wheelrite
15 years ago

Seriously, dude.......How are you any different? Everybody gets so wrapped in hating each other. How is your desire for the deaths of the right wingers any different from the Old School moron or any of the other hate mongers?

JadeRose wrote:



Well said Martha,,
dsmokers
15 years ago
I don't differentiate or label anyone as "liberal," "right wing" or whatever. I'm pretty easy. If you follow the Govt, the TV, or the general sleepwalking public, and try to group the rest of us humans as such, then yes, I have no room for you in my life. Just the way I am. I don't "hate" anyone by the way. Death and dying are not the end according to my religion. Sleepwalking is.
ZRX1200
15 years ago
Anyone catch Moochell's comment?
"we have to take the decision away from the parents".

Context was what they eat.....


They tell us what to buy, what to think, what our kids are allowed to learn and eat. How much of "their" money we get to keep...

Good times.
dsmokers
15 years ago
If you're one of the parents that are feeding your kids sh*t, then yes, the decision should be taken away from you.
jpotts
15 years ago

So some of you guys are actually AGAINST making sure a kid gets at least one decent meal a day? Should we go back to the days of your Savior Reagan and call catsup a vegetable?

JadeRose wrote:



Funny you should mention that.

My kids were watching some kids news thing on Niceloden, with Linda Ellerbee as host. One of the kids they spotlighted was getting free school lunches because his mother was on public assistence. His mother was a diabetic and, for some unexplain reason, was disabled to the point where she couldn't work. As the report went, they noted that the kid sometime had to go hungry because he'd only get two meals a day on average, and those came from the school lunch program (or whatever they're calling it now).

The only problem with that statement was that the kid was some 20 lbs overweight.

Then there was a cashier I saw at a local Kroger who was advising a foreigner about what foods were and were not accepted by the WIC program (I think that was the one). I'll tell you this: it was pretty clear that she wasn't starving to death. In fact, it'd take about 50 years before she reached that point.

Childhood obesity is a problem. It is most likely spawned by these food giveaway programs instituted by the federal government.

dsmokers
15 years ago
I would venture to say it's more because of WHAT they are eating, not how much. You are entirely wrong in your statements above Jpotts. It's the food we eat that makes us fat, not how much of it. This is WHY some parents need to have their food choosing priveleges taken away.
DadZilla3
15 years ago
Socialists are incapable of admitting that any of their wealth redistribution schemes are failures. They only conclude that not enough money was thrown at the problem, usually due to reluctance on the part of the 'greedy rich' to share their wealth.
dsmokers
15 years ago
yuk yuk yuk!!!
HockeyDad
15 years ago
Another "feel good" idea turned into government control and takeover of parenting rights.

In general, Americans are becoming more and more useless each day. Bring on the Matrix.
TMCTLT
15 years ago

Ah the good ole days, when everything was perfect. By golly, things were just PERFECT back then. Of course, the average life span was much shorter, and the number one killer of men was industrial accidents (getting killed on the job is SO chinese!). Keep moving backwards, that's what I always say!

dsmokers wrote:




I will take those days over listening to Nanny Ass bitches like you and your politically correct BS.
And please don't go away mad ............................Just go AWAY!!!!!!!!
TMCTLT
15 years ago

Funny you should mention that.

My kids were watching some kids news thing on Niceloden, with Linda Ellerbee as host. One of the kids they spotlighted was getting free school lunches because his mother was on public assistence. His mother was a diabetic and, for some unexplain reason, was disabled to the point where she couldn't work. As the report went, they noted that the kid sometime had to go hungry because he'd only get two meals a day on average, and those came from the school lunch program (or whatever they're calling it now).

The only problem with that statement was that the kid was some 20 lbs overweight.

Then there was a cashier I saw at a local Kroger who was advising a foreigner about what foods were and were not accepted by the WIC program (I think that was the one). I'll tell you this: it was pretty clear that she wasn't starving to death. In fact, it'd take about 50 years before she reached that point.

Childhood obesity is a problem. It is most likely spawned by these food giveaway programs instituted by the federal government.

jpotts wrote:







You cannot be serious!!!! They're are so many kids who come from money, never ate a " Fed lunch" in their lives and yet their obese. This is no different than any other problem, for the most part it falls to what the parents allow..............
TMCTLT
15 years ago

I would venture to say it's more because of WHAT they are eating, not how much. You are entirely wrong in your statements above Jpotts. It's the food we eat that makes us fat, not how much of it. This is WHY some parents need to have their food choosing priveleges taken away.

dsmokers wrote:






I would venture to say " It's Both" a combination of unhealthy choices and over sized portions!!!!!

AND A LACK OF EXCERSIZE
ZRX1200
15 years ago
^ not doc martens with white and red laces?

So DS, the only bigger insult than your genitals is Mexican genitals? And here I thought people joked about you being a racist. That isn't progress or evolution either........
HockeyDad
15 years ago
Mexican ****** outrage.
DrafterX
15 years ago
Mexicans have big fat ones..?? 😕
tailgater
15 years ago

I would venture to say it's more because of WHAT they are eating, not how much. You are entirely wrong in your statements above Jpotts. It's the food we eat that makes us fat, not how much of it. This is WHY some parents need to have their food choosing priveleges taken away.

dsmokers wrote:




This post is a shining example of what is wrong with the liberal mindset.
dsmokers makes a decent point, but then follows it up with the crux of the problem here:
He wants to legislate ALL parents because of the sins of SOME.

Mrs O herself stated very clearly that she wants government to take away a parents choice.
That means EVEN IF THE PARENT IS A GOOD PARENT, she wants our federal government to dictate what their kids can eat.


And the liberals wonder why so many Americans are moving towards the conservative side.
It's not because the GOP is doing it right. It's simply that they're not nearly as misguided as their liberal counterparts.


When the first lady says "We Can't Just Leave it Up to Parents." it is easy to see why reasonable people fear a nanny state.
And yes, that is her exact quote.
If it doesn't scare you, then you either want a bigger, more controlling government or you are too oblivious to care.

daveincincy
15 years ago
OldSchool
15 years ago

Hey oldschool, do you need to inject racial hatred into every thread? Your ignorance shows when you use pet names for Muslims. It shows your lack of education, intellect, ability to reason cognatively without prejudice, and basically the lack of evolution that you and your bloodline have expressed. Die off already, okay?

dsmokers wrote:




So you are admitting he is muslim?
borndead1
15 years ago

This is WHY some parents need to have their food choosing priveleges taken away.

dsmokers wrote:



So....totalitarian government inserting itself into people's refrigerators is the answer to childhood obesity?
tailgater
15 years ago

So....totalitarian government inserting itself into people's refrigerators is the answer to childhood obesity?

borndead1 wrote:




Seems odd, doesn't it?
A guy (dsmokers) who suposedly smokes cigars is wanting (begging) government to control everything.

A slippery slope my friends.
Users browsing this topic