RobertHively
2 years ago
Is this the Trump thread?


Trump To Address Libertarian Convention In Move That Has Members Debating Merits

"Donald Trump will address the Libertarian Party national convention, in a move that promises publicity for America's largest "third party" while giving Trump an opportunity to shake some non-uniparty votes in his direction.

At the same time, however, Trump puts himself at risk of enduring hostile elements in the crowd, aimed at a candidate with many decidedly non-libertarian tendencies. Trump's pending appearance has also exacerbated some divisions within the Libertarian Party, with some members are questioning the wisdom and propriety of putting Trump in the Libertarian spotlight, and others saying it's a smart move for multiple reasons."

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-address-libertarian-convention-move-has-members-debating-merits 



I guess he hopes they have short memories? Better yet, no memory at all
8trackdisco
2 years ago

Is this the Trump thread?


Trump To Address Libertarian Convention In Move That Has Members Debating Merits

"Donald Trump will address the Libertarian Party national convention, in a move that promises publicity for America's largest "third party" while giving Trump an opportunity to shake some non-uniparty votes in his direction.

At the same time, however, Trump puts himself at risk of enduring hostile elements in the crowd, aimed at a candidate with many decidedly non-libertarian tendencies. Trump's pending appearance has also exacerbated some divisions within the Libertarian Party, with some members are questioning the wisdom and propriety of putting Trump in the Libertarian spotlight, and others saying it's a smart move for multiple reasons."

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-address-libertarian-convention-move-has-members-debating-merits 



I guess he hopes they have short memories? Better yet, no memory at all

RobertHively wrote:




Trump thread? In the manner of posting what he says, whether people posting here (especially vowed Trump supporters) either agreeing or disagreeing with what he says.

That was the intent in creating this thread.
RobertHively
2 years ago
^

So this isn't like the Joe Sanostra thread where we post articles?

If not, I'm going to create an "🍊 MENG" thread
8trackdisco
2 years ago

^

So this isn't like the Joe Sanostra thread where we post articles?

If not, I'm going to create an "🍊 MENG" thread

RobertHively wrote:



Rock on wit yo bad sef!
Mr. Jones
2 years ago
Cheeto
Never
Does
What
He
Says
Speyside2
2 years ago
I disagree with him.
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago

Is this the Trump thread?


Trump To Address Libertarian Convention In Move That Has Members Debating Merits

"Donald Trump will address the Libertarian Party national convention, in a move that promises publicity for America's largest "third party" while giving Trump an opportunity to shake some non-uniparty votes in his direction.

At the same time, however, Trump puts himself at risk of enduring hostile elements in the crowd, aimed at a candidate with many decidedly non-libertarian tendencies. Trump's pending appearance has also exacerbated some divisions within the Libertarian Party, with some members are questioning the wisdom and propriety of putting Trump in the Libertarian spotlight, and others saying it's a smart move for multiple reasons."

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-address-libertarian-convention-move-has-members-debating-merits 



I guess he hopes they have short memories? Better yet, no memory at all

RobertHively wrote:




This appears to be a strategy that could produce massive dividends. Remember when He asked Blacks, ‘What the hell do you have to lose?’.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/08/19/politics/donald-trump-african-american-voters/index.html 

Then increased his turnout in 2020. I believe America saw what he did as President and they believed him. There's polling out that shows an increase over his 2020 turnout. With RFK Jr. sidestepping the Libertarian Party it's going to shortchange them in the viable category. Sure rabid diehards are willing to pull the lever, but there's the rub of giving Biden a 2nd term and that to me is a "Danger Will Robinson, Danger!" warning that we all see that must not be allowed. His lockdown, energy killing, mandated govt. agency power grabs, anti 2nd Amendment, Green New Deal pie in the sky, Border invasion, Ukraine-Iran-Israel funding wars, DEI initiatives into insanity, gender reassignment for children...look, I can go on and on and on about the creep and the choice is obvious whom I will be voting for. There's NEVER going to be a perfect candidate for the job. Ever. I will gladly vote for Trump over Biden each and every day of the week because (while he wasn't my preferred choice back in 2016 I saw and paid attention to how he chose to govern) he did win me over. I never thought he would run as close a true Conservative and maintain once in power. Are there things I wish he'd change? Yeah. I view him more pliable than Pedo Joe. That guy has been, not my words..."I think he has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades,” and the entire World cannot endure more of his leadership nor his Vice President's as she will assume office if he does win a 2nd term. God help us all. This isn't some Left/Right debate. This is a real introspect into how you view the 2 styles and background on how they both governed. The difference is staggering. Whom among the Left can really say on record that they want more Biden? For their own livelihood, their children and grandchildren and for the World?

Trust me, mean tweets aren't that bad in comparison. The lawfare being employed by the Biden Administration in concerted effort in Blue strongholds were designed to take his messaging and campaigning offline are all something you're willing to forgive and allow. If they can do it to a former President worth billions, there's NOTHING stopping them from going after you. They will too.
8trackdisco
2 years ago
Trump said.....

Crooked Joe Biden is the worst president ever.

