Brewha
3 years ago
so... you're one of the guys who tried the bleach then?
DrMaddVibe
3 years ago

so... you're one of the guys who tried the bleach then?

Brewha wrote:



Obviously your mom tried bleach.

That would explain so much about you. Lack of basic reading and comprehension, common sense and following a conversation ability. You need to start another topic about bleach, by all means please do but NOBODY was talking about it here.
MACS
DrMaddVibe
3 years ago
"The Trials Should Have Been Halted": Rate Of 'Serious Adverse Events' Closely Tracks Spike In Post-Vax Disabilities



Over the past 18 months, skeptics of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines and those pointing out high rates of adverse reactions have been subject to ostracism, deplatforming, and flawed 'fact checks' to shut down opinions and analysis which conflicted with official narratives.

Now, the data has begun to speak for itself, thanks to people like former Blackrock portfolio manager Ed Dowd, who has devoted the last several years to deep-dive research and analysis of pandemic-related data (in fact, he's written an excellent book on the topic). Dowd, along with partners Carlos Alegria and Yuri Nunes, launched Phinance Technologies - where, aside from traditional macroeconomic analysis, they have produced comprehensive reports on pandemic-related disabilities and excess deaths using official data.

Their latest analysis reveals that the rate of Serious Adverse Events in the mRNA Covid-19 vaccine clinical trials closely tracks a spike in disabilities reported after the vaccine rollout.

Via Phinance Technologies (emphasis ours),

In part 3 of our US disabilities analysis we observed that the rise in disability rates post 2/2021 correlates closely with the rollout of the vaccination schedule. When looking at changes in disabilities on a wider time frame (since 2008) we observe that the disability rates rose or fell from month to month but tended to be relatively stable over time. However, as shown in part 1, the change in behaviour since early 2021 is clearly an abnormal occurrence with high level of statistical significance. It happens to be highly correlated to the cumulative Covid-19 vaccine rollout, but we cannot state that the correlation is statistically meaningful as it is based on a cumulative plot with obvious autocorrelation.

In this section we provide further evidence that the most likely cause of the rise in disabilities is the Covid-19 vaccines. For that purpose, we model the expected rise in disabilities due to the vaccination rollout in the general population. We do so by using the rates of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) obtained by the safety analysis of the mRNA vaccine (Pfizer and Moderna) clinical trials, performed in the Vaccine journal paper we reviewed here, and our analysis in part five.

We can observe that the rate of rise in disabilities is higher than the computed rate of rise in SAEs of special interest, which could be explained in several different ways, or by a combination of factors.

By the definition of an SAEs of special interest being more extreme than the rate of disabilities reported by the individuals surveyed by the BLS i.e. some disabilities reported by the individuals surveyed by the BLS may be caused by adverse events that are not deemed SAEs of special interest, due to the criteria used to define an SAE being overly restrictive.
The population of the Civilian Labor Force as a whole may be less healthy (and somehow more vulnerable to vaccine-related disabilities) than the vaccine trial populations, either due to the selection criteria for participation in the trial, or ‘self-selection’ bias.
Under-reporting of SAEs of special interest in the trial populations.
Other factors causing excess disabilities in the Civilian Labor Force in a concurrent timeframe to the vaccine rollout.

As Dowd further notes via Twitter;

The rate of estimated SAEs appears to be under-reported relative the recorded rise in disabilities (according to the BLS survey) by about 2.6 times. These results were expected as we had already shown in part 3 of our study the high correlation between the rise in the disability rate since 2/21 with the vaccine rollout. We realise that performing the correlation of cumulative time series is misleading & the R2 should not be taken as an indication of establishing a statistically significant relationship as both time series have autocorrelation."

Bottom line: There were enough safety signals to show that what we are seeing in the BLS data was known during the clinical trials even given their narrow definition of a SAE. The trials should have been halted.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/trials-should-have-been-stopped-rate-serious-adverse-events-closely-tracks-spike-post-vax 


Follow the Science they said, all while lining up to be the gatekeepers of "The Data"...that you're unwashed hands weren't ever going to read. The politicized it and then weaponized it with government agencies we never voted in.

