If you felt the need to point out something that obvious, then clearly someone needed to explain to you why it was obvious.

It's ok tail. Clearly you need special assistance in understanding things.

victor809 wrote:

It can only be done by Constitutional Amendment. The Amendment would have to pass BOTH the House and the Senate by a two thirds (66.67%) majority. It would then have to be ratified by 75% of the states. Ain't gonna happen.

David

Mrs. dpnewell wrote:

Victor, you made some unique comments in this post. So I have a few questions to pose to you. Why would you consider the suburbs uncivilized? Do you think those in rural areas have no right to equal representation? And finally what system would you choose that would work better?

Speyside wrote:

Victor, you made some unique comments in this post. So I have a few questions to pose to you. Why would you consider the suburbs uncivilized? Do you think those in rural areas have no right to equal representation? And finally what system would you choose that would work better?

Speyside wrote:

Was the farming done by slaves back then?

Speyside wrote:

So you weren't part of the Chicago 7?

Speyside wrote:

Oh for FUXXXXS sake.......

Who wanted the 3/5ths????

You think the south wanted LESS votes? It was a compromise proposed by TWO NORTHERNERS.....to give the south more seats in the house than if slaves didn’t count. And it was a clever way to not let them dominate the UNITED states if they counted as a WHOLE vote......Jesus H Christ on a cracker

ZRX1200 wrote: