Also you don't work therefore this doesn't concern you.

You don't think the Dems are trying to make political hay? They've been bleeding this "brinkmanship" by the Rs for the last year.

What's the count up to?


960 something days without a budget?

2 years with complete control and no D action?

ZRX1200 wrote:

The US House Republicans are being douchebags and trying to ruin the US Senate's vacation.

If you think back a few months, you'll recall that I warned that this 2% tax hike was coming so everybody had better have their finances in order.

(The next tax hit will be the expiration of the entire Bush tax cuts.)

They all need to just get it over with and let this tax cut expire, let the doc fix expire, and not extend unemployment another year. The government can't afford any of it.

HockeyDad wrote:

Indefensible ? So we should just let the Libs run roughshod even more with our money? Thats working real well right now.

dubleuhb wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcWVL4B-4pI&feature=youtube_gdata_player

ZRX1200 wrote:

Sell a snickerdoodle and buy a clue.

No I consider it deflection.

ZRX1200 wrote:

How is he relevant to current events? How is he currently affecting society?

If your deflecting attention because the magic knee grow is deficient in his abilities then this is rhetorical question.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Robert, if he didn't deflect questions he refuses to answer id completely agree with you.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Weak deflection and typical response from you.
POOPIE!

ZRX1200 wrote:

The Bush cuts are aimed at the top earners so the Republicans will fight for that saying the opposite stuff they are saying now. These are for working people so they play games and demand they are 'paid' for, something that goes against everything they stand for tax policy wise.

FuzzNJ wrote:

It's funny stuff, especially when people who work and would be actually effected by this tax cut support the R's here. Maybe not funny, sad.

FuzzNJ wrote:

What? It's a tax cut, less money to the government, and the Republicans are against it. Holy crap. Pay attention. Wow.

FuzzNJ wrote:

The actual numbers on the Bush tax cuts (not the rhetoric) showed that they had a wide effect on the non-rich through the lower tax bracket adjustments. That is why Obama wants to keep those and cherrypick off the upper end. When the inevitable impasse happens, all those tax cuts will simply expire.

HockeyDad wrote: