Hey Drathaar.
I will agree, that the superbowl refs sucked. I did not want to stray from this thread, for that topic, I just wanted you to know when I classed you with the black helicopter crowd, that thought the game was fixed. You latched on to that belief, and as far as I can tell, heve never conceeded.
But.
I vote for fiscal coservatives, what the republicans used to stand for. Not the NeoNazi tell everyone how to behave socially conservative, class warfare bitches, that the party has become.
I guess we will have to agree to disagree. Just don't call me Adroomie again, or even allude that we are the same person. LOL
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)

Why don't you post the list of your "suspects" for all of us to see and read Drathaar?

Do you remember up above where I posted that McCarthy once said in a floor speech that he would produce "evidence" but when another Senator walked down and held his hand out, he had no evidence?

You are accusing me of being 5 or 6 different people. I think you've read one too many books on McCarthy.

By the way...you never mentioned why you left the military. Was it Chapter 8? Just curious.

You mentioned above that the "signs are all there." You're right.....according to the DSM-IV, the signs are all there:

PPD (paranoid personality disorder)

A pervasive distrust and suspiciousness of others such that their motives are interpreted as malevolent, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by four (or more) of the following:

1. suspects, without sufficient basis, that others are exploiting, harming, or deceiving him or her
is preoccupied with unjustified doubts about the loyalty or trustworthiness of friends or associates

2. is reluctant to confide in others because of unwarranted fear that the information will be used maliciously against him or her

3. reads hidden demeaning or threatening meanings into benign remarks or events

4. persistently bears grudges, i.e., is unforgiving of insults, injuries, or slights

5. perceives attacks on his or her character or reputation that are not apparent to others and is quick to react angrily or to counterattack

LOL @ Adroomie.
Right out of one of those Left Wing textbooks. LOL
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
P.S. Don't you know that all social scientists, are liberals???

(^_^)

Haha! I knew doomi would fall for that one! He thought he had 11 hours to talk smack. I told a white lie, the thread is too long to read on the cell phone....while I'm at work. I'm sure the tax payers are happy to hear I don't use their dime to play on the Internet. I bet your share holders would like to feel the same doomi.

If you want the answer to the McCarthy question, go to the proper thread. I answered last night. It's called GOOD NIGHT, GOOD LUCK & it's on the misc forum. You've been ignoring it ever since. But I'm used to it.

So instead of trying to get information I'm not going to give, why don't you just give cbid the permission? The longer you stall, the more guilty you look. I'm not going to tell you what the signs are because that will force you to change them.

You know vic is one the ones I suspect are you. There are many more. And to tell you the truth, I'm not the first to notice. I was emailed by someone who had been discussing it with others. No, I won't tell you who.

So, if you really want to put this to rest give cbid the permission. I did it, you can too. Are ya yellar?

And HB, I never said you were doomi. You must have me confused with someone else.

"Its beyond coincedence doomi. I can name 4 or 5 right of the top of my head, all the signs are there."


Drathaar,

Name the suspected user names that you believe are all Adroomi. Don't let them hide in the shadows and continue subverting the forum. Out them now.

Droomi can't give you permission to peruse CigarBid's data with a list of suspects because you might be wrong with your list and then CigarBid is violating privacy laws.

Name the names.

Homes, could you explain how Bush is a facist to an ignorany yankee please? If you want, e mail me.

Asking in earnest. BTW I see him as a liberal too. I like it when we agree.

Sorry HB, not gonna happen. I'm not giving him any chance of correcting his mistakes. No names in public.

If doomi would give his permission, no privacy would be violated. Cbid owns the site and can look at anyone they choose. They can also out anyone they choose, they don't need permission. But I'm guessing they would ask for it. Trust me, I'm a message board veteran and have been through this before. I've seen many people busted with an alias, or multiples. I've seen them use pictures and get busted. The message board owner can give the info without permission. It's just nice to ask.

So doomi gives his permission and I send the list to cbid. They check the names and tell us all if doomi is alone or not. Simple.

But you have to be wondering why he's stalling. If he were innocent he would jump at the chance.

Oh, your quote doesn't have me calling you doomi. The only one I've outright named is victor.

Drathaar,
In your post #165 just above I can't stop thinking of you wearing a raincoat and dark glasses while speaking that in the voice of Daffy Duck.

Rugrunner
JonR
HockeyDad
MACS
Tey
Mraven
JackConrad
Rickamaven
Allbidness
Thom
Pablo

Vee have vays of making you talk.........

Can you guess which ones are me Drathaar?

Drathaar,

You opened this can of worms and have made an accusation. CigarBid has a privacy policy and there are laws covering these things. Instead of potentially getting them in trouble, just name the names.

You say four or five are Adroomi. Name them. Are you afraid that you are incorrect and will offend someone?

Drath,
Your belief that I am Adroomi is getting really boring. If you looked in past posts, I've actually traded with a member of this board (at the very beginning, prior to starting to post on political messages).

We can put this crap to bed once and for all. I'll send you my physical address, and you send me a package of cigars. I'll then tell you how many cubans are in the package. That will validate my physical address. You can even reverse lookup that to coincide with my name

Drathaar doesn't have Cuban cigars.

With what he does for a living he DEFINATELY BETTER NOT, and not to mention if he did, he would be a communist supporter. Gee, a commie sympathizer in America working for the Feds. McCarthy would've LOVED this one.

Victor....I'd be really careful who you give your address to on this board.

Okay, on to your long post.

Ohio State: Well, they had a librarian who was conservative. There must be some representation there. I'm not going to justify the activities of the professors, but I notice that no one has identified what the "liberal" readings were.

