rfenst wrote:Interesting that you brought up Woodstock. It is a good example to consider. As we look back on it historically and culturally, it was a then misunderstood, significant socio-economic event that is the hallmark of an era of turbulent change. If you had asked the young adults who attended Woodstock what they really wanted, you would have heard things like: "love", peace", "the end of war", "integration", "equal rights" and other now seemingly amorphous terms. "We want change. And stuff" should not be underestimated right now. Likewise, criticizing a movement that doesn't have a leader or has a less than ideal organizational basis could cause one to miss upcoming or ongoing change. As I think some more about this (not the particular messages), I think that the longer we have job problems and perceptions of impending economic doom (which may even be accurate), the more likely populist movements could grow and strengthen towards significance. So, I just don't think it is wise to dismiss a movement so early when such movements on the right or left of the spectrum have brought about so much change, for better or worse, throughout history.
Woodstock is a good example because the half million or so people who attended did so by breaking in. They then went on to destroy the grounds and demand that the authorities provide food and water. Gratis, of course.
Then the generation of Love and Peace went on to become the wall street CEO's that today's occupiers are b*tching about.
Is this really what we want? A generation who gets their way by complaining rather than doing?
A segment of our population who need safety in numbers rather then letting their voice be heard by taking their business elsewhere, or by voting in the proper candidates, or by making something of themselves and maybe build a corporation that embodies their utipian socialistic goals?
In a capitalistic market, if these people truly represent a populist movement, won't corporations take advantage of this by targeting their business?
Shouldn't these people all own Fords rather than one of the foreign cars or a domestic government motors vehicle?
Couldn't they take their banking to the small local banks?
Buy their goods from small local shops?
And most importantly, shouldn't these protests be outside the various colleges and universities instead of on wall street?
Tuitions have gone up must faster than inflation. Hell, tuition has risen faster than even healthcare costs.
Half of the young adults who are protesting are complaining about tuition bills. $120k in debt and no job. But they blame the corproations for not having the work load to hire, rather than blaming the colleges for over-charging for a useless document.
This is class warfare. And it started not with the recession, but rather with the president, who has endorsed this rubbish from the start.