http://reason.com/blog/2017/01/04/georgia-tech-climatologist-judith-curry 

This article is from a new (to me) source of information that I find more credible than most.
After reading this article I jumped to her blog and was almost overwhelmed.

Judith Curry, an actual climatologist, has resigned from her post at Georgia Tech for no reason other than she finds it no longer possible to guide and teach students to use actual science in the field of climatology. She recognizes and has witnessed first hand how scientific integrity is career suicide when dealing with this highly political subject matter.

She does not deny climate change, man-made or otherwise. She will join the private sector (i.e. not reliant on government funding and "guidance") and will continue in the field.

But never mind that. It's settled science, so we shouldn't discuss such matters. Right?

...yawn...

I had you at "boring".

ok

The whole of academia needs to be undone and rebuilt

I'm still waiting for Victor to come tell us this isn't a reliable news source because it isn't Jezebel...

what do you call a vegan with diarrhea?

Salad shooter

So she doesn't disagree with it... but believes scientific integrity is at risk.

... I'm not sure I understand the point.

A person quit their job, we don't really know why, but we take her reason at face value and any government funded research is bunk

dude you are slow

But she's not denying climate change so tail wins 10 Internet points... right?

Overpaid BEOTCH with tenure & amazing benefits package gets burned out after suffering through years of GenX-ers and is now saddled with
"Helicopter MILLENIALS" who can't WIPE their own azzes or call home on their I-phones to ask mommy what they should pick in the cafeteria line....

No wonder she QUIT...

Musta' got a h3LL of a raise, better benefits, 20 year contract and guaranteed government grants to the private sector company for her "RESEARCH"...

^^ PROLLY why ...just sayin...and stuff...

today personal blogs are more credible money makers than institutions

Of course you don't.
There hasn't been a consensus to tell you what to believe yet.

Try to keep up.

We'll accept this as an apology for not reading it.
We understand.
Sciency stuff confuses you anyhow.

If climate change were a homeless dude with no pants, then yes.

Actually, that's the exact OPPOSITE.
But we'll roll with it.

I'm sorry

I keep yawning every time I see that someone else posts on this thread...can't help myself.

Hiccup

Any rogue scientist is tails new hero.