Western Michigan: Someone is there on campus protesting abortions. This is another reaction to an activity going on on campus. If the students are anti-abortion, they are in no way harmed by the professor. they simply don't go out and tear down the posters.

Flynn is stating that conservatives are outnumbered 10 to 1, but again THIS IS NOT SUBSTANTIATED. Since I have another study (posted earlier) which states how it got the information, I'm inclined to believe it. Is Flynn guessing? Is he basing this off of voter registration? What about unregistered professors? For the accusations made by Horowitz, he chose only specific departments, only chose voter registrations and he ignored all other professors.

Still, why would I believe that schools are unfair? I didn't even vote until I had left graduate schools. MY political choices had nothing to do with my education (let me rephrase that, they have everything to do with my education, nothing to do with specific educators). Actually, I didn't vote until I worked for the campaign of a mayor in Madison (the most conservative on the ballot)

Victor,
What Drathaar forgot to mention in his story about the librarian is this:

1. The three professors that filed the "sexual harrassment" charges against the librarian are openly gay men.

2. The book that the librarian suggested as required reading for incoming freshman was Kupelian's "The Marketing of Evil" and is pretty downright "anti" gay. In fact, "hate" comes to mind when you read that book.

3. The "Christian" librarian, Scott Savage, has made reference in the past to "****gots," "queers," and "fudgepackers" ruining our country, and has made jeering comments to the professors on the campus.

The three professors filed a sexual harrassment lawsuit against the librarian, not only in regards to the books, but also in regards to his actions, and like most corporations, businesses, and even the US Military, the school has opened an investigation, since sexual harrassment is a serious issue.

No results have been posted yet.

Hey Rugrunner.
I have bekieved GWB to be a fascist from before the first election. I lost faith, in the entire family during seniors term. When I saw Chaney, who was part of seniors administration, as VP candidate??? I smelled a rat. Don't forget senior was head of the CIA.
I really think that Chaney calls the shots, in this administration. Much like senior pulled the strings in Reagans second term. I really think that Reagan was a good president, until he started losing his sense of reality, going into his second term.
As far as GWB being fascist??? I really believe that down deep, GWB is a nice fellow. Just a little slow on the uptake, and has become a pawn to big buisness. When money (Big Buisness)controls the government, to the detriment of the population at large, I consider it facism.
When there is a president trying to expand the rights of the government, over the rights of the people. I call that facism. I am sorry, that we disagree on this issue, but we will have to agree to disagree, cause I AINT Changin My Mind. And I do understand where you are coming from as well, as you are just as passionate, in your beliefs.
Here is the way I define Fascism

n : a political theory advocating an authoritarian hierarchical government (as opposed to democracy or liberalism)
Other definitions.
often Fascism
A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
Oppressive, dictatorial control.

The Whole Patriot act was a giant step, in the fascist direction.
The way the Neocons question the patriotism, or right to live in the US of desenters, is a first step towards defining the enemy. It is a way to define an enemy, to focus the population on, while the rights of the people are taken, under the guise of protecting them, from the defined enemy. The Nazis used the jews. The current government claims, that if you aren't with us, you are against us. That makes me wonder, AM I THE ENEMY??? Sure I don't like the direction this country is going. Does that make me an enemy??? While I support going after the people behind 9-11, I also would like to play our cards closer to our chest. Regime building is expensive. We had Sadaam all bottled up. He may have had foreign help, but Iran has always been a major threat. You can ask usahog, but I was posting about Iran before we went into Iraq, under the Shrubs leadership. The UAW is more of a threat than Iraq was, after the first gulf war.

Look Bro,
I could write a book on this subject, but I am getting tired, and need sleep. I went waterskiing today, and I have found muscles I had forgotten about all winter. I will really feel this in the morning. LOL
Have a great week.
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)

HockeyDad, you are wrong. Cbid owns the site, they have the say. I looked and couldn't find a privacy policy. And even if they DID have one, they can change it at will. I've dealt with this before with a guy who would put doomi to shame.

He was stalking a friend of mine and finally crossed the line so far that the FBI arrested him. He used many names and hid himself very well. doomi is an amature, a novice really. The website he used to stalk her could, and did, give up all his information publicly. Granted, he was an extreme case. But the point is, they can do it.

doomi isn't going to give permission though. He's going to keep posting like this never happened. He's going to get beat in more debates and he's going to keep getting nasty when getting his butt whooped. And, he'll continue to make more names to back himself up. That's the saddest part of all. Pathetic really.

Hey Drathaar,
Just curious??? What other usernames do you suspect Adroomie to post under???
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)

doomi, re: 175

I forgot nothing googlemeister. I simple quote from the master of Campus bias. None of what you said matters. What it showed is an example of Democrats running the campus. Liberal book ok, Republican books bad. Censorship is censorship. By the way, where's your link? Back it up.

And vic, do you really think I'd send you cigars if there's ANY chance of you being doomi? You got a better chance of seeing God. Tell ya what, when its proven who's doomi and who isn't and if you get cleared I'll gladly send you an apology 5er.

But, burgess lives in Japan and has a US address. Wont work, sorry.

Now back to googlemeister...http://www.cigarbid.com/auction/forum/forum.cfm?action=list&forumID=9&messageDisplay=0000000060625

There's your answer to the McCarthy question. Did you forget so soon? Or are you just in tail-between-the-legs ignore mode again? There's another quiz for you there too.

Give the permission doomi. I dare you.

Sorry HB, I can't clue him in. I've already said that above.