America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by RMAN4443. 266 replies replies.
6 Pages<123456>
So.... no one's gonna post about it?
victor809 Offline
#201 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Hahahhahaha...

Ohhhh you "got " me there .

You do realize that any time we are talking about an election it is understood that it refers to voters... right?

But not to point out the obvious, but this is the stupidest quibble yet. Because that just makes Alabama look worse. 60+% of Alabama found the idea of veing represented by a pedo* to be more appealing than voting.




*alleged
victor809 Offline
#202 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
And before you think you're gonna be smart and catch
something...the 60+% refers to voter turnout of eligible voters. Apparently that needs to be spelled out for some

Speyside Offline
#203 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Relating voters to an election, wow, what an unheard of concept.
tailgater Offline
#204 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
There goes tail.... whining about tw whining about his words he says.....

Ohhhh.... the circle of whine!!!!!!!!


There you go again. Blaming me for your lack of understanding irony.
teedubbya Offline
#205 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Your apology is accepted.
tailgater Offline
#206 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Lol. Is that how you always respond when you realize you were wrong?


How do you type with your hands on your hip and that condescending scowl on your face?

You're a real treat.


Like your girlfriend, you need to look up the term irony.

Then read my multiple "words" that are clearly against Moore.
And then read my one ironic quip that you are firmly embracing as proving I sympathize.
Wait. I'm wrong.
Not embracing. More like grasping. Like the straws of your flimsy argument.


But seriously.
I can see how you stumbled upon your conclusion. But when I tell you that you're wrong and point out why but you insist that you know better than I do what I meant?
THAT'S where the whiny B comment stems from.

teedubbya Offline
#207 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Your apology is once again accepted.

I appreciate that you know you were wrong and have no desire to rub it in your face. I'll just accept your apology and move on. And I'm sorry about your grandpa.
victor809 Offline
#208 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Speyside wrote:
Relating voters to an election, wow, what an unheard of concept.


Shhh....
Don't make burner sad. In his tiny mind only 68% of the white voters voted for moore, but since that's only 40% of voters turned out to vote that means only 26% of white alabamans love pedophiles... he's sure that those other 60% of people who didn't vote would totally not back a pedophile, because he knows this.

HAh



*all numbers grabbed from nearest sources and may be off by a percentage point or 3.
Speyside Offline
#209 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
*alleged inaccuracy.
tailgater Offline
#210 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Your apology is once again accepted.

I appreciate that you know you were wrong and have no desire to rub it in your face. I'll just accept your apology and move on. And I'm sorry about your grandpa.


Like you'd ever pass on an opportunity to rub it in my face...


teedubbya Offline
#211 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
that's hawt
Burner02 Offline
#212 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
victor809 wrote:
Hahahhahaha...

Ohhhh you "got " me there .

You do realize that any time we are talking about an election it is understood that it refers to voters... right?

But not to point out the obvious, but this is the stupidest quibble yet. Because that just makes Alabama look worse. 60+% of Alabama found the idea of veing represented by a pedo* to be more appealing than voting.
*alleged



Guess that settles it, Vicki has spoken. How dare I take your words as intended. Just don’t understand how I misinterpreted your “65% of white women in Alabama voted for” statement.

But you and I know that you have taken this opportunity to push your bigoted views towards the south and make it appear that the entire conservative side of AL was behind Moore. Which was not the case and was the primary reason Moore lost. Don’t guess you noticed the majority of the right did not show up in support of Moore or you ignored it in order to keep beating your drum.

Only reason Moore was in this special election in the first place was that he had less stench on him at the time of the primary than his opponent, Luther Strange. Strange received special appointment by then Gov Bentley to fill the vacant seat left by Sessions. Only problem was Strange then State AG, stiff armed possible ethics actions aimed at Bentley and earned the special appointment. At least that was the perception of the public.

New Gov Ivy enters picture after Bentley resigns and decides there will be a special election which Moore won on the Republican side. If it had been a straight up election, on equal footing, Strange would have won decisively. The stench from his protecting Bentley was too much for him to overcome against Moore. I will point out at the time of this election there were no “pedo” allegations pertaining to Moore. These arose after the fact and did not surface until recently just before this weeks election.

Not that you wanted to know what happened, but now you do.

Fully expect facts to continue to get in your way.




teedubbya Offline
#213 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I know I don't pass the proximity test but Moore's stench goes much deeper and longer than the pedo piece that is absolutely amazing 48-49% of Alabama chose to ignore.
delta1 Offline
#214 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
The 48-49% isn't indicative of what AL is really about, as burner said. Decent cons refused to support Moore, and stayed home. Turnout among GOP voters was super low...while minority/black voter turn out was historically high...

... which indicates this is a one-off. Jones will finish the term, run for re-election, but will lose if the GOP runs someone other than Moore. Wonder if he'll try for the seat again...

AL is still a solid to the core red state, with more decent people than the state has been given credit for...
teedubbya Offline
#215 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Voting results never represent 100% of the state unless there is 100% turnout. And I am aware Moore always runs lower than other republicans in statewide races. But still 48-49% of those that turned out voted for the pedo? Really?


oh yea... and ‹^› ‹(•¿•)› ‹^›
victor809 Offline
#216 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
So... turnout was 40%.
That's higher than expected. But who turned out? And who stayed home? And if you stayed home isn't that just tacit support for a pedo?

