So what exactly do you think the " Entitled " First Lady meant when she said " For the first time in her life she was finally proud to be an American " The First Lady of Racism " I friggin guarantee you that based on skin color alone....she was afforded more opportunities than I EVER dreamed of!!!

TMCTLT wrote:

I thought you weren't responding to any of my posts any longer.
Don't you have a manifesto to start drafting or something?

victor809 wrote:

Anyone one of these "hateful" guys here call Moochelle a NUTJOB KU NT?

Much here is bait or jest you see what you choose to

ZRX1200 wrote:

Keep in mind that people don't post solely in one thread based off of what's in it.

I quoted nut job because it was mentioned here the other part was from Rick in multiple other threads.

I actually agree with almost everything you just said Victor, a lot gets lost here because of the medium. Oftentimes here I use absurd things to point out absurd things. In the example of Michelle my absurdity is going off of the ground rules that Ricks set. To me right or wrong is in the eyes of the viewer. You have to allow yourself to be offended and personally I don't mind being offended at some time to change my view of things.

I have mocked her appearanceto also her willingness to control things that parents should. Does she really look like Chewbacca? No. What bothered me about what was posted above was about someone's opinion and beliefs compared to what soneone else has done. Do I agree with Michelle's politics no but I would not wish her to die or go away from the public I just because I disagree with her.

The other day I saw a bumper sticker that had the circle with a line through it and underneath of that was tea party. The idea that other opinions don't have a right to exist to something bothers me.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Interesting...
I don't think anyone has used the word hateful in this thread other than you, not sure why you "quoted" it.

Anyway," nutjob ku nt" is a more appropriate insult in my mind.

When all the insults are about her weight, her looks, her arms, calling her "sasquatch" or "moochelle", it brings up a very questionable double standard.
President's wives are rarely attractive. Given they are usually in their 40s or older, they usually look matronly at best. No one is going to put Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, Hillary Clinton or any of the others in a playboy spread. Yet this first lady has gotten an uncomfortable amount of negative attention surrounding her looks.... when she's arguably at least in the middle of the pack in US history (seriously, look up photos of the US first ladies). She's younger than many, thinner than many, has a better body and more youthful face than many.

Yet all this negative attention on her appearance.

victor809 wrote:

Hitler, skin-heads, the Klan and the like already drafted them for him.

rfenst wrote:

I honestly don't understand why you guys have such an axe to grind for Michelle. I can understand about Hillary but Michelle really hasn't been too bad. Oh well. Carry on.

Buckwheat wrote:

Palin was hated as an unknown simply for being nominated. What and how did she ever effect anyone?

ZRX1200 wrote:

How much is this costing us?

mikey1597 wrote:

This should help.

watchdog.org - "President Obama and daughters Sasha and Malia left Oahu after 15-day holiday vacation in a beachfront luxury home in Kailua, Oahu.

They also left a pretty big bill.

The Obamas’ vacation cost taxpayers more than $4 million for travel, staffing, security, housing, car rentals and transportation of vehicles and a helicopter.

But the expenses continue.

First lady Michelle Obama extended her own vacation, flying to the island of Maui, where she is spending time with family friend Oprah Winfrey. Winfrey’s magazine describes the home as a “perfect 21st-century farmhouse” in a “remote up-country region, where the houses that dot the moss-covered rock hillside face the ocean.”

The president said he sent his wife to Maui as an early birthday present; she turns 50 Jan. 17."

Burner02 wrote:

This is what I was wondering, the cost, not making accusations about her big asss or her baboon like features or the way her and her partner made their millions. I wanted to know how much their entertainment is costing all us poor folks.

mikey1597 wrote:

secret service, entourage, drones, coast guard, war puppy-dogs... the list is long... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

secret service, entourage, drones, coast guard, war puppy-dogs... the list is long... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

Which exist for every first lady, and which need to be deployed any time she's not at her house.
She could spend her birthday in a shack in detroit and that cost would be present.

Is your stance that every first lady past and present should spend their birthday at the white house (and no fancy parties either!) because I'm betting that anyone with time on their hands could find first ladys travelling for their birthday.

Maybe if you jack@sses stopped posting so many things about how angry you are about the first lady, they wouldn't have to spend so much on security....

victor809 wrote: