wheelrite
15 years ago
Just Barak and 3000 close friends.

$200 mil a day...


where's my cake ???


wheel,
DadZilla3
15 years ago
Amazing. Absolutely amazing.
rfenst
15 years ago

Amazing. Absolutely amazing.

DadZilla3 wrote:




Some one has got to see where all the jobs have gone to...
donutboy2000
15 years ago
Yet another example of the Democrat Culture of Corruption !
DadZilla3
15 years ago
I can't quite decide what's more repugnant...Obama blowing 2 billion dollars on a ten day holiday to India, or the American mainstream media for giving him a total free pass about it.
MCAddict
15 years ago
LEMON CURRY?
JadeRose
15 years ago
Hey screw you guys......he promised to bring me back some Lamb Madras and some Naan.
wheelrite
15 years ago

Hey screw you guys......he promised to bring me back some Lamb Madras and some Naan.

JadeRose wrote:




and a Dot your the Midget's forehead
wheelrite
15 years ago
^ FOR your midget's head...
DrafterX
15 years ago
Is he taking Oprah..?? 😕
wheelrite
15 years ago


Nov 04, 2010
Obama's India trip -- not as expensive as you may have heard
11:56 AMYahoo! BuzzShare
DiggNewsvineRedditE-mailSavePrintShare1772,191 Comments

37 Recommend India gets ready for President Obama's visit.
CAPTIONBy MANPREET ROMANA, AFP/Getty ImagesNo, President Obama's trip is not going to cost $200 million a day.

That figure -- first thrown out by a single Indian media outlet and now viral on conservative talk radio -- is wildly off the mark.

The problem is that the costs for these trips are impossible to determine, for many of the president's expenses would be incurred whether he was visiting India or Atlanta or simply hanging around the White House. Obama's India trip starts an Asian swing that includes South Korea, Indonesia and Japan.

The administration isn't inclined to detail costs, most of which deal with security.

"The numbers reported in this article have no basis in reality," said White House spokesman Tommy Vietor. "Due to security concerns, we are unable to outline details associated with security procedures and costs, but it's safe to say these numbers are wildly inflated."

To be sure, these trips do cost millions of dollars per day.

Whenever a president travels, he or she takes a mini-White House with them, from bulletproof limousines to gaggles of aides. This can come in awfully handy when trouble happens, such as the terrorist attacks on 9/11 when George W. Bush was in Florida. Ronald Reagan was traveling in Asia when the Chernobyl nuclear plant in what was then the Soviet Union blew up in 1986.

Foreign trips are expensive but are a staple of presidential duties. India is a rising economy power. It is next to -- and has an intense rivalry with -- one of the world's most dangerous countries, Pakistan. It can be a counterweight to threats from China. Any president is going to deal with India.

Indonesia is the world's largest Muslim majority nation. South Korea is the site of a G-20 global economic summit. Japan is hosting the annual Asian economic summit, which Obama's predecessors also attended. There's no evidence that Obama's team is spending any more money than its predecessors, taking inflation into account.

Yes, these gigs will cost money. But $200 million a day? Not even close.

One other thing to keep in mind: The Secret Service is not going to let anything happen to a president overseas if they can help it. They're going to do -- and spend -- whatever it takes. That's just a fact of life.

One last thing: The media organizations accompanying Obama will pay their own expenses.


Um,,

This article says nothing...

This trip is in poor taste at best and a thumb in the eye of Tax payer..


wheel,

rfenst
15 years ago

This trip is in poor taste at best and a thumb in the eye of Tax payer.

wheelrite wrote:







OK, so we now all know that the $200 million/day figure is a load of crap. No big surprise.
But why is the trip in"in poor taste" and how is it "a thumb in the eye of Tax payer"?
:-k
wheelrite
15 years ago

OK, so we now all know that the $200 million/day figure is a load of crap. No big surprise.
But why is the trip in"in poor taste" and how is it "a thumb in the eye of Tax payer"?
:-k

rfenst wrote:




Robert,
nowhere in that article did it refute the cost .
There is no plausible reason for Obama and his posse to go globe trotting while our country is in economic turmoil.

It looks bad to those of us who pay taxes..
tailgater
15 years ago
"Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency"
-- BHO, January 21, 2009



"we are unable to outline details associated with security procedures and costs..."
--White House spokesman Tommy Vietor.


Hey Tommy. We don't need details on how the security is handled. We just want to know the price.

Hey Barack. Shove it!


rfenst
15 years ago
😉

Robert,
nowhere in that article did it refute the cost .
There is no plausible reason for Obama and his posse to go globe trotting while our country is in economic turmoil.

It looks bad to those of us who pay taxes..

wheelrite wrote:






Since we both know you can and did read the article, I just don't understand how you can say those things about your article?

1. The $2 billion figure appears to be bull-****.
2. Meeting with important allies and trading partners certainly cannot hurt our economic picture.
3. Attending large, important world economic sumits is a good thing for any President to do.

I know it looks bad to you because you despise Obama and his political agenda. But, I also know that if Obama declared that he didn't think his trip was important enough to go on, you would be even angrier and more vocal.


DrafterX
15 years ago
😕 Is he taking his puppy-dog..??
HockeyDad
15 years ago
US Presidents go globtrotting all the time. It is part of the job.

(Maybe he will outsource the White House operations!)
DrafterX
15 years ago
Obama played for the Globetrotters..??😕
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago
He's going there with a tincup in his hand. He's going there to beg. Remember, with the balance of power controlled by his party he could've repealed NAFTA. That would've signaled that America won't offshore jobs. They didn't do a damn thing. It's not even on his radar.



Obama message in India: Jobs, jobs, jobs
Friday, November 05, 2010
By Laura Rozen, Politico
When President Barack Obama arrives in Mumbai Saturday on his first presidential trip to India, he'll begin a tightly choreographed three-day visit designed not only to deepen the alliance between the world's two largest democracies but to telegraph a message of U.S. jobs and economic opportunities from expanded U.S.-India trade ties to a struggling American audience back home.

Indeed, when the White House previewed Obama's upcoming India trip last week, "jobs" and "jobs back here" were mentioned 17 times by White House aides.

"Indian companies are the second-fastest-growing investors in the United States and they ??? now support about 57,000 jobs here in the U.S.," said Michael Froman, deputy national security adviser for international economic affairs. "So it's a great market for U.S. exports," as well as a "good source of investment for the United States. ... And that's the reason why the president will be there."

The "trip is basically economic in focus," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs echoed. "I think when people see the first day of this, they'll understand that ??? our relationship with this region of the world and with this country is not disconnected in any way from what's important to them in our ability to export our goods, to sell those products and to create and support jobs here in America."

To amplify that point, Obama will speak upon his arrival at a U.S.-India business conference at which several American CEOs plan to announce major deals with India, Washington South Asia experts familiar with the preparations said. Chief among those deals: a $5.4 billion Boeing sale of C-17 transport aircraft to the Indian government as well as an additional sale of commercial aircraft to an Indian domestic airliner. General Electric's CEO is also expected to announce a deal to sell power turbines to the Indian energy company Reliance.

"It will be one of the largest trade missions ever assembled," said a former senior U.S. official who works on Indian issues.

Obama is expected to almost exclusively accentuate the positive in the U.S.-India economic relationship, however, and is not expected to dwell on the touchy issue of the outsourcing of U.S. jobs to the region.

"What they [the Obama team] are really plugging is jobs and exports," said the former U.S. official. "There will be no emphasis [by the White House] at all on the outsourcing of American jobs."

In another sign of the strong economic focus of the trip, Obama will be accompanied in India by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, as well as by USAID Chief Rajiv Shah. (He will not be joined by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or Defense Secretary Robert Gates.)

After Mumbai, Obama will go to Delhi, where he will give a rare address to the Indian Parliament before heading to Indonesia and the G-20 meeting in Seoul, South Korea.

"I don't have any doubt that President Obama is going to wow the Indian masses," former Bush-era U.S. Ambassador to India Robert Blackwill told journalists on a call organized by the Council on Foreign Relations on Wednesday. "He is in Indian eyes an extraordinary example of the diversity and pluralism of American democracy, being the first African-American president. At the most basic level, the Indian people are going to find him extremely attractive and charismatic and so forth."

Blackwill predicted that Obama could wow Indian public and national security elite audiences by saying in his speech to the Parliament that the United States supports India's long-sought aspiration to become a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council in the context of a reformed Security Council. (Currently, the U.S. and China are the only two U.N. Security Council permanent members that have expressed opposition to India's membership, Blackwill said.)

On strategic matters, India remains extremely concerned about a possibly chaotic U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan beginning in July 2011, Blackwill said. India also thinks the U.S. is not putting enough pressure on India to counter cross-border terrorism such as the Mumbai terrorist attacks in November 2008. Obama will stay in Mumbai at the historic Taj Mahal hotel, one of the two Mumbai hotels that were besieged by terrorists, renting out the entire hotel for security reasons. That has led to criticism by some right-leaning commentators, who have said Obama's trip will cost taxpayers $20 million a day. The White House said Thursday that that number is wildly exaggerated, and former senior State Department official Wendy Sherman told NPR Thursday that the entire Obama Asia trip will cost around $50 million.

India is also looking for Obama to delist all Indian companies and entities save for two that the United States has made ineligible for U.S. technology transfers since India's 1998 nuclear weapons test.

"There won't be a single earth-shattering moment" on the trip, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia Evan Feigenbaum told POLITICO. "But there are plenty of ideas on the table. I also think what the president says, for instance in Mumbai, will be important and send powerful messages about shared U.S.-Indian concerns about terrorism."

But Feigenbaum cautioned that it would be a mistake for the Obama administration to think about the growing U.S.-India alliance so "transactionally," as he put it -- the U.S. gives something in order to get something from India.

"A stronger India is good for U.S. interests, so the various things that are on the table for this visit -- from cooperation in Afghanistan to export control reform to defense cooperation via C-17 sales to coordination in third countries, such as in Africa -- reflects that underlying strength," he said.

post-gazette.com is a member of the Politico Network
First published on November 5, 2010 at 12:00 am


http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10309/1100832-473.stm#ixzz14Q1MpxN8 
Users browsing this topic