victor809 wrote:Hahahhahaha...
Ohhhh you "got " me there .
You do realize that any time we are talking about an election it is understood that it refers to voters... right?
But not to point out the obvious, but this is the stupidest quibble yet. Because that just makes Alabama look worse. 60+% of Alabama found the idea of veing represented by a pedo* to be more appealing than voting.
*alleged
Guess that settles it, Vicki has spoken. How dare I take your words as intended. Just don’t understand how I misinterpreted your “65% of white women in Alabama voted for” statement.
But you and I know that you have taken this opportunity to push your bigoted views towards the south and make it appear that the entire conservative side of AL was behind Moore. Which was not the case and was the primary reason Moore lost. Don’t guess you noticed the majority of the right did not show up in support of Moore or you ignored it in order to keep beating your drum.
Only reason Moore was in this special election in the first place was that he had less stench on him at the time of the primary than his opponent, Luther Strange. Strange received special appointment by then Gov Bentley to fill the vacant seat left by Sessions. Only problem was Strange then State AG, stiff armed possible ethics actions aimed at Bentley and earned the special appointment. At least that was the perception of the public.
New Gov Ivy enters picture after Bentley resigns and decides there will be a special election which Moore won on the Republican side. If it had been a straight up election, on equal footing, Strange would have won decisively. The stench from his protecting Bentley was too much for him to overcome against Moore. I will point out at the time of this election there were no “pedo” allegations pertaining to Moore. These arose after the fact and did not surface until recently just before this weeks election.
Not that you wanted to know what happened, but now you do.
Fully expect facts to continue to get in your way.