scompay
Monday, July 10, 2006 1:54:00 PM
It's insulting that you compare other regular humans to Brokebacks and Pillow Biters.

I am (mildly) surprised.

ruggysgirl
Monday, July 10, 2006 1:54:00 PM
Rick - re: #27 and #97. You are absolutely correct, sir! I'm glad someone was able to figure it out!
Dr Pepperhill
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:01:00 PM
It might come as a shock Compay, but many heteros like to toy around with the Mrs. in anal ways, you know, sort of break the monotony. Now are heteros who dabble in anal half-humans and sinners too? I quit worrying about who was doing who and how they did them by the time I was 20. 8track has the mentality of a ten-year-old, so he has an excuse, what's yours?
rugrunner
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:10:00 PM
Dr p, re #160

What rights don't gays have that heteroes do? I'll bet you can't find 1.

So are you saying it's now okay to call blacks porch monkeys now?

If so why can't i mention Rick and Bingo together without being called an anti-semite by you?

ruggysgirl
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:11:00 PM
Oh the guilt, the shame!!!!

Puh - leeze. Compay can look down his nose at turd burglers the same as you can look down your nose people who don't burgle turds. And I can look down my nose at crybaby liberal baby boomers. We all have our biases.

scompay
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:18:00 PM
Don’t expect me to bite at a false agenda.

Homosexuals have all the same civil rights as anyone else. They can vote, go to the school of their choice, and have full-unbiased protection of the law.

What they don’t have and want is our blessing to stab stool. Apparently, the overwhelming majority wont give them that license. Since you bring it up...till very recently it was illegal for a man and women to engage in that.

I would like to see some of the gays on this board standup for themselves.

nine999
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:21:00 PM
turd burglars?
scompay
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:24:00 PM
nine they are those who jiggle the bathroom door and don't take no for an answer.
scompay
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:25:00 PM
nine...my response was based on the assumption that you were not standing up to my challenge.
nine999
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:27:00 PM
um...did you challenge me to something?
Dr Pepperhill
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:29:00 PM
I know you're not talking about me Ruggys, because I no more qualify as a baby-boomer or a liberal than I do an ignorant bigot.

I can't believe you guys are so grossly uninformed. Recently children have been in the media for being asked to leave schools due to having gay parents, they were private schools I believe, but school of choice? no, I don't think so.

Gays do not have the same legal rights of adoption and visitation rights as straights, nor do they have the same tax rights, or employement benefits rights as straights. This inequality of rights is currently being augmented, not diminished, by mean-spirited Christian bogots with a spate of state amendments, and pressure for a national one. Gay adults suffer from this overt discrimination, as do their kids & families. It's mean spirited and unAmerican if you ask me. Crybaby liberal my a**. It's a simple matter of fairness and decency.

scompay
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:36:00 PM
Dearest Pepperhill,

You are describing the limitations faced by single people as well. Or single women.

nine999
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:42:00 PM
i hate all of you because you all look the same to me, with your 10 pt. font...

nine

scompay
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:50:00 PM
P.S.

Pepper you bring up a pivotal word--Decency.

If the gays exercised decency and discretion….they could have gotten everything they wanted and more.

It hetros came out swinging in the gay fashion about anal sex, they too would have met the same opposition.

Is it not decent to consider the majority?

nine999
Monday, July 10, 2006 2:52:00 PM
compay-

you don't watch porn?

nine

18delta
Monday, July 10, 2006 3:01:00 PM
adroomi,

you are so not fun to argue with.....lol

hell, you love me and i am not asian? i'm impressed. i thought you were predjudiced against white women....

either way i love you too......

g

Dr Pepperhill
Monday, July 10, 2006 3:01:00 PM
Nine, if I didn't know any better I would think you were covering my back against hate speech on these boards!

Compay, according to the Federalists papers American government was designed to protect the minority against the majority, not that a gay minority is exactly a threat to the heterosexual majority in any case; the heterosexual majority certainly are a threat to the gay minority however, especially lately. Moreover, the preamble to the constitution says "we the people", not "We, the heterosexual people."

In addition, straight single women have the opportinity to A) enage in consensual sex with the partner of their chosing and not suffer legal discrimination, and 😎 to marry and otian tax and employement benefits if they so choose, regardless of whether they have children or not. Homosexuals are barred from those same opportunities, which is inherently unconstitutional.

18delta
Monday, July 10, 2006 3:14:00 PM
why does being gay make you a minority? it is a choice of living, so are alcoholics going to be considered a minority now too?

if i was a single woman who chose not to marry.....does that make me a minority too?

what if i was a Christian single......i would be expected to live without sex until marriage. if i never married, then i would live a life of celibacy......would that make us a minority? are the Christians asking any more from someone "gay"....

what happens when the group of sicko's that have sex with animals decide to marry their cats/dogs? will they try to pass a law to marry them so the vet bill can be on their insurance? .......

it is all a bunch of bull if you ask me

scompay
Monday, July 10, 2006 3:25:00 PM
PEPPERHILL.

Minority needs to be protected against majority….OK lets allow bestiality, NAMBLA and more.

As per not having parental privileges, HOW IGNORANTLY INCONSIDERATE OF YOU!!!!! Gay men are denied several privileges from nature itself. They cant conceive a child, breastfeed one, nor hear the cry of a baby in their sleep. And just like the court said if they can have one fine…if not…no one ELSE’S child should be subjected through that nor is THERE ANY GOOD REASON TO DO SO, other than making the HOMOSEXUALS feel good at the cost of robbing a child of a normal childhood.!!

nine999
Monday, July 10, 2006 3:31:00 PM
does one need to go to extremes to prove a point...?

i mean really...

nine