Myopia usually overpowers reality, and around here, history passes for whar was said on Fox News last week.

Is he the worst ever?
If he isn't, who would be your nominee? And, Why?

RayR
2 years ago

Trump said.....

Crooked Joe Biden is the worst president ever.

Myopia usually overpowers reality, and around here, history passes for whar was said on Fox News last week.

Is he the worst ever?
If he isn't, who would be your nominee? And, Why?

8trackdisco wrote:



Trump was just kidding.

Joe Biden can't be the worst president ever. The worst presidents ever ranked by Boobus Americanus, lefty and neocon academics, and the media are those they will rank as the best presidents eva! At the top of the heap, you will find Lincoln and FDR because they caused the greatest economic calamities and got the most Americans killed on their watch.
Biden has been working hard at causing the economic calamity part and getting Americans killed, but he's a piker compared to Lincoln and FDR.
Perhaps if Biden starts WWIII or a civil war then he could make it to the best worst president ever.


8trackdisco
2 years ago
So.. no takers on whether is the worst president ever.

Just another thing Trump says, and you need to stay onsides with him, so the non answer has to suffice.

Fair enough.





8trackdisco
2 years ago
Today's installment. Although technicallyhe made the comment on Tuesday.

Subject: Trump on Prosecuting Political Opponents

"It's a terrible, terrible path that they're leading us to, and it's very possible that it's going to have to happen to them."


Trumpers,
Come on down!

Do you agree with what Trump said today?
HockeyDad
2 years ago
Prosecuting political opponents should only be done by the Democrats. Republicans should continue their strategy of honorably losing.

This will expedite our path to the inevitable one-party socialist nation.
JGRAZ
2 years ago
Apparently what's good for the Goose is good for the gander.
Do I agree? NO. It's a path to ruination that as a country in general we may not return from. Unfortunately a precedent has been set by the Dems.

Honestly what is needed is a clean slate across the board, but that will never happen.
8trackdisco
2 years ago

Prosecuting political opponents should only be done by the Democrats. Republicans should continue their strategy of honorably losing.

This will expedite our path to the inevitable one-party socialist nation.

HockeyDad wrote:



About what I expected. Your max is one honest response per day. Deflect, and counter with a banal dull edge, and ditch.

Hoped for better.
8trackdisco
2 years ago

Apparently what's good for the Goose is good for the gander.
Do I agree? NO.

JGRAZ wrote:



A legit answer. Thank you.
It’s a race the bottom and both sides are going to win it.
HockeyDad
2 years ago

About what I expected. Your max is one honest response per day. Deflect, and counter with a banal dull edge, and ditch.

Hoped for better.

8trackdisco wrote:



You got the answer you were fishing for and now you don’t like it? The democrats opened the Pandora’s Box. You want the Republicans to close it and take some sort of perceived “high road”. This is why I bet with the democrats and big tech. They are still the casino.

Recognizing the race to the bottom is a good step towards acceptance.
8trackdisco
2 years ago
The whole reason for this thread was to either agree or disagree with what Trump says. His own words and do you support his statement.

So yes. I am asking if you agree with the low road path he is suggesting, or a higher road.


jeebling
2 years ago

Today's installment. Although technicallyhe made the comment on Tuesday.

Subject: Trump on Prosecuting Political Opponents

"It's a terrible, terrible path that they're leading us to, and it's very possible that it's going to have to happen to them."


Trumpers,
Come on down!

Do you agree with what Trump said today?

8trackdisco wrote:



I agree that it a terrible path the Dems are on. I agree that it is possible that the Dems may find themselves on the receiving end of political lawfare.
Is that the question you’re asking?
8trackdisco
2 years ago
It's a terrible, terrible path that they're leading us to, and it's very possible that it's going to have to happen to them."

‘Very Possible’ being a shabbily veiled threat to go after the Dems because he feels wronged by his trial.

He has to be president first. Once there, he could Very Possibly make his Very Possible come true.

Do you support him to do that?
(Or)
Do you feel that is the wrong thing to do?
HockeyDad
2 years ago
Former President Donald Trump said Wednesday that Americans don’t want to see President Biden indicted when he leaves office, suggesting that he won’t seek retribution for the criminal cases leveled against him if he’s elected to the White House in November.

Trump, 77, alleged that the 81-year-old president and his administration have engaged in “tremendous criminality” related to the indictments brought against him since announcing his White House run and argued that it would be “easy” to go after Biden with the full force of the Justice Department while downplaying his interest in doing so.

“We can’t have this stuff go on,” the presumptive Republican nominee for president told Fox News host Sean Hannity, referring to GOP claims that the Biden administration has been engaging in lawfare to stymie his presidential campaign.

“Because you know what? When Biden goes out and everyone says, ‘Bye bye,’ and then he gets indicted two days later — the country doesn’t want that,” Trump said.

“They didn’t want it with Hillary Clinton either,” the former president continued, noting that he didn’t use the DOJ to go after the former secretary of state despite his supporters clamoring for him to “lock her up” on the 2016 campaign trail.
Users browsing this topic