Along with 25 other states. SCOTUS needs to rule on this... 2nd amendment gives us all the right, and any state having laws that say anything different are violating our right. The End.
MACS wrote:
I agree, however, I see interference in State's rights by a power-hungry parliament of whores, Congress. To be clear, I do not trust Congress. [frypan] Oh, and the wrong forum! 🐴
Gene363 wrote:
Liked that O’Rourke book. Wrong forum? Actually, it belongs here.It is the chitturning of the country drawing a simple 2nd Amendment concept into something political.
8trackdisco wrote:
Would you be for all adults 18 and old have guns? In what if any circumstances would you limit or not allow?
18 for long guns, 21 for handguns. Background checks before sales (quickly, it doesn't take but a day or 2).Some people believe that allowing law abiding citizens to carry will result in more problems. I disagree. The criminals already do it. Now they'll be thinking twice before victimizing some people. And if excess deaths result, lets hope it's the bad guys dying.
Similar/same page so far.Who would be disqualified on a background check?
Felons. Crazies. Non-citizens.I don't think misdemeanor DV should be a permanent disqualifier, either. Those should be case by case, IMO. Too many variables.
And what’s all this crap about long rifles only until 21?? You can join the Navy at 17 but can’t carry a revolver?What about the 16 year old debutant? Why can’t she have a Glock to protect herself?Is it NOT true that more guns for everyone is that only way to be safe? Why are these beautiful girls not issued pistols? Don’t we want them safe??You guys are Hippocrates….
Brewha wrote:
I am not now, nor have I ever been, an ancient Greek physician
Sunoverbeach wrote:
Why does CC even matter? Is an armed citizen any more dangerous because he doesn't advertise he's carrying?
The CigarBid Forums uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close