Like we knew all along...the clot shot was worthless in combating Covid. You have to be a complete moron at this point to line up for more "boostahs" of this genetic rubbish. Now is the time for the criminals to pay for what they did.
MACS
3 years ago
Commercials are still airing pushing the boosters. Nothing has changed, and nobody will be held accountable.

That's just the way it is right now.

I mean, c'mon... mountains of evidence against Hunter Biden and his daddy and nothing has been done. There's a list of Epstein's clients and nothing has been done.

Are you expecting anything will ever be done? I'm not.
RayR
3 years ago
I've seen the commercials being stepped up regularly when the TV is on, both by the REGIME and NYS here.
The message is the same...you need to get jabbed and boosted or else, you won't be protected by your old jab without a new booster and will never be happy and content like our smiling actors are in the commercial.
The general public disinterest in complying though has made it a hard sell. The revelations of the uptick in adverse effects haven't helped I suppose.

"The bivalent booster was released in September, but it has seen little uptake. According to the CDC, just around 16% of the US population has received it and the rate is even lower for those under the age of 65."

“Data from the three large health care systems in New York and Israel since September 1 indicate that the low booster uptake for people under 65 has not led to high Covid hospitalization rates for this group,” CNN reported.


Recent Evidence from Three Major Healthcare Systems Suggests Lack of COVID-19 Boosters Does Not Increase Hospitalization (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft Feb. 21, 2023 9:00 am

Contrary to claims made by the Biden regime and the media, the decline in the number of young people receiving a COVID-19 booster compared to those of older ages has not been linked to a surge in hospitalizations.

Recently released information from three major healthcare systems, two in New York and one in Israel, indicated that a lack of COVID-19 booster doses for younger people are not becoming severely ill and did not increase hospitalizations.

More...

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/recent-evidence-from-three-major-healthcare-systems-suggests-lack-of-covid-19-vaccine-boosters-does-not-increase-hospitalization-video/ 



Stogie1020
3 years ago

Anyone who signed that early letter to the Lancet calling this a conspiracy theory should be fired.
DrMaddVibe
3 years ago

Anyone who signed that early letter to the Lancet calling this a conspiracy theory should be fired.

Stogie1020 wrote:




They need to be beaten with the Science.
MACS
3 years ago
We all knew it. People wanted to be obtuse.

Same with those calling people who didn't want to take a jab "grandma killers". Turns out their precious jab did exactly nothing to help, and may have even caused more harm than good. Time will tell...
ZRX1200
3 years ago
Or ivermectin….
RayR
3 years ago
Woody Harrelson goes off-script on Saturday Night Live.
COVID Marxists go wild!
That #*!&@ Conspiracy Theorist! How dare he!
Hate ensues!


Actor Tells Truth, Media Goes Berserk

By Tom Woods
March 1, 2023

By now you may have heard about the opening monologue that actor Woody Harrelson delivered on Saturday Night Live this past weekend.

Given the hysteria surrounding it, I assumed it had to be a full-throated attack on Big Pharma.

So I watched it, and 95 percent of it was just normal comedy.

I’m about to share with you the entirety of the portion that sent the Establishment, and those poor and pathetic souls who for some reason feel compelled to defend the Establishment, into a fit.

Harrelson tells a fanciful story about reading a movie script:

"Okay, so the movie goes like this. The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes. And people can only come out if they take the cartel’s drugs and keep taking them over and over.

I threw the script away. I mean, who is going to believe that crazy idea being forced to do drugs? I do that voluntarily all day long."


That’s it.

It’s obvious enough that the story is a reference to our Covid experience, with the lockdowns and the mandates. But note that he even softens the blow by ending it with a joke about his drug habit.

Well, this little passage — which, for heaven’s sake, obviously has the ring of truth to it — sent the media into hysterics.

Remember, Harrelson is insinuating that the media are all bought and paid for. And here’s how they reacted, as if trying to prove his point:

More...

