When was the last time anyone actually held or read a Time magazine?

[whip]

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Well if they start putting sluts on the cover that could improve readership.

HockeyDad wrote:

She is a despicable child of the entitlement generation.
The media used her to paint conservatives as being anti-women even though this subject has zero relevance toward that end. The issue of who pays for female contraception is not about gender equality or a right to control the reproductive capacity, yet that's how most of the liberals perceived it and then perpetuated it.

So, yes. She had an impact on America 2012.
But her nominiation will not be met with indifference or with deserved notoriety.
Rather, she will be praised by the media and the liberal lemmings who failed to comprehend what the term "access" means when dealing with contraception.

tailgater wrote:

Hater’s gonna hate.

Brewha wrote:

That is a standard response when no argument is to be had.

dubleuhb wrote:

take out the descriptive term "despicable" and tell me if there is anything untrue in what I wrote.

tailgater wrote:

This award sort of lost some luster during the Hitler years circa 1938

teedubbya wrote:

Hitler has nothing on this random woman who thought she could get the government to pay for her birth control!!!!!!


I heard she's a slut too!

victor809 wrote:

This award sort of lost some luster during the Hitler years circa 1938

teedubbya wrote:

she is a lightweight.

unlike some in here though I think she is sort of pretty. maybe just because she is dirty and easy.

teedubbya wrote: