Of course It's his own choice, a silly, stupid, un-american one, but his choice nonetheless.

FuzzNJ wrote:

Of course It's his own choice, a silly, stupid, un-american one, but his choice nonetheless.

FuzzNJ wrote:

I think it's rather petty, but in no way is it un-american.

Thomas posted on Facebook that he is not against the current POTUS, but rather is disenchanted with the Federal Government in general, naming both the Republicans and the Democrats as being at fault.

tailgater wrote:

Of course It's his own choice, a silly, stupid, un-american one, but his choice nonetheless.

FuzzNJ wrote:

I would surely go..

I have always wanted to meet Chewbaca,,,

wheelrite wrote:

I remember an athlete refused to visit 43.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Un-Amercan?

Free association is the definition of American. Of course that's lost on people like you.



This is a modern thing, athletes haven't been visiting presidents for ever. And he's not the first to decline the offer. I remember an athlete refused to visit 43.

ZRX1200 wrote:

I think it's rather petty, but in no way is it un-american.

Thomas posted on Facebook that he is not against the current POTUS, but rather is disenchanted with the Federal Government in general, naming both the Republicans and the Democrats as being at fault.

tailgater wrote:

also,

I have never been invited to an African American's home to eat .Another reason I'd go...

wheelrite wrote:

Yeah, he should have been shackled and dragged in there and forced to be somewhere he didn't want to be, now that is liberty at it's best.
It meant nothing, it was a choice he made. I know you would jump at the chance but some have principles and stand by them.

dubleuhb wrote: