teedubbya
13 years ago
I remember a day when anyone who didn't vote for bush was a democrat. Yet those that voted for bush didn't do so for partisan reasons.
ZRX1200
13 years ago
I love bush.


41&43 not so much.


DadZilla3
13 years ago

Three wives for every man, you ignorant slut!

rfenst wrote:


Paying for one ex-wife is bad enough. Paying for three ex-wives...even pulling in better than $150k/ year you'd be living in a big cardboard box under the freeway overpass.
pdxstogieman
13 years ago
because I want a supreme court that doesn't rule that "corporations are people".
rfenst
13 years ago

because I want a supreme court that doesn't rule that "corporations are people".

pdxstogieman wrote:



Good for you. Let's undo the 14th Amendment and go back to the 1800s!!!
ZRX1200
13 years ago
I want a supreme court that doesn't make law and it's members recuse when prudence dictates.

Thomas. Kagen that mexican lezbo (whayever her name is).......
rfenst
13 years ago

I want a supreme court that doesn't make law....

ZRX1200 wrote:



What does that really even mean?
teedubbya
13 years ago
I think we should get rid of the supreme court since we know better in here what is constitutional or not. We should lock down current membership in here to prevent outsiders flooding the board and libbing it up (since like fox it is fair and balanced in here). Then all legal matters could be subjected to a poll. The results will be binding.

We should do the prez elections that way to since no one in here is partisan and every one gives deep thought to their positions that are in no way influenced by partisan politics.

Let's get r done!
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
Now I'm waiting for someone to say that they're voting for Obama because of McLame II's, er, I mean Romney's VP choice of Ryan as running mate.
HockeyDad
13 years ago
TW, You're trying too hard again!
bloody spaniard
13 years ago

I think we should get rid of the supreme court since we know better in here what is constitutional or not. We should lock down current membership in here to prevent outsiders flooding the board and libbing it up (since like fox it is fair and balanced in here). Then all legal matters could be subjected to a poll. The results will be binding.
We should do the prez elections that way to since no one in here is partisan and every one gives deep thought to their positions that are in no way influenced by partisan politics.
Let's get r done!

teedubbya wrote:




Hey, I get it especially when you're laying it on thick but it's still good manners to use this for the mentally challenged [sarcasm]
bloody spaniard
13 years ago

TW, You're trying too hard again!

HockeyDad wrote:




That's what she said.[gonzo]
teedubbya
13 years ago
I was serious. Y'all are mean.
teedubbya
13 years ago
#69. There are some that will. Ryan is considered pretty radical by some. His budget certainly is. I'd bet the dems are licking their chops on this one.

Palin was an unknown and for awhile the dems were nervous about it and the rs were excited by the fresh face and rack. Then she spoke.

Ryan is known by the folks that follow politics. It will be interesting how he translates to the masses.
cacman
13 years ago

Judging by this thread and from the media...you vote for the Empty Suit because you want something for free.

Remember when we elected leaders to actually lead?

Now they have to have this entire parade of free candy...pony rides...longer recesses...oh and healthcare now!

Gimmie a break.

A government that gives you everything..can take it ALL away.

SLAVE MENTALITY!

DrMaddVibe wrote:


You forgot Immunity...
pdxstogieman
13 years ago

Good for you. Let's undo the 14th Amendment and go back to the 1800s!!!

rfenst wrote:



The "Citizens United" ruling has nothing to do with the 14th amendment, but it's already enabling us to go in the wayback machine to the gilded age of robber barons and allowing the degree to which money buys political influence metastasize.
pdxstogieman
13 years ago

I think we should get rid of the supreme court since we know better in here what is constitutional or not. We should lock down current membership in here to prevent outsiders flooding the board and libbing it up (since like fox it is fair and balanced in here). Then all legal matters could be subjected to a poll. The results will be binding.

We should do the prez elections that way to since no one in here is partisan and every one gives deep thought to their positions that are in no way influenced by partisan politics.

Let's get r done!

teedubbya wrote:



Too late. I've already pissed in the pool.
drywalldog
13 years ago
TW, they aren't mean, just angry, there is a difference. You see, some one is in their Whitehouse, and he is gonna change the curtains. He not entitled to do that.
cacman
13 years ago
"Try and fathom the hypocrisy of a Government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured, but not everyone must prove they are a citizen".
Just a small part of Obama's agenda and legacy. Vote for him again and it will only get worse!
drywalldog
13 years ago
Whats hard for me to fathom is that American business still uses the illegal aliens?
Users browsing this topic