Seems like these students do understand the constitution, freedom of speech. The world has passed you by and this angers you every time you see it. This is understandable. Your point of view has became obsolete, except within the group that holds the viewpoint. This group was the majority for a very long time. Now they are the minority. Year by year this minority will be smaller and smaller. Are you already a dinosaur, you just don't see it. You miss the obvious, to the majority of Americans your opinion is worthless. But you will go right on attempting to marginalize what the reality in front of you instead of trying to understand it. Our country is supposed to represent all our people, not just part of the people like you.

Speyside wrote:

"Faculty Deans
Each Harvard House is under the leadership of Faculty Deans, living in residence. Among varied duties of the Faculty Deans, the role of academic officer in the residential college system is preeminent. In addition, Faculty Deans are responsible for all House staff, tutorial and Senior Common Room appointments. In short, Faculty Deans set the tone for the House in its activities and in its function as a close-knit community within the context of a larger college and university."

They're overqualified RAs.....

victor809 wrote:

I googled "Harvard Weinstein"

Nothing more. Nothing less.

First two hits required log in.

Sorry to upset you so much.


And nice deflection, not answering any questions because my first post upset you.

Which speaks volumes.

tailgater wrote:

Look no further than the petition.

Despite my admitted bias, I am deadly accurate with my assessment.

Sorry if that's offensive.

No really though.

tailgater wrote:

I went to a reasonably prestigious science and medicine university. My close friend was a history major who literally couldn't understand calculus and never took a single math course. If he had started a "change.org" protest against differential calculus, would you have a fit too?

victor809 wrote:

yeah, I googled harvard weinstein protest. It worked great. I apparently got better information than you did.

Funny how that works.

victor809 wrote:

The point was that I didn't google any the key words you claim I did.
But you knew that, it just doesn't fit your narrative.


You're all over the place Vic.

I say the students protest because of identity politics.
You say it's because they're afraid their RA will be MIA during the nights.
I show you proof that the politics aren't just a part of the reason, they're the MAIN reason.
You cry about me "moving the goalposts".

You have a small bundle of canned responses and it seems you don't even know when to use them.


this is simple:

the students are protesting because of politics.
I find it funny and think they're snowflakes.
You want to defend them but instead of defending their politics you try to attack me and say I'm wrong.
Because the pseudo-dean professor might spend hours away. And he recently defended another (get ready for it)... criminal!
Which is what I thought defense teams often were supposed to do.

They have every right to do this.
I never said, and I never implied that they don't.

I'm not sure why anyone who agrees with their politics would feel compelled to dig out unrelated sidenotes and then jump up and yell "gotcha!"

It's not my fault the students are more interested in identity politics then they are our justice system.

tailgater wrote:

A professor at Harvard is joining Harvey Weinstein's defense team.

Students are protesting.

Is it because:
A. Students at the country's most prestigious law school don't understand.....

snowflake wrote:

Why don't you point out one for me? I'm not sure what I would call your inaccuracies, but certainly not an adult conversation. As usual you address none of my points. How typical, how boring, how tail. Perhaps you could pick another unimportant talking point? You do that quite well.

Speyside wrote:

All I know is a professor at Harvard is joining Harvey Weinstein's defense team and students at the country's most prestigious law school are protesting because they don't understand that you can't define a lawyer by his clients, don't understand the concept of "innocent until proven guilty", don't understand that due process is a right, or they have fully embraced the intolerance endorsed by today's liberal mouthpieces.

!

teedubbya wrote: