frankj1
7 years ago

Here's my overlook and point about the O.P..^^^^

IF YOUR NOT A U.S. CITIZEN....THEN WHY THE FUUUUUK
ARE YOU GETTING A CENSUS FORM?

Mr. Jones wrote:


to determine how many currently live here, not how many citizens comprise the USA
View All Posts by User
Mr. Jones
7 years ago
That's way too logical frank!!!


I don't believe it....

Does it come addressed to them by name?
If so, they already k,ow they are there...
Why ask them again?

What I really wanna know is...

Has anyone's SOCIAL SECURITY # BEEN USED BY MANY ILLEGALS AND NOW AT RETIREMENT YOUR GOING TO GET THE MAXIMUM IN SOCIAL SECURITY BENE'S EVEN THOUGH YOU ONLY MADE $20K EACH YEAR OF YOUR ENTIRE LIFE...BUT NOW YOUR GETTING THE BENE'S
$$$ AMOUNT THE A $250K LIFER SHOULD GET?
View All Posts by User
tailgater
7 years ago



I understand why the GOP believes in the benefit for them


frankj1 wrote:



I'll bite: Why?

And don't say "because some dead guy had conversations with Trump"

I mean "why?"
As in "How does the GOP benefit?" (in their eyes).

View All Posts by User
tailgater
7 years ago


The census determines the total population and population geographically, not by legality.

.

frankj1 wrote:



Not true.

The census is given to every legal residence.

People here illegally are not provided a census form.

This isn't opinion.

View All Posts by User
frankj1
7 years ago

I'll bite: Why?

And don't say "because some dead guy had conversations with Trump"

I mean "why?"
As in "How does the GOP benefit?" (in their eyes).

tailgater wrote:


I'm gonna assume you're kidding at this point.
How about you tell all the readers what the GOP thinks would be the benefit of following the advice of the consultant this time?
View All Posts by User
frankj1
7 years ago

Not true.

The census is given to every legal residence.

People here illegally are not provided a census form.

This isn't opinion.

tailgater wrote:


never said otherwise.

does every member of your household receive an individual form to fill out, or just the head of the household?
I can't recall from 10 years ago, but it feels like I was expected to list all living at my address.
could be wrong, possibly.

for our more recent Town Census I had to remove a name or 3 as the Town was never notified. If my sister-in-law had taken up residence in my basement (as threatened), I would have added her...figuring that's the info they want. Wouldn't make her an eligible voter here or anything like that. But depending on her age, it might affect the way the town gets cut up for different elementary schools. Much more info than that would be superfluous, even though it may be real data. Just not needed for the purposes of the census.

you have made this more complicated than the simple issue requires...never would have made the Supreme Court with all of your conditions you want me to explain.


real question though, what makes a residence not legal?
I understand under a bridge and stuff, but wouldn't any existing address receive a census form?
View All Posts by User
frankj1
7 years ago

That's way too logical frank!!!


I don't believe it....

Does it come addressed to them by name?
If so, they already k,ow they are there...
Why ask them again?

What I really wanna know is...

Has anyone's SOCIAL SECURITY # BEEN USED BY MANY ILLEGALS AND NOW AT RETIREMENT YOUR GOING TO GET THE MAXIMUM IN SOCIAL SECURITY BENE'S EVEN THOUGH YOU ONLY MADE $20K EACH YEAR OF YOUR ENTIRE LIFE...BUT NOW YOUR GETTING THE BENE'S
$$$ AMOUNT THE A $250K LIFER SHOULD GET?

Mr. Jones wrote:


can't help ya there. I'm only responsible to explain to tail why his party thought the question would benefit them...even though I think they overrated said benefit.
View All Posts by User
frankj1
7 years ago

Not true.

The census is given to every legal residence.

People here illegally are not provided a census form.

This isn't opinion.

tailgater wrote:


wait! you're saying they already know who is legal and who is not?
they even know where the illegals reside?
then the whole issue is dumber than dumb.

I gave the GOP too much credit, I guess.
View All Posts by User
teedubbya
7 years ago
I think the most important thing we learned here is that a Supreme Court ruling should be considered more of a suggestion and is optional.
View All Posts by User
frankj1
7 years ago

I think the most important thing we learned here is that a Supreme Court ruling should be considered more of a suggestion and is optional.

teedubbya wrote:


weird that reason two was not used as reason one...

wish I had more do-overs in my life.

probably makes me more like everyone.
View All Posts by User
victor809
7 years ago
Seriously... The last 50 posts are misdirection.

The supreme Court ruled. The question is not whether the question should be allowed or is going to help one party over another.

The question is whether you're ok with the idiot in Chief directly disobeying the SC ruling
View All Posts by User
frankj1
7 years ago
well why didn't you say so?
View All Posts by User
tailgater
7 years ago

Seriously... The last 50 posts are misdirection.

The supreme Court ruled. The question is not whether the question should be allowed or is going to help one party over another.

The question is whether you're ok with the idiot in Chief directly disobeying the SC ruling

victor809 wrote:



I've already answered that one.
I'm not OK with it.
View All Posts by User
DrafterX
7 years ago
Trump disobeyed the SC..?? There should be outrage... 😟
View All Posts by User
frankj1
7 years ago

I've already answered that one.
I'm not OK with it.

tailgater wrote:


yeah, me too...but he hasn't actually defied them yet, has he? Just threatened?
I'm under the impression that the first batch printed do not have the question added.
View All Posts by User
frankj1
7 years ago

Trump disobeyed the SC..?? There should be outrage... 😟

DrafterX wrote:


finally got the freeloaders from the 4th out of your house?

if they stayed much longer you'd be adding them to the census!
View All Posts by User
DrafterX
7 years ago
🤣
They left yesterday.. had a dozen extra people sleeping in my house for a few days...
View All Posts by User
frankj1
7 years ago

🤣
They left yesterday.. had a dozen extra people sleeping in my house for a few days...

DrafterX wrote:


do you mind if I ask what everyone wants to know...were they citizens of the USA?
View All Posts by User
victor809
7 years ago

yeah, me too...but he hasn't actually defied them yet, has he? Just threatened?
I'm under the impression that the first batch printed do not have the question added.

frankj1 wrote:



It's unclear in my mind what has happened and what has not.... partially because the administration has given conflicting statements. Because one of them is an absolute idiot.

The most recent change is the complete changeover of the lawyers representing the US in the court.... apparently they are now a team of commerce lawyers, which is odd.

As of the 4th, the trumpenfurher was saying he was still working on getting the question in the census... but that may be "working" in a legal manner.

He's claimed he will make an "add-on" which seems odd to me.... not sure how that would work...
View All Posts by User
frankj1
7 years ago

It's unclear in my mind what has happened and what has not.... partially because the administration has given conflicting statements. Because one of them is an absolute idiot.

The most recent change is the complete changeover of the lawyers representing the US in the court.... apparently they are now a team of commerce lawyers, which is odd.

As of the 4th, the trumpenfurher was saying he was still working on getting the question in the census... but that may be "working" in a legal manner.

He's claimed he will make an "add-on" which seems odd to me.... not sure how that would work...

victor809 wrote:


the add-on did sound nuts.
think I read he was considering a separate mailing addendum just for The Question.
View All Posts by User
Users browsing this topic
Mobile! Terms | Privacy | Contact Us | Help | © 1998-2026, CigarBid.com