I have no problem with people declining the vaccination at this point- so long as they aren't harming others who are vaccinated, although my personal belief, which I am not imposing on anyone, is otherwise

rfenst wrote:

If you are vaccinated and have the magic shield of immunity, how are those not vaccinated harming those that are?

BuckyB93 wrote:

If you are vaccinated and have the magic shield of immunity, how are those not vaccinated harming those that are? Generally, they are not as of now.

If you've had it or have been exposed to it and your natural immunity fought if off, is that not as effective as getting the experimental injections? IDK. Maybe yes, maybe no. Time will tell. Is the man made "cure" that was created in the past year better than mother nature that's been doing it for the past (1)98.2 thousands of years? IDK. Maybe yes, maybe no.

BuckyB93 wrote:

If you are vaccinated and have the magic shield of immunity, how are those not vaccinated harming those that are?

If you've had it or have been exposed to it and your natural immunity fought if off, is that not as effective as getting the experimental injections? Is the man made "cure" that was created in the past year better than mother nature that's been doing it for the past (1)98.2 thousands of years?

BuckyB93 wrote:

This x1000, yet none of those vaccinated seem to have a straight forward answer……

Plowboy221 wrote:

They could have children to young to be vaccinated.

Brewha wrote:

I’m starting to see it as the conservative tag line; Hooray for me, and to hell with you!

Brewha wrote:

They could have children to young to be vaccinated.

Brewha wrote:

“Would some one please think about the children!!!” [gonzo]

Brewha wrote:

It's tragic what they do to children, suffocate them with masks and shoot them up with experimental cocktails.:-&

RayR wrote:

They could have children to young to be vaccinated.

Brewha wrote:

Most healthy kids and middle aged people are not in the high risk population but there is still constant pressure to inject them with an "emergency use only" vaccine concoction.

People say the long term risks of getting vax outweighs the long term risks of the virus itself.

Since the virus only entered the human population about 2 years ago and the vax only has been in use for less than a year... how can the "experts" come to that conclusion? There is NO data on long term effects from either the cause, nor the "cure."

This is fact, not opinion.

BuckyB93 wrote:

Science bad, fire good!

bgz wrote:

Actually no one says that. Totally Made Up.

Ok, Ok, I’ll give you that Tucker Carlson might have said it - but since he speaks with his anus it doesn’t really count.



“There is no data on long term effects…” and of course some rationalize this to mean the vaccine is “more risk than the virus”. Because they insist that no one knows anything, science and medicine are fake, and so on. That’s why a savior is needed - and some even accept Trump (lol).

Brewha wrote:

You must live in a bubble. I'd provide sources for you but you can search it for yourself*


* this is the same answer I get from the "experts" when I ask them to name one other vaccine that has been approved for use on humans using mRNA technology. That question has yet to be answered here in the discussions. The only answer I get from the "experts" is that I'm too stupid to understand it or I'm not asking the "right" questions. I know it's a stupid cigar forum, but any other forum will still come up empty.

So I'll pose you the same question - name one other vaccine that uses the mRNA technology that has been approved for use in humans by the FDA or any other official organization on the planet Earth.

BuckyB93 wrote:

Most healthy kids and middle aged people are not in the high risk population but there is still constant pressure to inject them with an "emergency use only" vaccine concoction.

People say the long term risks of getting vax outweighs the long term risks of the virus itself.

Since the virus only entered the human population about 2 years ago and the vax only has been in use for less than a year... how can the "experts" come to that conclusion? There is NO data on long term effects from either the cause, nor the "cure."

This is fact, not opinion.

BuckyB93 wrote: