Hernandez was a Tight End, not a wide receiver.
Although after this much jail time, that may have changed.
(thanks for the set up on that one, TW).

I was referring to Floyd but you are welcome LOL

Nobody said the Pats were altruistic. You must still be butt hurt from the steelers beating your chiefs without even getting into the endzone because you're looking for things to argue.

Nah, I'd be arguing the other way if that was the case. Besides I'm more sore about the Dallas game and my entire immediate family are Green Bay fans.

I didn't mention yourteamcheats.com because I don't care what some blog says.

Agreed, and it's a bunk sight (but brilliant of a fan base to create it...I admire that)

And truth be told, I"m just trying to wake up the usually banter-iffic towel wavers. There's a game Sunday and they're all acting like the foregone conclusion (a Pats win) is the foregone conclusion.

That we agree on

tailgater wrote:

stillers need to put it in the endzone

they will need at least 27 to beat the patsies in foxboro

gummy jones wrote:

Tight end not a wide receiver until prison joke is the best thing I have seen on this forum. Thank you tailgater, you made my day lol

sdboltsfan86 wrote:

TW, what are you talking about with Michael Floyd?

tailgater wrote:

They signed him how many days after this?

http://www.tmz.com/2016/12/20/michael-floyd-dui-arrest-video/ 


I think it was 2 or 3 days later they signed him. The dude had a BAC of .217. Of course Bill B. said he didn't realize the severity of the situation (because he is so sloppy and pays no attention to details(sound familiar?)) and of course he cant talk about it any further because it is a legal situation. I'm sure it has nothing to do with putting the need for a receiver ahead of bad behavior and was giving the dude the second chance he deserved immediately following the incident and being chastised and released by his team for being unrepentant.

I'm sure this culture had nothing to do with Hernandez.

Squeeky clean.

teedubbya wrote:

Actually .217 is aggregated. Meaning jail time. And no it is neither rape or murder. To me a conviction of murder is worse than an allegation of rape is worse than a pretty obvious comatose drunk driving.

But if you are going to accuse another team of sweeping an allegation of rape under the rug and call that bad, then signing a wr a few days after the video (wr) is pretty hard to defend.

Not saying they are worse. Just cut the holier than thou crap.

teedubbya wrote:

On my face book page from 3 years ago:

"One of the commentators really just said of Tom Brady's drastic overthrow, "Sometimes you throw the ball soooo well it just goes a little bit further than you expect it to."

opelmanta1900 wrote:

And belicheck not bowing the seriousness when signing is laughable.

Homers be homers.

teedubbya wrote:

"allegation" means you don't believe the girl.
The girl who was raped.
While her friends were held at bay, away from the restroom. Because their friend was drunk and alone with him.
In the bathroom.


Floyd was wrong and should face the consequences. But it's not in the same league with what Ben did.
If it was just consensual sex, then why the body guards to keep her friends away?
Forget bathroom. If that happened in a college dorm it would be considered rape.

tailgater wrote:

Who said anything about Belichick not knowing?

You're looking for blind faith were there isn't any. And it eats you up, so you make stuff up.
haterz be haterz.

tailgater wrote: