America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

The Clinton campaign called Trump a bully............................ isnt Hilldog the one that bashed down Willys whores?

kind of like the eagles

freak

Them damn activist judges.

This couldn't be true, Hilldog said nobody hacked in to her account so it must be true. She checked right before she wiped it clean with a dust cloth and lemon Pledge.

i think she was juss making it easy so the terrorists could have hacking jobs and give up terrorism

Near the beginning of a recent interview, an FBI investigator broached a topic with longtime Hillary Clinton aide Cheryl Mills that her lawyer and the Justice Department had agreed would be off limits, according to several people familiar with the matter.

Mills and her lawyer left the room — though both returned a short time later — and prosecutors were somewhat taken aback that their FBI colleague had ventured beyond what was anticipated, the people said.

Investigators consider Mills — who served as chief of staff while Clinton was secretary of state — to be a cooperative witness. But the episode demonstrates some of the tension surrounding the criminal probe into possible mishandling of classified information involving the leading Democratic presidential candidate. In the coming weeks, prosecutors and FBI agents hope to be able to interview Clinton herself as they work to bring the case to a close.

The incident was described to The Washington Post by several people, including U.S. law enforcement officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing and those involved could face professional consequences for discussing it publicly.

It is not completely unknown for FBI agents and prosecutors to diverge on interview tactics and approach, and the people familiar with the matter said Mills answered investigators’ questions. Mills and her lawyer, Beth Wilkinson, also asked for breaks more than once to confer, the people said.

The questions that were considered off limits had to do with the procedure used to produce emails to the State Department so they could possibly be released publicly, the people said. Mills, an attorney herself, was not supposed to be asked questions about that — and ultimately never was in the recent interview — because it was considered confidential as an example of attorney-client privilege, the people said.

So far, investigators have found scant evidence tying Clinton to criminal wrongdoing, though they are still probing the case aggressively and charges have not been ruled out. In recent weeks, they have been interviewing Mills and other aides. One former State Department staffer who worked on Hillary Clinton’s private email server, Bryan Pagliano, was granted immunity so he would cooperate as part of the probe.

There is no indication a grand jury has been convened in the case.

In response to this story, Wilkinson said, “Ms. Mills has cooperated with the government.” The Clinton campaign also did not provide a response, but spokesman Brian Fallon has said repeatedly that Clinton is willing to answer investigators’ questions, and he added in a recent statement that “we hope and expect that anyone else who is asked would do the same.”

Clinton herself said on CBS’s “Face The Nation” Sunday that she has “made it clear I’m more than ready to talk to anybody, anytime” and that she looked forward to the inquiry being “wrapped up.”

In an interview with The Washington Post last year, Mills agreed of Clinton’s email “if you could do it again, you’d just do it again differently,” but Mills said she did not recall the topic “being a major area of conversation or engagement.”

“I wish there had been a lot more thought and deliberation around it, but I can’t tell you that I can offer you that insight that there was,” she said. “I think it was just a continuation of a process that she had been engaged in, in terms of using her own account, and it was consistent with what the Department had seen in the past.”

Mills said in the interview that she did not recall having conversations about security vulnerabilities. She would not say then whether she had spoken to the FBI but offered the general assurance that “we’ve obviously sought to be, to cooperate with the FBI and to provide them whatever information they’ve needed to be able to conduct the inquiry that they’re doing.”

Her attorney, Wilkinson, is a seasoned lawyer who handled many high-profile cases when she worked at the Justice Department as an assistant U.S. attorney. She received the department’s highest award for the prosecution of the Oklahoma City bombers.

Spokesmen for the FBI, the Justice Department and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia declined to comment.

The issue of Clinton’s use of a private email server was referred to the FBI in July after the Office of the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community found that some of the emails that traversed her server contained classified material. A Washington Post analysis of Clinton’s publicly released correspondence found Clinton wrote 104 emails that she sent using her private server while secretary of state that the government has since said contain classified information. The Post also found, though, emails with classified information written by about 300 other people inside and outside the government.

Critics of Clinton have said her use of a private server exposed sensitive information to a possible breach, and Clinton herself has said using it was a mistake.

Brought to you by the producers of the Jade Helm conspiracy. Remember to stay home and be vigilant on November 8 because that's the day Obama is coming for your guns.

Hillary's team prepares for the worst as she finds herself in a perfect storm of legal misery

The bad legal news for Hillary Clinton continued to cascade upon her presidential hopes during the past week in what has amounted to a perfect storm of legal misery. Here is what happened.

Last week, Mrs. Clinton’s five closest advisers when she was Secretary of State, four of whom remain close to her and have significant positions in her presidential campaign, were interrogated by the FBI. These interrogations were voluntary, not under oath, and done in the presence of the same legal team which represented all five aides.

The atmosphere was confrontational, as the purpose of the interrogations is to enable federal prosecutors and investigators to determine whether these five are targets or witnesses. Stated differently, the feds need to decide if they should charge any of these folks as part of a plan to commit espionage, or if they will be witnesses on behalf of the government should there be such a prosecution; or witnesses for Mrs. Clinton.

In the same week, a federal judge ordered the same five persons to give videotaped testimony in a civil lawsuit against the State Department which once employed them in order to determine if there was a “conspiracy” -- that’s the word used by the judge -- in Mrs. Clinton’s office to evade federal transparency laws. Stated differently, the purpose of these interrogations is to seek evidence of an agreement to avoid the Freedom of Information Act requirements of storage and transparency of records, and whether such an agreement, if it existed, was also an agreement to commit espionage -- the removal of state secrets from a secure place to a non-secure place.

Also earlier this week, the State Department revealed that it cannot find the emails of Bryan Pagliano for the four years that he was employed there. Who is Bryan Pagliano? He is the former information technology expert, employed by the State Department to problem shoot Mrs. Clinton’s entail issues.

Pagliano was also personally employed by Mrs. Clinton. She paid him $5,000 to migrate her regular State Department email account and her secret State Department email account from their secure State Department servers to her personal, secret, non-secure server in her home in Chappaqua, New York. That was undoubtedly a criminal act. Pagliano either received a promise of non-prosecution or an actual order of immunity from a federal judge. He is now the government’s chief witness against Mrs. Clinton.

It is almost inconceivable that all of his emails have been lost. Surely this will intrigue the FBI, which has reportedly been able to retrieve the emails Mrs. Clinton attempted to wipe from her server.

While all of this has been going on, intelligence community sources have reported about a below the radar screen, yet largely known debate in the Kremlin between the Russian Foreign Ministry and the Russian Intelligence Services. They are trying to come to a meeting of the minds to determine whether the Russian government should release some 20,000 of Mrs. Clinton’s emails that it obtained either by hacking her directly or by hacking into the email of her confidante, Sid Blumenthal.

As if all this wasn’t enough bad news for Mrs. Clinton in one week, the FBI learned last week from the convicted international hacker, who calls himself Guccifer, that he knows how the Russians came to possess Mrs. Clinton’s emails; and it is because she stored, received and sent them from her personal, secret, non-secure server.

Mrs. Clinton has not been confronted publicly and asked for an explanation of her thoughts about the confluence of these events, but she has been asked if the FBI has reached out to her. It may seem counter-intuitive, but in white collar criminal cases, the FBI gives the targets of its investigations an opportunity to come in and explain why the target should not be indicted.

This is treacherous ground for any target, even a smart lawyer like Mrs. Clinton. She does not know what the feds know about her. She faces a damned-if-she-does and damned-if-she-doesn’t choice here.

Any lie and any materially misleading statement -- and she is prone to both -- made to the FBI can form the basis for an independent criminal charge against her. This is the environment that trapped Martha Stewart. Hence the standard practice among experienced counsel is to decline interviews by the folks investigating their clients.

But Mrs. Clinton is no ordinary client. She is running for president. She lies frequently. We know this because, when asked if the FBI has reached out to her for an interview, she told reporters that neither she nor her campaign had heard from the FBI; but she couldn’t wait to talk to the agents.

That is a mouthful, and the FBI knows it. First, the FBI does not come calling upon her campaign or even upon her. The Department of Justice prosecutors will call upon her lawyers -- and that has already been done, and Mrs. Clinton knows it. So her statements about the FBI not calling her or the campaign were profoundly misleading, and the FBI knows that.

Mrs. Clinton’s folks are preparing for the worst. They have leaked nonsense from “U.S. officials” that the feds have found no intent to commit espionage on the part of Mrs. Clinton. Too bad these officials -- political appointees, no doubt -- skipped or failed Criminal Law 101. The government need not prove intent for either espionage or for lying to federal agents.

And it prosecutes both crimes very vigorously.


Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/05/12/hillarys-team-prepares-for-worst-as-finds-herself-in-perfect-storm-legal-misery.html


I have MUCH respect for Napolitano. He should be on the Supreme Court if not Chief Justice! His takes are tempered with past cases and reality and to me carry weight. He speaks with measure and isn't a talking head bleating to hear his own voice heard.

Seriously?


Look I get you want to play for the team and all, but if you cannot see the track record with him or tempered his wisdom with this article I cannot help you.

Sometimes you have to open the curtains to let the sunshine in.

Napolitano isn't very impressive to me. Maybe he was at some point but he has sold out and is a shill. He is very hard to take seriously. To me he is much like greta. Toobin is more credible than him and that's sad.

I don't know what they future holds for this but my guess is it shares the same fate as the birth certificate, whitewater, that ben gay place, mccain's love child, area 51, chem trails, the autism MMR link, etc. Pipe dream and that dog won't hunt. I hope I'm wrong.

You Know Those Missing Hillary Emails? Russia Might Leak 20,000 of Them


Hillary Clinton sits at the center of a raging firestorm concerning her arrangement of a private email account and server set up in her home — from which top secret information may have been deleted. But despite Bernie Sanders’ apparent annoyance with the “damn emails,” the scandal just exponentially intensified, when Judge Andrew Napolitano revealed on Monday that Russia has possession of around 20,000 of Clinton’s emails — leaving open the possibility her deletions might not have been permanent after all.

“There’s a debate going on in the Kremlin between the Foreign Ministry and the Intelligence Services about whether they should release the 20,000 of Mrs. Clinton’s emails that they have hacked into,” Napolitano told Fox News’ Megyn Kelly in an interview for The Kelly File.

With Clinton’s repeated claims she employed the personal email server only for mundane communications and non-sensitive State matters having been proven outright lies, the deletions of 31,830 emails — in the new context of Napolitano’s statement — have suddenly become remarkably relevant.

As the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton’s questionable email practices deepens, the question of who had access to what information previously located on the former secretary of state’s server is now more critical than ever.

One such individual, Romanian hacker Guccifer, who was abruptly extradited to the United States, revealed he had easily and repeatedly accessed Clinton’s personal server — and he wasn’t the only one.

“For me, it was easy,” the hacker, whose given name is Marcel Lehel Lazar, exclusively told Fox News; “easy for me, for everybody.”

If Guccifer and Napolitano are right, Russia may, indeed, have possession of highly-sensitive information courtesy of Clinton’s arrogant failure to adhere to the obligation to use a government email account during her tenure as secretary — a situation worsened by the now-mendacious claim no sensitive information had been sent through the personal account.

In fact, if Guccifer is to be believed — as his extradition by the U.S. indicates — news of the Kremlin having obtained potentially top-secret material may be the tip of a gargantuan iceberg. Using a readily available program, the Romanian hacker also claimed he observed “up to 10, like, IPs from other parts of the world” during sessions on Clinton’s personal server. If just one of those unknown parties was connected to Russia, who the other nine might be could be central to the FBI’s decision whether or not to charge Clinton for mishandling classified information.

Adding yet another nail in the coffin case against Hillary on Thursday, the Hill reported conservative watchdog Judicial Watch revealed, pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request, frustration with technical difficulties in obtaining a secure phone line led the secretary to direct a top aide to abandon the effort and call her without the necessary security in place.


“I give up. Call me on my home [number],” Clinton wrote in a February 2009 email from the newly-released batch — on the also notoriously unsecured server — to then-chief of staff, Cheryl Mills.

Though the email thread contains no confirmation such a call was ever made on the unsecured phone line, it evidences still more of the same flagrant disregard for national security apparently peppering Clinton’s practices during her time at the State Department.

“This drip, drip of new Clinton emails show Hillary Clinton could not care less about the security of her communications,” noted Judicial Watch president, Tom Fitton, in a statement cited by the Hill. “How many other smoking gun emails are Hillary Clinton and her co-conspirators in the Obama administration hiding from the American people?”

For a putative presidential hopeful, Hillary Clinton certainly doesn’t appear to appreciate the imperative for keeping matters of national security obscured from … anyone.

http://theantimedia.org/russia-leak-hillary-emails/

"supreme court got second amendment wrong"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lP3wjxJwlk

Just how many different investigations are the Clintons, and their charities, currently under???

