DrMaddVibe
4 years ago
The dullard gets to try his hand at putting someone on the Bench.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/26/supreme-court-justice-stephen-breyer-to-retire-giving-biden-a-chance-to-nominate-a-replacement.html 
DrMaddVibe
4 years ago
Democratic Supreme Court Justice Breyer Plans To Retire Before Midterms: NBC


In a midday headline that rocked Washington, NBC News reports that Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, one of the minority of liberal justices on the Court, is planning to retire before the midterms to give President Biden a chance to nominate and install a replacement.

Supreme Court justices are appointed for life, but a justice can decide to retire at any time. Some progressives had hoped to push Breyer toward retirement given his age. One group called "Demand Justice" even sent a billboard truck driving around the Supreme Court building in April with the message: "Breyer, retire. It's time for a Black woman Supreme Court justice," a reference to President Biden's vow to nominate a Black woman to the court.

However, the campaign to push for Breyer's retirement never really gained momentum in the Senate, which is responsible for voting on judicial nominations. Only a handful of Democrats have suggested they would like to see Breyer, who was nominated to the court in 1994 by President Bill Clinton, retire of his own accord - at least this was the general attitude as recently as last fall.

Perhaps the possibility that Breyer has changed his mind is a sign that the Democratic leadership is lowering its expectations ahead of November's midterms as President Biden's approval rating continues to sink.

Even if he retires and is successfully replaced by Biden, Dems would simply be left with the same number of SCOTUS seats as they had before.

Now it's time for Dems to hypocritically argue that it's 100% OK to nominate and confirm a SCOTUS justice before an election that could result in a change of which party controls Congress.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democratic-supreme-court-justice-breyer-plans-retire-midterms-nbc 
Krazeehorse
4 years ago
ZRX1200
4 years ago
At least he’s smart enough to know that Creepy Joe isn’t getting re-elected.
Sunoverbeach
4 years ago
Why did the pony ask for water?
Because he was a little horse
Dg west deptford
4 years ago
Oh, that we've already seen the damage derangement syndrome has brought us!
Speyside2
4 years ago
If the rumors are correct it won't be Harris. Look up Victoria Kolakowski.
DrMaddVibe
4 years ago

Kamala?

Krazeehorse wrote:



[-x 😳 😳

She can't cast a vote for herself.

[whip]
rfenst
4 years ago

[-x 😳 😳

She can't cast a vote for herself.

[whip]

DrMaddVibe wrote:


She's never even been a judge or law scholar.
Dg west deptford
4 years ago
Mercy, that he doesn't need to appoint transgendered minority female.
Or worse.
Is there a quota to fill Mr.President? Or do you have a soul yet?

That's how come Allah got her job

spell check?
I spoke it as kamala & that's how my phone wrote it.

Krazeehorse
4 years ago

She's never even been a judge or law scholar.

rfenst wrote:


What qualifications does she have to be selected to sit in the office one tick away from the presidency?
Krazeehorse
4 years ago

[-x 😳 😳

She can't cast a vote for herself.

[whip]

DrMaddVibe wrote:


Are you certain about that?
Mr. Jones
4 years ago
Rutttt ROOOOOWWWWW
MACS
4 years ago
The sky was falling when Trump selected justices. They seem to be following constitutional law. People over-reacted for what?

My hope is that whoever the idiot's handlers select (you know he ain't selecting anyone... he can't choose his own underwear) they are judges first, and follow the law as the constitution intended it.
RayR
4 years ago
The idiot dullard said that his nominee will have to be a black woman. Well because choosing a judge is a woke racist thing!
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
4 years ago

The idiot dullard said that his nominee will have to be a black woman. Well because choosing a judge is a woke racist thing!

RayR wrote:



You're not seeing correctly... he has a thing for black chicks obviously.
rfenst
4 years ago

The sky was falling when Trump selected justices. They seem to be following constitutional law. People over-reacted for what?

My hope is that whoever the idiot's handlers select (you know he ain't selecting anyone... he can't choose his own underwear) they are judges first, and follow the law as the constitution intended it.

MACS wrote:


There are two theories of Constitutional interpretation. One is to apply the Constitution on its face (textualism). The other is that the Constitution is "a living, breathing" road map that should be applied based on the basis on modern/current socity's needs. Two very different things, neither of which is wrong or right.
rfenst
4 years ago

The idiot dullard said that his nominee will have to be a black woman. Well because choosing a judge is a woke racist thing!

RayR wrote:


He won't pick a conservative textualist and we all know that. As long as I believe whoever he picks has the requisite skills, I don't care who it is because it just won't mater for like 20 years. The fact that it bothers you that it will be a qualified black woman says a lot about you.
Krazeehorse
4 years ago

As long as I believe whoever he picks has the requisite skills, I don't care who it is because it just won't mater for like 20 years.

rfenst wrote:



You are correct that it won't make much difference for 20 years or so. The immediate effects depending on how far left the candidate is might be felt by democrats that hold office in red states.
rfenst
4 years ago

The idiot dullard said that his nominee will have to be a black woman. Well because choosing a judge is a woke racist thing!

RayR wrote:


I'd bet your happy that the suggested candidates aren't Muslim, Buddhist, Mormon or the like.
Users browsing this topic