RICKAMAVEN
15 years ago
why does a civilian need a hand gun that holds over 30 bullets?
Nicar
15 years ago
To battle against the forces of evil.......


Because criminals and undesirables get guns that hold more than 30 bullets.......



Why ask why? Try Bud Dry!



](*,) 😣 😣 😣 😣 😣 😣
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago
ZOMBIES!!!

Don't get all stingy with the bullets!:-"
Kawak
15 years ago

why does a civilian need a hand gun that holds over 30 bullets?

RICKAMAVEN wrote:



Because liberal nut bags like him always want more then they need. It's their right!
HockeyDad
15 years ago
There are hand guns that hold more than 30 bullets?
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago

There are hand guns that hold more than 30 bullets?

HockeyDad wrote:




You ever watch a John Wayne movie? He NEVER reloaded!!!
DrafterX
15 years ago

why does a civilian need a hand gun that holds over 30 bullets?

RICKAMAVEN wrote:






why shouldn't a civilian have a hand gun that holds ove 30 bullets..?? 😕
Nicar
15 years ago
Why would someone want a double barrel shotgun as opposed to a single barrel?

Obviously, the more the better..... now what about triple barrel shotgun? That would be righteous!!!
apachelm
15 years ago

why does a civilian need a hand gun that holds over 30 bullets?

RICKAMAVEN wrote:



One of the reasons the Founding Fathers wanted the "civilians" to have the right of gun ownership was to have the ability to overthrow the Gov't should they find the need to. Now if the Gov't can control the # and types and such then there goes that ability.
HockeyDad
15 years ago
"New York Rep. Peter King, chairman of House Homeland Security Committee, will introduce a bill to ban carrying a gun within 1,000 feet of a member of Congress and federal judges. The measure will also apply to carrying weapons near the president or vice president.

King announced the measure at a press conference today with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who heads a gun control group, Mayors Against Illegal Guns and who is backing the bill. King's move may indicate there may be gaining momentum for some sort of gun-control measures in the wake of the Tucson shooting.

King's spokesman was unable to immediately say whether the congressman, who has been generally supportive of gun control measures, would back a separate bill being pushed by New York Democrat Rep. Carolyn McCarthy and New Jersey Democrat Sen. Frank Lautenberg to ban the kind of high capacity magazines that alleged Tucson shooter, Jared Lee Loughner, used during Saturday's attack."





Soon only the shooter with have a gun within 1000 feet of a politician! (I'm speculating that the shooter will break this proposed law)




daveincincy
15 years ago

You ever watch a John Wayne movie? He NEVER reloaded!!!

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Yet another Rickatorical question....



but if you're gonna shoot like a member of the A-Team, you're gonna need a LOT of bullets.
DrafterX
15 years ago

"New York Rep. Peter King, chairman of House Homeland Security Committee, will introduce a bill to ban carrying a gun within 1,000 feet of a member of Congress and federal judges. The measure will also apply to carrying weapons near the president or vice president.

King announced the measure at a press conference today with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who heads a gun control group, Mayors Against Illegal Guns and who is backing the bill. King's move may indicate there may be gaining momentum for some sort of gun-control measures in the wake of the Tucson shooting.

King's spokesman was unable to immediately say whether the congressman, who has been generally supportive of gun control measures, would back a separate bill being pushed by New York Democrat Rep. Carolyn McCarthy and New Jersey Democrat Sen. Frank Lautenberg to ban the kind of high capacity magazines that alleged Tucson shooter, Jared Lee Loughner, used during Saturday's attack."





Soon only the shooter with have a gun within 1000 feet of a politician! (I'm speculating that the shooter will break this proposed law)




HockeyDad wrote:





😨 Everyone needs to send the NRA a couple thousands dollars each ASAP!!!!!
Nicar
15 years ago

Yet another Rickatorical question....



but if you're gonna shoot like a member of the A-Team, you're gonna need a LOT of bullets.

daveincincy wrote:




Does that mean stuff will blow up while shooting, if yo're shooting like a member of the A-Team?

I say... awesome!!!!





And I love the reactorial (if that's a word) legislation that's being proposed that HD mentioned.


Baby falls off highchair.... lets ban highchairs.. they are unsafe......



Dog gets ran over by a car in the street...... no more driving on streets.. less you hit a dog.....






Now... were is my 45 clip of .38s for my revolver!!!!








(incase anyone didn't notice... there's a slim bit of sarcasm in this post)
daveincincy
15 years ago

😨 Everyone needs to send the NRA a couple thousands dollars each ASAP!!!!!

DrafterX wrote:



Yet another law that honest citizens will [have to] abide by.

Is it California that is, or soon will, limit the amount of ammo a person can purchase? If so...refer to sentence above.
HockeyDad
15 years ago
why does a civilian need a car? We could save far more lives by banning cars than by banning guns.
daveincincy
15 years ago

Does that mean stuff will blow up while shooting, if yo're shooting like a member of the A-Team?

I say... awesome!!!!

And I love the reactorial (if that's a word) legislation that's being proposed that HD mentioned.

Baby falls off highchair.... lets ban highchairs.. they are unsafe......

Dog gets ran over by a car in the street...... no more driving on streets.. less you hit a dog.....

Now... were is my 45 clip of .38s for my revolver!!!!

(incase anyone didn't notice... there's a slim bit of sarcasm in this post)

Nicar wrote:




Cars will be flipping all over the place. Fortunately, everyone will walk away with only minor cuts and bruises and the bad guys will always serve their time.

Btw, they are already banning cribs where the side rail comes down. Something about a dozen kids or so getting trapped/suffocated in the last few years.
daveincincy
15 years ago
Why did Rick **ping** MAC on this? 🤔
DrafterX
15 years ago

Why did Rick **ping** MAC on this? 🤔

daveincincy wrote:





Ram hasn't been around much lately... 😟
HockeyDad
15 years ago
Bats don't have 30 round clips.
DrafterX
15 years ago

Bats don't have 30 round clips.

HockeyDad wrote:





:-k true.... but you can hit 30 people with one bat....
Users browsing this topic