drywalldog
13 years ago
That is basicly the policy I was offered for my 1800.00 per month.
wheelrite
13 years ago

That is basicly the policy I was offered for my 1800.00 per month.

drywalldog wrote:



Hmm,,,
I'd double check that.

Btw,
are you self employed ?

if so ..
http://www.nase.org/BenefitsHome.aspx 

dpnewell
13 years ago

Health insurance companies should be not for profits, that would cure a lot of the ills in the system.

drywalldog wrote:



Dry wall companies should not be for profit, and all workers should get minimum wage. That would help cure the ills in the housing market. In fact it should be this way with all construction. Everyone should have the right to live in a spanking new home, not just those rich bastids who can afford them.
wheelrite
13 years ago

Dry wall companies should not be for profit, and all workers should get minimum wage. That would help cure the ills in the housing market. In fact it should be this way with all construction. Everyone should have the right to live in a spanking new home, not just those rich bastids who can afford them.

dpnewell wrote:



Pedro does drywall cheaper than whitey,,,

so I use Pedro.

Hence , I have more money to piss away...

It's the American way
sd72
13 years ago
You could vote Obama because hes not anti tobacco/ anti gun/ pro Mormon agenda. Living off interest from "good investments" in offshore accounts, so he only pays taxes on what he draws off it.

Or not.
wheelrite
13 years ago

You could vote Obama because hes not anti tobacco/ anti gun/ pro Mormon agenda. Living off interest from "good investments" in offshore accounts, so he only pays taxes on what he draws off it.

Or not.

sd72 wrote:



Refering to Romney ,eh ?

Not what he "Draws off it...

Capitol Gains,,,

and it's all legal and above board

and what is the Pro Mormon agenda ?


idiot,,,
victor809
13 years ago



and what is the Pro Mormon agenda ?


idiot,,,

wheelrite wrote:



Hang on... there can be a "gay agenda" but someone's an idiot for suggesting a "pro mormon agenda"?
nitro6526
13 years ago
MORMON OUTRAGE!!! all they wanna do is wear colored glasses and talk to you about jesus.
drywalldog
13 years ago
Dpnewell, most drywall companies would qualify as Nfp for the last 5 years, and hourly workers get approx what wages were in 1980, thanks to Pedro. What do you do for a living?
drywalldog
13 years ago
As for the ills in the housing market, you take the five million people out that didnt deserve the American Dream, and you just have to wait for them to drop far enough for the rich to buy them at pennies on the dollar.
drywalldog
13 years ago
People earning Walmart wages wont save the housing or construction businesses.
ZRX1200
13 years ago
Well were too busy in Oregon paying for PERs retirement bennies for gov't workers to worry about peasants who actually make things not involved in gov't contracts.

DWD living wage jobs have been attacked by both sides for different reasons.
dpnewell
13 years ago

Dpnewell, most drywall companies would qualify as Nfp for the last 5 years, and hourly workers get approx what wages were in 1980, thanks to Pedro. What do you do for a living?

drywalldog wrote:



It was a tongue in check reply, sheesh, dude. You libs all the time say that one industry or another shouldn't be allowed to make profit. Oil companies are evil because the make a profit. Banks are evil because they make a profit. Now you're saying that insurance companies should not be allowed to make a profit. Then neither should your industry. You want to be able to dictate who's allowed to make a profit and who's not. Typical liberal selfishness.

Oh, and by the way, I own a small contruction company, so don't cry to me the blues about being NFP and taking low wages. I've lived it far more then you have over the past few years, all thanks to that dickweed you helped to elect.
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago
Judging by this thread and from the media...you vote for the Empty Suit because you want something for free.

Remember when we elected leaders to actually lead?

Now they have to have this entire parade of free candy...pony rides...longer recesses...oh and healthcare now!

Gimmie a break.

A government that gives you everything..can take it ALL away.

SLAVE MENTALITY!
wheelrite
13 years ago

Hang on... there can be a "gay agenda" but someone's an idiot for suggesting a "pro mormon agenda"?

victor809 wrote:



I'm curious to know what the Mormon Agenda is..
HockeyDad
13 years ago

So the righties answer is that we should make due with crap, or less insurance. At the same time we will be paying twice what the average mortgage is per month? At least Obama tried to tackle this problem, which is more than anyone else has, or will do.

drywalldog wrote:




You actually thought healthcare costs would go down with Obamacare?! I suppose unicorns will be picking up the cost of the 20% that were uninsured!
HockeyDad
13 years ago

As for the ills in the housing market, you take the five million people out that didnt deserve the American Dream, and you just have to wait for them to drop far enough for the rich to buy them at pennies on the dollar.

drywalldog wrote:




Everyone deserves the American Dream. You should help pay for it for them.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Judging by this thread and from the media...you vote for the Empty Suit because you want something for free.

DrMaddVibe wrote:





That is the general pattern yet in reality those actually under the Cone of Protection turned out to be a small select few. People will continue to vote for the Empty Suit thinking they'll get under the Cone this time around.

It is quite laughable while sitting here inside the Cone looking out!
rfenst
13 years ago
I voted for Obama because the angry, old man with gray hair made a series of major, stupid decisions towards the end of his campaign. Lesser of two evils kind of thing.
rfenst
13 years ago

You could vote Obama because hes not anti tobacco/ anti gun/ pro Mormon agenda. Living off interest from "good investments" in offshore accounts, so he only pays taxes on what he draws off it.

Or not.

sd72 wrote:




I cannot begrudge Romney for taking his money offshore to minimize his tax liability, if what he is doing is perfect legal. So far, no one has pointed out that it isn't...
Users browsing this topic