.... That's an odd position to take. I really would recommend using data to develop things you believe to be facts rather than just opinion.

victor809 wrote:

Saying any efforts to control guns leads to confiscation is just a trick to stop even the most reasonable controls.

It is “beer leads to heroin” argument parents use when they want their kid to grow up to be accountants....

Brewha wrote:

Careful now.

I warn you that believing is seeing.

Brewha wrote:

I believe they want to control guns to eventually confiscate them the left is the one with the trick up their sleeve

If reasonable people perpose reasonable ideas I would listen

The left are unreasonable wither they know it or not

Unloader wrote:

If it looks like a duck swims like a duck and quacks like a duck then it probably is a duck

Careful now cause seeing is believing

Unloader wrote:

What about background check and permitting strikes you as unreasonable?

Brewha wrote:

Brewha, background checks and permits?

Tell me what we already have kind sir......

I think you should have to ask Tittmus for permission to exercise your first amendment rights.

ZRX1200 wrote:

First thing, requiring a permit to exercise a Constitutional right is an infringement on that right. Would you be OK with requiring a permit to exercise your 1st Amendment right, or how about the 4th, 6th, 13th, 19th or 24th? How about requiring a government issued permit to vote? I'm not talking about a photo ID, but requiring that you obtain the government's permission before you are permitted to vote, as well as a back ground check to make sure you are mentally competent. I mean it's just a common sense approach to make sure only qualified, mentally competent Citizens vote, right? Why would any rational person be against that? No one would be trying to take away your right to vote, we would just be putting some common sense restrictions on that right.

David

Mrs. dpnewell wrote: