FuzzNJ
15 years ago

I am so very disappointed,,,

I posted this for you...

darn...

lol

wheel,

wheelrite wrote:



You posted this expecting what from me? I'm here participating.

I asked a question, you said you knew the answer, yet won't provide it.

I guess you were looking to bait me or something and it didn't work.

wheelrite
15 years ago

You posted this expecting what from me? I'm here participating.

I asked a question, you said you knew the answer, yet won't provide it.

I guess you were looking to bait me or something and it didn't work.

FuzzNJ wrote:



Well..

humor me just the same ! lol !!

but,,

It is ironic that the Dems have such a horrendous history to present day as racist and conventional Lib philosophy disregards it.

dontcha know ?
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Well..

humor me just the same ! lol !!

wheelrite wrote:



I won't. Instead of a conversation, you want a fight. Not in the mood.
wheelrite
15 years ago

I won't. Instead of a conversation, you want a fight. Not in the mood.

FuzzNJ wrote:



Fuzz...

I above all else don't like to fight..

debate,perhaps...
chiefburg
15 years ago

Fine, if you'd rather not answer, I'll move on and see if Chief answers.

FuzzNJ wrote:


Simple: The Dems cater to social programs and so-called social justice. They thrive on keeping people down and claiming to meet their needs and take care of them. The Dems do not like it when people strike out on their own and fend for themselves. Traditionally, the non-whites in this country have been held down (mostly by liberal programs) and the Dems claim to have their back and support them. This is so very obvious that I hate to even have to point it out to you.

I should just delete this post......the argument is too siimple and I don't have the energy to spar with someone who thinks their party is the savior party of this country. I despise the majority of the social programs this country has because it gives something for nothing and breeds laziness and contempt. It forces peopel to rely on the Government and that's quite the opposite of what I believe. We do need some social programs, but the majority have been abused beyond belief. Minorities will continue to vote Democratic because they are lulled into the belief they government is behind them and will take care of them.

Find someone else to argue with today. It's Memorial Day - a time to honor those who gave everything so we could be free to pursue whatever we want in this country. It's not a day to celebrate the liberals social programs.
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Simple: The Dems cater to social programs and so-called social justice. They thrive on keeping people down and claiming to meet their needs and take care of them. The Dems do not like it when people strike out on their own and fend for themselves. Traditionally, the non-whites in this country have been held down (mostly by liberal programs) and the Dems claim to have their back and support them. This is so very obvious that I hate to even have to point it out to you.

I should just delete this post......the argument is too siimple and I don't have the energy to spar with someone who thinks their party is the savior party of this country. I despise the majority of the social programs this country has because it gives something for nothing and breeds laziness and contempt. It forces peopel to rely on the Government and that's quite the opposite of what I believe. We do need some social programs, but the majority have been abused beyond belief. Minorities will continue to vote Democratic because they are lulled into the belief they government is behind them and will take care of them.

Find someone else to argue with today. It's Memorial Day - a time to honor those who gave everything so we could be free to pursue whatever we want in this country. It's not a day to celebrate the liberals social programs.

chiefburg wrote:



Dude, I didn't post the thread and didn't even argue anything yet. So f*ck off already, holy crap you got issues.

What is 'so-called social justice'?

So if the Democratic party is just holding down the non-whites, are they just too stupid to realize that's what's happening?

Do you honestly think that any social program is something most non-whites aspire to and find to be acceptable? Do you think that the whites on these programs are working hard to get off of them?

You have heard of the civil rights acts, especially 1964 right and the Southern Strategy? Do you think that has anything to do with party loyalty?

chiefburg
15 years ago
Thank you for responding as I expected. I rest my case....... Please see your mental health professional as soon as possible for the sake of your family.

Done with this thread........
wheelrite
15 years ago

Dude, I didn't post the thread and didn't even argue anything yet. So f*ck off already, holy crap you got issues.

What is 'so-called social justice'?

So if the Democratic party is just holding down the non-whites, are they just too stupid to realize that's what's happening?

Do you honestly think that any social program is something most non-whites aspire to and find to be acceptable? Do you think that the whites on these programs are working hard to get off of them?

You have heard of the civil rights acts, especially 1964 right and the Southern Strategy? Do you think that has anything to do with party loyalty?

FuzzNJ wrote:



Um .
The longest filibuster in Congressional history was by the Dems trying to block passage of the 1964 voting Rights Act.It only passed because of the Repubs...

chiefburg
15 years ago

Um .
The longest filibuster in Congressional history was by the Dems trying to block passage of the 1964 voting Rights Act.It only passed because of the Repubs...

wheelrite wrote:


Bill: Don't bother......you are completely wasting your time and energy. Or, continue if this is just for pure entertainment value.
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Thank you for responding as I expected. I rest my case....... Please see your mental health professional as soon as possible for the sake of your family.

Done with this thread........

chiefburg wrote:



I guess you don't like the Socratic method?

It appears you have some anger issues, but I don't care, it's an observation. You can't even discuss something, anything with someone who may hold a different view.

Your case is rested saying that non-whites are stupid and lazy and that's why they voted Democratic and that it is obvious and simple.

I don't and was willing to discuss it with you, thanks for answering the question. Wheel wouldn't.
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Um .
The longest filibuster in Congressional history was by the Dems trying to block passage of the 1964 voting Rights Act.It only passed because of the Repubs...

wheelrite wrote:



And his name was? Strom Thurmond.

Who pushed it through? A Democratic president who said some racist stuff in his life.

After it passed what happened? Strom and all the other dixiecrats changed parties, Nixon employed the Southern Strategy, and the south flipped from Democratic to Republican and has been voting that way regularly to this day.

It is true that the Democratic party was anti-civil rights and further back pro-slavery.
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Bill: Don't bother......you are completely wasting your time and energy. Or, continue if this is just for pure entertainment value.

chiefburg wrote:



lmao, go away as you said you would. You don't contribute anything worthwhile anyway.
ZRX1200
15 years ago
Koombaya Fuzzy.....

Koombaya......
rfenst
15 years ago
You are all freakin' warped.
ZRX1200
15 years ago
LET ROBERT BYRD REST IN .....
wheelrite
15 years ago

And his name was? Strom Thurmond.

Who pushed it through? A Democratic president who said some racist stuff in his life.

After it passed what happened? Strom and all the other dixiecrats changed parties, Nixon employed the Southern Strategy, and the south flipped from Democratic to Republican and has been voting that way regularly to this day.

It is true that the Democratic party was anti-civil rights and further back pro-slavery.

FuzzNJ wrote:



um no..

nice try..

* Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, personally filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 14 straight hours to keep it from passage
wheelrite
15 years ago
Here's more Golden Oldies..


Democrat President Woodrow Wilson, reintroduced segregation throughout the federal government immediately upon taking office in 1913.
* Democrat Senator John F. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil rights Act.
* Democrat President John F. Kennedy opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King.
* Democrat President John F. Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI.
* Democrat President Bill Clinton’s mentor was U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, an Arkansas Democrat and a supporter of racial segregation.
* Democrat President Bill Clinton interned for J. William Fulbright in 1966-67.
* Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright signed the Southern Manifesto opposing the Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision.
* Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright joined with the Dixiecrats in filibustering the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1964.
* Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

um no..

nice try..

* Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, personally filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 14 straight hours to keep it from passage

wheelrite wrote:




Sigh, here, from a source you probably trust.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,90552,00.html 

WASHINGTON — Fortified with a good rest, a steam bath and a sirloin steak, Sen. Strom Thurmond (search) talked against a 1957 civil rights bill for 24 hours and 18 minutes — longer than anyone has ever talked about anything in Congress.

The South Carolina (search) senator, then a Democrat, opened his one-man filibuster on Aug. 28, 1957, at 8:54 p.m. against the bill, which he said was unconstitutional and "cruel and unusual punishment."
Nicar
15 years ago
Sigh!!

1957 Filibuster.. longest by single person...

1964 Filibuster... longest by senate... 57 days the democrats kept it going or something like that

FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Sigh!!

1957 Filibuster.. longest by single person...

1964 Filibuster... longest by senate... 57 days the democrats kept it going or something like that

Nicar wrote:



True!

Here's more truth.

It wasn't a D vs R issue, it was a regional one.

Democrats from the north voted overwhelmingly for the 1964 bill. From the south overwhelmingly against it. Both the senate and the house. Same for the republicans.

Democrats held the south from reconstruction up to this point. The southern democrats didn't agree with their northern counterparts, became republicans, ala Thurmond. Then, seeing an opening and a way to win back the south, the republicans employed the Southern Strategy and have held the south since pretty well.
Users browsing this topic