While Hilldog is clamoring for the woman vote and bashing Trump, this little doozy appears:

Sick Truth About Bill Clinton and Pedophile’s “Pleasure Flights” Comes Out… Hillary Camp Horrified

We’ve known about former president Bill Clinton’s connection with billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein for quite some time now, but it now looks like that connection is far worse than ever imagined.

Much worse, if fact. Flight records obtained by Fox News indicate that Clinton took 26 trips aboard the convicted sex offender’s jet — and even ditched his Secret Service for at least five of those flights.

Epstein spent 13 months in prison and under house arrest after being convicted of soliciting minors for prostitution.

It had already been reported that Clinton took flights aboard Epstein’s “Lolita Express” on 11 occasions, which was bad enough.

Clinton flew aboard the billionaire’s Boeing 757 to such destinations as Belgium, Brunei, China, Hong Kong, Japan, London, Singapore and Africa with fellow passengers identified on manifests by only their initials or first names, like “Tatiana.”

Conchita Sarnoff, with the non-profit Alliance to Rescue Victims of Trafficking and author of a book about the Epstein case called “TrafficKing,” said Epstein was known within his inner circles as a pedophile, and that made her wonder why a former president would ever choose to associate with him.

That’s a great question, and its answer should be something Democrat presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton should be afraid of because it further implicates her enabling of her husband’s bad behavior. The fact that Hillary turned a blind eye to Bill’s cavorting around the world with a pedophile only makes her “fight” for women seem like nothing but empty words spoken to win votes.

That wouldn’t be a first for a liberal, but it’s especially damning for Hillary who has had a hard time trying to outrun Bill’s past with women.

A spokesperson for Clinton did not return emails requesting comments about Bill’s travels with Epstein.

That’s not unexpected, but when the Clintons try to keep this mess quiet, it simply reflects on Bill’s dark and embarrassing past with women — and possibly underage girls.

http://conservativetribune.com/bill-clinton-pedophiles-hillary/

Would love to see Bernie bring THIS up during the debates.

However the guberment-controlled mainstream media wouldn't allow it to be brought up, or televised.

Hilldebeast has been an unconvicted felon for decades.....why would you start to expect integrity from her now?

[salute]

MObama's gonna get involved..??

And I heard Obama's birth certificate is fake.



That's what I heard.....

Oh the irony within the US political theater and following the Clintons.

Yes, the one-time Clinton-hounding special prosecutor into philandering Bill's adultery and lying, Kenneth Starr, is under investigation into Baylor University’s repeated mishandling of sexual assault cases while serving as President and Chancellor of the college? All after Starr recently endorsed Bill for Hilldog's campaign!

You just can't make this stuff up! It's funnier than the Sunday comics.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2016/05/24/baylor_reportedly_fired_president_and_chancellor_kenneth_starr_it_needs.html

Wonder if Kenneth Starr will be the next to fall into an untimely accident or commit suicide as is so common in the Clinton's dark history? Or will the Clinton's sign him on as an employee of their "charity"?

Oh the hypocrisy. It's enough to make your head spin! Is Sandusky or Jared from Subway going to be the next to endorse the Clintons?

State Department audit faults Clinton on email use
Published May 25, 2016 Associated Press

A State Department audit has faulted Hillary Clinton and previous secretaries of state for poorly managing email and other computer information and slowly responding to new cybersecurity risks.

The Associated Press obtained a copy of the report by the agency's inspector general Wednesday.

It cites "longstanding, systemic weaknesses" related to communications. These started before Clinton's appointment as secretary of state, but her failures were singled out as more serious.

The review came after revelations Clinton exclusively used a private email account and server while in office. Clinton is now the likely Democratic presidential nominee.

The 78-page report says the department and its secretaries were "slow to recognize and to manage effectively the legal requirements and cybersecurity risks associated with electronic data communications, particularly as those risks pertain to its most senior leadership."

Film at 11....




Sounds to me like she gonna use the 'Ignorance IS an Excuse' and 'Somebody else did it First' defense.....

There should be outrage....

With the amount of dirt that there is, and continues to be, on the Clintons this could easily be the new 100,000 thread.

its all just propaganda from the bigoted and misogynistic right

hilary and slick willy are juss normal folk like you and me

Actually, she's out in California at a rally- not too far from our supertroll.

And the Donald invited them to his wedding.