting a sitting POTUS, he referred his findings to Congress...


guessing that Drafter won't bother reading the Wikipedia summary of the Mueller Report, let alone the report itself...he's such an automaton...

So Mueller let Trump off the hook because he was Constitutionally barred from charging a sitting POTUS with a crime, why was his inner circle not charged?
Surely Ivanka, Don Jr., Jared Kushner, et al, would have been implicated somehow, in the conspiracy, obstruction, or collusion if Trump was...pretty hard not to be involved, if your at all the meetings:-k

When did the Mueller say that..?? 😕

I was at a Meeting once where some dudes started smoking pot... It didn't end well... 😞

Rmann here is an idea for you. Read the report. Lol.

not specifically Constitutionally barred, but it's a policy of the DOJ that seems to hold sway here, interpreting the Constitution's checks and balances with the objective to protect the POTUS from frivolous indictments that could tie up the executive branch...

he described each of their activities in the Mueller report, including contacts and meetings and lies about contacts and meetings with Russians, but concluded that there was insufficient evidence that they engaged in a criminal conspiracy...Mueller concluded that Trump's campaign members were aware that Russian government operatives were engaging in activities to interfere with the election, they were aware that the Russians wanted to help Trump win and cause Hillary to lose...

Mueller's Report concluded that Trump's campaign encouraged the Russians ("Russia, if you're listening") and wanted to work with them (if it's what you say it is, I love it) but their activities in furtherance of that objective didn't rise to the level of sufficient evidence of criminal conspiracy.

Trump's peeps like to get their "facts" directly from the teats of Trump and his media...they don't need no stinkin truth...

as of March, 5 people involved in Trump's campaign and/or administration have been convicted, Roger Stone could make 6.
and close to 30 more (including Russian Nationalists and Russian Intelligence personnel) have not had their fates decided.

names like Manafort etc. are well known.