HockeyDad
14 years ago

No one is ever going to repay much, if any at all. Instead, we will keep overspending and then hyper inflate the economy and nominally repay debt with worthless "money". A few years later on down the road, lenders will forget what happened and will start pumping money into the U.S. again. Works like a charm for the rest of the world. Will work for the U.S. too. It is only just a matter of time- many years out...

rfenst wrote:





So you actually believe in free money now followed by hyperinflation destroying the economy and a national bankruptcy.

Do we want to go with that plan and call it good stewardship?
View All Posts by User
rfenst
14 years ago

What question?

I did in post 46.

HockeyDad wrote:



See #8, which wasn't directed towards you.
Now quit f'ing around with the children and get your lazy french azz to work like the rest of us peons!
View All Posts by User
HockeyDad
14 years ago
I answered that one in #11!

I don't feel like going to work. Maybe I will, maybe not. Right now I'm going to have a cigar and head for the hot tub.
View All Posts by User
DrafterX
14 years ago
If only Bush hadn't blown all that surplus on wars and stuff...... 😞
View All Posts by User
jpotts
14 years ago
I say: nay.

All a balanced budget requirement does is to simply offer justification to politicians to raise taxes because of their unseemly spending habits.

It is easy to "balance" a budget with other people's money.

Plus, as in WWII, the US may need to go into debt to pay for...well...it's very existence.

It would probably be much easier and wiser to round up all of the socialists, Marxists, Keynseans, and hardcore modern liberals and toss them into the middle of the Pacific.

Problem solved.
View All Posts by User
jpotts
14 years ago

ZRX1200
the way out of the financial crisis and the no jobs is for the government to stimulate the economy
until we have increased GDP, tax the rich who have stolen their money from the rest of us, special deductions for corporate jets my asss, not until every child goes to bed with a warm full belly.

RICKAMAVEN wrote:



Many of the kids who are dangerously obese are on any number of government-funded nutrition programs.

I'll never forget the Nickelodian special I watched with my sons where they profiled some kid whose mom was a diabetic, on disability, and was receving free school lunches, foodstamps, and the like.

They pointed out that sometimes he only got two meals a day, and he had to go "hungry."

The only problem with this little view into desperate lives of poor people in this county is that the kid was something like 40 lbs overweight.



Your point being, Rick?
View All Posts by User
jpotts
14 years ago
Oh yeah, that special tax-break that people got for private jets? Well, that was rammed-through by Democrats in 2009, I believe, when they had total control of the House, Senate, and the White House.

So...um...are you really sure you want to pick that scab there Rick?
View All Posts by User
rfenst
14 years ago

I answered that one in #11!

I don't feel like going to work. Maybe I will, maybe not. Right now I'm going to have a cigar and head for the hot tub.

HockeyDad wrote:




Cigar: Yes!
Hot Tub: Too f'n hot!
View All Posts by User
rfenst
14 years ago

So you actually believe in free money now followed by hyperinflation destroying the economy and a national bankruptcy.

Do we want to go with that plan and call it good stewardship?

HockeyDad wrote:




No, I don't believe in free money now. And, this is not a plan. If it were, I would not consider it good stewardship. It is just what I inevitably believe will occur in the future.
View All Posts by User
HockeyDad
14 years ago
I can work with that.

I do not believe Americans or American politicians have what it takes to make hard choices to establish fiscal responsibility. What is going on right now is just an act for the cameras. The IMF and the bond credit rating agencies are hinting at that as well. The EU, China, and Japan are also now chiming in on the debate.

Ultimately we will have to have forced austerity from outside (probably foreign) creditors to force us to live within our means. I do think when we reach that point national bankruptcy and a breakup of the Union will need to be up for discussion.
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

I can work with that.

I do not believe Americans or American politicians have what it takes to make hard choices to establish fiscal responsibility. What is going on right now is just an act for the cameras. The IMF and the bond credit rating agencies are hinting at that as well. The EU, China, and Japan are also now chiming in on the debate.

Ultimately we will have to have forced austerity from outside (probably foreign) creditors to force us to live within our means. I do think when we reach that point national bankruptcy and a breakup of the Union will need to be up for discussion.

HockeyDad wrote:




Kabuki Theater!
[frypan]
View All Posts by User
pgje51
14 years ago
Hope and spare change.
View All Posts by User
ZRX1200
14 years ago
RICKMAVEN, BONER JUST CALLEDTHE KENYAN KING OUT AND CALLED HIM A WHINNEY LITTLE BÏTCH......

View All Posts by User
Mathen
14 years ago
I'm not normally pedantic about spelling. Honest. The word, however, is 'secede', not "succeed".

Great public education system we've got.
View All Posts by User
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

RICKMAVEN, BONER JUST CALLEDTHE KENYAN KING OUT AND CALLED HIM A WHINNEY LITTLE BÏTCH......

ZRX1200 wrote:



Sexy
View All Posts by User
robertknyc
14 years ago

So you actually believe in free money now followed by hyperinflation destroying the economy and a national bankruptcy.

Do we want to go with that plan and call it good stewardship?

HockeyDad wrote:



Since when did the HockeyDad start using RICKAMAVEN'S font?
View All Posts by User
RICKAMAVEN
14 years ago
rfenst #8

ARTICLE 14 WOULD ALLOW HIM TO, BUT THE
SUPREME COURT WOULD RULE AGAINST OBAMA.

WE NEED TO IMPEACH CLARENCE THOMAS. PUT IN A
LIBERAL AND CHANGE THE COURT, SCALIA WILL
RETIRE ONE MORE LIBERAL AND THE COUNTRY WILL
BE SAVED


I WONDER IF ANY ONE WILL DISAGREE WITH ME
View All Posts by User
RICKAMAVEN
14 years ago
robertknyc

PERHAPS HE HAS DEVELOPED OBLIQUE DOUBLE VISION AS I HAVE.
I CAN SEE MUCH BETTER WITH A LARGER FONT.

THE RED IS BECAUSE I HAVE HAD SEVERAL RED CARS.
View All Posts by User
RICKAMAVEN
14 years ago
robertknyc

SPEAKING OF BAD VISION, TRY DRIVING THE FREEWAY IN THE DIAMOND
LANE WITH THE CRUISE CONTROL @ 75.

ALSO I CAN'T WATCH 3D MOVIES
,
I HAVE NO DEPTH PERCEPTION.

WHEN THE CAR IN FRONT OF ME GETS VERY LARGE,
I HIT THE BRAKE AND SHUT OFF THE CRUISE CONTROL
View All Posts by User
HockeyDad
14 years ago

rfenst #8

ARTICLE 14 WOULD ALLOW HIM TO, BUT THE
SUPREME COURT WOULD RULE AGAINST OBAMA.

WE NEED TO IMPEACH CLARENCE THOMAS. PUT IN A
LIBERAL AND CHANGE THE COURT, SCALIA WILL
RETIRE ONE MORE LIBERAL AND THE COUNTRY WILL
BE SAVED


I WONDER IF ANY ONE WILL DISAGREE WITH ME

RICKAMAVEN wrote:




MORE DEBT WILL SAVE US! WE NEED TO RIG THE SUPREME COURT TO ALLOW IT.
View All Posts by User
Users browsing this topic
Mobile! Terms | Privacy | Contact Us | Help | © 1998-2026, CigarBid.com