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/03/thomas-woods/actor-tells-truth-media-goes-berserk/ 






DrMaddVibe
3 years ago
Fauci's Lies Exposed... Jim Jordan Goes Ballistic Over Scientists' Lab-Leak Flip-Flop



Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) was on fire Wednesday during the first COVID select subcommittee investigating the origins of Covid-19, where former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield said he was "sidelined" from internal debates over the origins of the virus, and that former White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci didn't appreciate Redfield's support for the theory that it emerged from a lab.

"This was an a priori decision that there’s one point of view that we’re going to put out there, and anyone who doesn’t agree with it is going to be sidelined," said Redfield. "And as I say, I was only the CDC director, and I was sidelined."

The 71-year-old Redfield told Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) that his support for the lab leak theory likely prompted his exclusion.
Former CDC director Robert Redfield

"I think I made it very clear in January [2020] to all of them why we had to aggressively pursue this," he said. "And I let them know as a virologist that I didn’t see that this was anything like SARS or MERS. … And they knew that was how I was thinking."

Jordan then focused the conversation to two top Fauci advisers - Dr. Kristian Andersen and Dr. Robert Garry - who suddenly changed their stance on lab leak theory. The two notably emailed Fauci on Jan. 31, 2020 where they suggested that anomalies in the virus pointed to a non-natural origin. According to Anderson, the virus had "unusual features" that "(potentially) look engineered," and that other scientists "all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory."

Jordan went on a tear...

"So three days after they say it came from a lab, they changed their position, and the only intervening event was a conference call with Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins. Again, a call that Mr. Redfield (CDC Director at the time) was not allowed to be on ... And then three months later, Shazam! They get 9 million bucks from Dr. Fauci. Why, isn't that something?"

Watch (and consider following @VigilantFox):

Meanwhile, lawyers have claimed that statements by Fauci under oath aren't credible due to contradicting evidence.

As The Epoch Times notes,

That includes the claim that Fauci didn’t think he had ever met with Dr. Ralph Baric, an American virologist who helped perform risky research on bat coronaviruses in China.

“I know who he is. I doubt if I’ve ever met him,” Fauci said during the late 2022 deposition—the first time he answered questions under oath since the pandemic began.

Fauci acknowledged the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which he headed until around the New Year, provided funding for Baric.

“But you don’t remember ever meeting him in person?” he was asked.

“I don’t recall. I could have met him. I run into several thousands of scientists that we refer to, but I don’t recall, certainly, having a relationship with him,” Fauci responded.

But Fauci’s official calendar lists a one-on-one meeting with Baric on Feb. 11, 2020. And a newly revealed message from a professor who recounted Baric’s account of the meeting showed they talked about man-made virus combinations.

“I talked to Ralph for a long time last night. He sounds beat,” Matt Frieman, a University of Maryland professor, wrote in a Feb. 18, 2020, message. “He said he sat in Fauci’s office talking about the outbreak and chimeras.”

A chimera is a combination of viruses.

The materials, unearthed from Freedom of Information Act requests from the nonprofits OpentheBooks.com, Judicial Watch, and U.S. Right to Know, and other evidence, including a 2020 email of talking points for Fauci that mentioned Baric being “on our team,” show that “Dr. Fauci’s testimony on this point is not credible,” the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana told a federal court in the new filing.

Fauci also claimed that he was not “100 percent certain” of the name of Dr. Shi Zhengli, known for her experiments on bat viruses in China. “I get sometimes confused with Asian names,” Fauci testified.

“Yet Dr. Shi Zhengli, the so-called ‘bat woman,’ is world-renowned as the researcher who may have caused the COVID-19 pandemic, and has been so since the beginning of the pandemic, and the name ‘Shi’ is included in the title of the article that Dr. Fauci forwarded to Dr. Hugh Auchincloss after midnight on February 1, 2020. Dr. Fauci’s testimony is not credible on this point,” Andrew Bailey and Jeff Landry, the attorneys general, wrote.

Fauci also repeatedly said in the deposition that he could not recall details about a secret phone call, held after he and deputies discussed how the NIAID had funded coronavirus experiments in Wuhan, China, where the first COVID-19 cases were detected. Shortly after the existence of the call became public, though, Fauci told USA Today, “I remember it very well.”

