http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61824-2005Feb3.html?referrer=email 

Q:When do the Whitewater Gate papers Go Public?


A: Never, They all got burned and anyone surrounding them got Burned with them... RIP Vince Foster!!!!

Hog

Watergate or Whitewater?

the above link is white water papers going public...

The question I asked is when are the (Clinton) Whitewater gate papers going to be made public?? answer is Never...

Hog

Sorry Hog. I couldn't get the above link to work. It is all (white)water under the bridge anyway. Unless Hillary runs (and wins the Democratic nomination) and I don't think that she will. If New Yorkers want to have her represent them, so be it. Who am I to say who they elect.

I think she's going to have a hard time holding her seat in 06??

Hog

Could be. The mid-terms are going to be interesting. You never know.

when will the kennedy assassination papers be released without being redacted. a little more important then whether clinton did or did not steal some money, which no one has been indicted for. let's get our priorities in order.

by the way, who killed bobby kennedy?

why do the leaders, the powerful always kill liberals. i can't think of off hand any right wing
or conservative that was killed by "the liberals."

Lincoln a Republican was killed by Booth a Democrat(liberal?)

McKinley was killed by an anarchist (liberal?)

And Garfield was killed by a socialist (liberal?)

by the way, who killed bobby kennedy?
A muslim extreamist

McKinley and Garfield were also Republicans By the way

Archduke Ferdinand was killed by a Serbian anarchist.
And my liberal Grandma was run over by a conservative reindeer.

And JFK was actually fairly conservative, even though he was a Democrat.

JFk was in the times when they had Real Democrats in Washington... now they got a bunch of money hungry pansy's who are looking out for themselves and couldn't give a rat's f**k about real Americans or America!!!!

2006 and 2008 elections are going to show more of the Peoples feelings on these clowns!!!!

Hog

EI, I understand your point but I think that there are better examples. I’m not sure that you could really say that Booth was a liberal (unless you consider all actors Liberals – Ha, Ha!!). I haven’t found any indication that he was a Democrat either. Anyway, being a Virginia Democrat during the Civil war would have put you on the conservative side of the fence (by today’s definition). The Democrats were for states rights and they were anti-abolitionists (not that this is a conservative idea). I also don’t agree that an Anarchist (no government) or a socialist (governmental control of production and distribution of goods, etc…) is necessarily liberal. Also Leon Czolgosz was not an official member of the Anarchist movement (like Emma Goldman, etc…) He was just a loser nobody. Charles Julius Guiteau was a crazy dirt bag who was even a bigger loser than Czolgosz. I can find no evidence that he ever belonged to any political party. He did try to join a free love movement in upstate NY but they just took his money and kicked him out. Oh well...

Buckwheat

thanks

"being a Virginia Democrat during the Civil war"
Booth was a Maryland Democrat Which is even today a hotbed of liberlism

"Leon Czolgosz was not an official member of the Anarchist"
Didn't know they had membership cards

"Charles Julius Guiteau" " try to join a free love movement in upstate NY"
Uhhhh that would make him a liberal

EI, you missed the point. You really can't take either party affiliation from 100 years ago and consider them liberal or conservative by today's definitions of these words.

Personally, I don't think that you can take today's party affiliations and brand someone a liberal or conservative by their party affiliation. Hell, everyone falls at one time or another into the liberal or conservative camps on some issues.

Sorry for the rant. You have to agree that Booth, Czolgosz & Guiteau were just crazy idiots. Particularly Czolgosz and Guiteau. I didn't really intend to highjack this thread with this debate. I just don't understand why everyone who belongs to the Democratic Party is branded a liberal and conversely why everyone who is a Republican, a conservative. Hell, I've always been a Republican and you probably think that I'm a liberal.

HOG,

"JFk was in the times when they had Real Democrats in Washington... now they got a bunch of money hungry pansy's who are looking out for themselves and couldn't give a rat's f**k about real Americans or America!!!!"

Name a politician that DOES give a rat's f**k about real Americans or America. The only one that comes close that I can think of off the top of my head is McCain.

"Name a politician that DOES give a rat's f**k about real Americans or America. The only one that comes close that I can think of off the top of my head is McCain."
Uncleb
I guess I needed to be more clear?? McCain is one of them in the light of politics from Washington... there are many more behind the light that still care... you just don't see their names as big... some of these are Democrats also!!! who usually don't last a second seat in the house because they're not toting the same bag of chips the party wants them to hold onto....

I and my Mother have sent "Unanswered" letters to McCain because he's on the Senate Arms commitie... and my followings of the man I am not so impressed with him as I am other Democratic Senators ;0)

Hog