LawOfMD
9 years ago

Seems like most guys in the rock and roll business have histories that are multiple-choice, so who knows. I've never met him face to face, but communicated with him a bit in the past, back when he started his reviews. They were really off the wall back then, he's toned them down a bit since. That was all back before all his medical stuff hit and was a very rough time for him, he was very agitated. Phil is a pretty cynical guy to begin with, that just amplified things.

I'm sure most of his cigars do come gifted to him. From what I recall, the pairing up with a manufacturer was something many years ago, it was one or two small time producers or shops (or both) that got in touch with him after finding his original review to be favorable. I believe there was some sort of arrangement, but I don't know if that still exists or if they even exist anymore.

Thunder.Gerbil wrote:



heh. you'll enjoy this: Here's a snapshot of his latest review. Love this guy's honesty

"Cornelius & Anthony is a solid cigar company. It is a mystery to me how they let this new revised blend fly off the rails. Is this why there are no reviews of this cigar? Is everyone afraid of pissing off C&A? I’m not. But of course, I will burn another bridge by being truthful.

Manufacturers are very sensitive about what is written about them. The slightest critical comments doom the writer to be taken off their reviewer’s list. So be it. I am beholden to my readers, not the manufacturer.


https://kohnhed.com/2017/03/06/cornelius-anthony-meridian-2016-cigar-reviews-by-the-katman/ 

I know of no other cigar reviewer that appears more loyal to his readers than this.
Jayslow
9 years ago

There's nothing quite like bragging about tax evasion on an online cigar forum!

opelmanta1900 wrote:



Hey, If Canadian customs doesn't bother to charge me tax/duty while coming through, i'm not going to complain! 🍺

@LawOfMD,
I'm starting to like this guy!! Read a handful of reviews last night and this afternoon and he's really quite detailed in his explanations on taste etc. Totally helpful!
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
9 years ago

heh. you'll enjoy this: Here's a snapshot of his latest review. Love this guy's honesty

"Cornelius & Anthony is a solid cigar company. It is a mystery to me how they let this new revised blend fly off the rails. Is this why there are no reviews of this cigar? Is everyone afraid of pissing off C&A? I’m not. But of course, I will burn another bridge by being truthful.

Manufacturers are very sensitive about what is written about them. The slightest critical comments doom the writer to be taken off their reviewer’s list. So be it. I am beholden to my readers, not the manufacturer.


https://kohnhed.com/2017/03/06/cornelius-anthony-meridian-2016-cigar-reviews-by-the-katman/ 

I know of no other cigar reviewer that appears more loyal to his readers than this.

LawOfMD wrote:




Had to look at this just to see... cause I'm curious like that.

I have to call bs on this guy and do not find him credible.

He rated an LFD Andalusian Bull sub-par saying that it might just be that he's not a fan of DR tobacco.

Then he goes and rates all the latest and greatest AVOs at 95 (DR tobacco if I remember right), but the Davidoffs get little love in the 70s. Padrons, forget about it, he's not giving up a good review for a $20+ MSRP cigar... period.


And in between his cigar reviews, he hammers out weed reviews left and right (I'm guessing this guy is stoned a lot).

Anyway, the only pattern I can see is that if he can get the smokes cheap on cbid, he gives it a great review. If it costs him as much as a gram of weed, then he kicks the s#17 out of it into the dirt.

So, I would say if you want to get fair reviews, you would have to use a sliding scale. For cheap yard gars you can get cheap on cbid, your sliding scale rating for a good cigar would be between 90 and 95 where anything less is trash.

If it's a premium smoke with a $10 to $15, then your scale is 85 to 92.

If it's an ultra-premium, you would use the scale 75 to 85.



Edit:

Ok, read a few more, I was wrong, he seems to be a boutique fan.
LawOfMD
9 years ago

Hey, If Canadian customs doesn't bother to charge me tax/duty while coming through, i'm not going to complain! 🍺

@LawOfMD,
I'm starting to like this guy!! Read a handful of reviews last night and this afternoon and he's really quite detailed in his explanations on taste etc. Totally helpful!

Jayslow wrote:

:thumbs up: I agree. I spent the better part of last night trying to source some 5-ers of his top 25. Tough to do as most are sold out, short run smokes.
Kerbey
9 years ago

:thumbs up: I agree. I spent the better part of last night trying to source some 5-ers of his top 25. Tough to do as most are sold out, short run smokes.

LawOfMD wrote:






Don't post much. Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt. Heh.

I'm a fan of the Katman's reviews as well. He can be funny at times and tells it like it is. He has a long list of cigars in the $5-8 range and a large list of boutiques that he has enjoyed. Could be a good place to start.

See links below.

$5.00-8.00 list:

https://kohnhed.com/2014/03/05/the-katmans-list-of-174-great-cigars-in-the-5-00-8-00-range-cigar-reviews-by-the-katman/ 


Boutique list:

https://kohnhed.com/2014/03/07/the-katmans-best-226-boutique-brandsblends-cigar-reviews-by-the-katman/ 

The rock&roll stories are a bonus.
delta1
9 years ago
Welcome Jayslow, you've set a new record for expansiveness from an intro post and thread. You started with a fairly common request for recommendations for must try cigars (never sticks) and the recurring theme about shortage of space for your burgeoning cache (picking up 99cobra's point about "collection" not being an apt term for stuff you will consume).

Somehow we veered into international monetary exchange rates, guns, buying cigars in Canada, killing bears, nature of criminals, cigar magazines that have a gay orientation, authenticity of published cigar reviews, pandering in the cigar industry, a rave about a cigar named (oxymoronically) after Trump followers, criminal tax evasion, elbow rubbing with an obscure rock star guitarist, and trustworthiness of cigar reviews by obscure rock stars...


🍺 🇨🇮
RobertHively
9 years ago

Welcome Jayslow, you've set a new record for expansiveness from an intro post and thread. You started with a fairly common request for recommendations for must try cigars (never sticks) and the recurring theme about shortage of space for your burgeoning cache (picking up 99cobra's point about "collection" not being an apt term for stuff you will consume).

Somehow we veered into international monetary exchange rates, guns, buying cigars in Canada, killing bears, nature of criminals, cigar magazines that have a gay orientation, authenticity of published cigar reviews, pandering in the cigar industry, a rave about a cigar named (oxymoronically) after Trump followers, criminal tax evasion, elbow rubbing with an obscure rock star guitarist, and trustworthiness of cigar reviews by obscure rock stars...


🍺 🇨🇮

delta1 wrote:



LOL!
Stinkdyr
9 years ago

He's right, the socialists have screwed up Canada. They tax those poor people to death.

jjanecka wrote:




Feels a bit like home......hmmm.

:-k
Jayslow
9 years ago



Somehow we veered into international monetary exchange rates, guns, buying cigars in Canada, killing bears, nature of criminals, cigar magazines that have a gay orientation, authenticity of published cigar reviews, pandering in the cigar industry, a rave about a cigar named (oxymoronically) after Trump followers, criminal tax evasion, elbow rubbing with an obscure rock star guitarist, and trustworthiness of cigar reviews by obscure rock stars...


delta1 wrote:



Well... When you put it like thaaaat. Nothing like making it sound so dramatic ✋
Salmoneye
9 years ago

He's right, the socialists have screwed up Canada. They tax those poor people to death.

jjanecka wrote:



Yes...

But they get free colonoscopys...

So there's that...




Users browsing this topic