“Dr. Fauci’s testimony about lack of recall is not credible,” the lawyers said.

They also noted that when Fauci did characterize the call, he said that it involved a “good faith discussion back and forth between people who knew each other” and that “the general feeling among the participants on the call is that they wanted to get down to the truth and not wild speculation about things.” After the call, a number of participants wrote papers decrying the theory that COVID-19 started in a lab.

“Dr. Fauci thus seeks to have his cake and eat it too—he claims both to remember little or nothing of what was said on the call, and to clearly remember that the entire discussion was done in good faith and without any bias,” the attorneys general said. “In any event, subsequent communications and events make clear that Dr. Fauci’s testimony on this point is not credible.”

The filing was issued to U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty, who is overseeing a lawsuit brought against the federal government for its censorship campaign with Big Tech firms.

The lawyers are asking Doughty to block the government from violating the First Amendment rights of Americans.


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/faucis-lies-exposed-jim-jordan-goes-ballistic-over-scientists-lab-leak-flip-flop 



But let's spend billions of dollars doing something that's NEVER been done before with hardly any real research going on to back it....

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/covid-not-deadly-enough-justify-risk-fast-track-vaccines-chris-whitty-told-uk-govt
JGKAMIN
3 years ago
How convenient of the good doctor…how long until we start hearing about his “dementia” or some other excuse that will allow the secrets to die with him?
8trackdisco
3 years ago
Here's the link for the whole story.

https://www.thefp.com/p/is-gain-of-function-research-a-risk 

Here's a bit of the content. Fan of the article because it is well structured, reasonable and stays away from the right and left ditches.

Is Gain-of-Function Research a ‘Risk Worth Taking’? Or ‘Insanity’?
A lab leak in Wuhan may have led to the outbreak of Covid. So what were scientists doing there? And why?
By David Zweig
March 6, 2023


For years, our officials—from Anthony Fauci on down—maintained that Covid-19 probably originated from a natural pathway in Wuhan, China. Bats in a wet market, some said.

But according to a new report, the U.S. Energy Department believes the virus likely escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology before going on to kill millions around the world. The FBI and a number of prominent scientists also think Covid may have leaked from the lab, where researchers were allegedly conducting “gain-of-function” experiments on coronaviruses, potentially making them deadlier.

Before the winter of 2020, most people had never heard of this type of research, which goes on in labs around the world. But over the past few years, experts have made the compelling argument that it is so risky it could endanger humanity.

And yet, the Biden administration remains supportive of gain-of-function research “to help prevent future pandemics” as long as it’s done safely and with transparency, according to John Kirby, National Security Council coordinator for strategic communications.

But can any of this research ever be done safely or transparently? And is it worth the risks?........





DrMaddVibe
3 years ago
Remember "Follow The Science" they said.

LOL

Weird.
BuckyB93
3 years ago
One thing that blows me away is why Fauci and his minions are not being scrutinized and under investigation for his hands in this whole fiasco.

Another thing is why the government and businesses that get state and federal money still require employees to get the "vaccine" and keep up with the boosters that don't work (fact not opinion).

One job I'm looking at stipulates:
"Must be able to satisfactorily pass a check conducted by the Criminal History Systems Board (CORI check); a background check satisfactory to the university and must be fully vaccinated and boosted for COVID-19 or have a documented and approved exemption."

I'll support having to pass a CORI check. I have no problem with that to ensure that your employees are not on a most wanted list or have a history of criminal behavior stuff.

What bothers me is the requirement of being "fully vax" for COVID and be up to date with all the boosters du jour. It's common knowledge and documented that they don't work so why mandate it as a requirement for employment?
MACS
3 years ago
BuckyB93
3 years ago
Biggest scam in generations. It's not likely that history books will reflect it as such.

There are too many players in power that want the truth to be buried.

Double 5's and a NINE!
BuckyB93
3 years ago

Huh...

MACS wrote:



To follow with your Huh...





Users browsing this topic