So lets look at the last non-presidential senate election. (2014)
This is when Sessions was elected last.
818,090 votes. essentially all for Sessions because no democrat ran against him. That's a case of the other side "staying home".

How does that compare to 2017 election?
jones got 671,151 votes
Moore got 650,436 votes total about 1.3MM

Now... the best you can claim is that about 150K republican voters stayed home. That's not taking into account Republicans who voted democrat (we'll call them "smart") Republicans make up 43% of the exit polled people... 8 percent of those identifying as republican voted for Jones. That's 44k. So you're "abstaining republicans" really comes down to about 100k people... and that's not even taking into account the independents. I can't estimate that breakdown, as the prior election didn't havand they make up 20% (260,000) of the votersI think that's gonna eat away a bit more from your number.

So I'm not sure many republicans stayed home. Unless you want to argue that independents didn't vote for Sessions at all back in 2014. Because in 2017, about 130k independents voted for a republican, and 130k independents voted for a democrat.... some of this is just ballpark/estimation. but it doesn't look like a large number.

More importantly, a lot of democrats came out to the polls. They were motivated to not have a pedo represent their state. Good for them.

But that brings us to our final question. Is it really that impressive to not go and vote when the options are a dem vs a pedo? I mean,I would like to live in a world where a pedo or a nazi on the ticket was sufficient motivation to cause 98.2% of the eligible voters to turnout to vote for the other candidate.

Apparently you think staying home is praiseworthy. Did you get participation trophies for sitting out too?
Burner02 Offline
#217 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
teedubbya wrote:
Voting results never represent 100% of the state unless there is 100% turnout. And I am aware Moore always runs lower than other republicans in statewide races. But still 48-49% of those that turned out voted for the pedo? Really?


oh yea... and ‹^› ‹(•¿•)› ‹^›




Good to see Vicki Lite return to form.



Serious, I have a question for you and Vicki.

Do you two ever get tired of your hummingbird as**s carrying around your alligator mouths?
tailgater Offline
#218 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Voting results never represent 100% of the state unless there is 100% turnout. And I am aware Moore always runs lower than other republicans in statewide races. But still 48-49% of those that turned out voted for the pedo? Really?


oh yea... and ‹^› ‹(•¿•)› ‹^›


Massachusetts kept re-electing a proven murderer.
Over and over and over again.
And America embraced him almost as tightly.

Anyone old enough can remember that Ted Kennedy would likely have been President, were it not for Chappaquiddick.

Could you imagine a similar moniker for Roy Moore?

Point being, the GOP in the deep south does not own partisan blindness. Liberals have been waving that flag for decades.







delta1 Offline
#219 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
yup...which says that more than 650K cons in AL hold Dems in lower regard than pedos...only 8% of GOP that voted crossed over...

Trump has made it OK for cons to vote for sexual predators...as long as there's an R after their names...
tailgater Offline
#220 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
yup...which says that more than 650K cons in AL hold Dems in lower regard than pedos...only 8% of GOP that voted crossed over...

Trump has made it OK for cons to vote for sexual predators...as long as there's an R after their names...


Blaming Trump is the cheap and easy way out.
delta1 Offline
#221 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
tailgater wrote:
Massachusetts kept re-electing a proven murderer.
Over and over and over again.
And America embraced him almost as tightly.

Anyone old enough can remember that Ted Kennedy would likely have been President, were it not for Chappaquiddick.

Could you imagine a similar moniker for Roy Moore?

Point being, the GOP in the deep south does not own partisan blindness. Liberals have been waving that flag for decades.









please cite the case
teedubbya Offline
#222 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Tail I’ve never said one party owns it or is moreso than the other. I’ve actually said the opposite.

But whenever it comes up the other side rushes in with the yea but..... much like you. Because one side dies it is not a get out of jail free card to do the same. Done can’t see that.

Burner I’m sorry your pedo guy lost (truly, I think he represents Alabama) but like your cutesie little saying.
teedubbya Offline
#223 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Dies = does but oh well.

Besides I thought Ted Kennedy was a Republican. I saw it on the news and stuff.
victor809 Offline
#224 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Burner02 wrote:


Do you two ever get tired of your hummingbird as**s carrying around your alligator mouths?


I'm not sure what that means...

Is that what senators say to 15 year old girls in Alabama?
Burner02 Offline
#225 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
victor809 wrote:
I'm not sure what that means...



Simply put, it means you and Vickie Lite's mouths are larger than your a***s.



victor809 Offline
#226 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Again... I'm not sure what you're trying to say.

Are you calling me skinny?

I can't think of any instance where having a large azz is supposed to be a good thing, unless you're a dancer in a rap video....

Is this one of those sayings that only makes sense if you grew up drinking leaded water in alabama?
teedubbya Offline
#227 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Dude are you really arguing about the merit of a cutsie lil southern saying with a guy that just voted for a pedophile?

And you think you are smart?

My Mama says that alligators are ornery because they got all them teeth and no toothbrush.
victor809 Offline
#228 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Hehehe... ya... I don't really care about cutsie southern sayings...
victor809 Offline
#229 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Now get back in your corner mini me!
tailgater Offline
#230 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Tail I’ve never said one party owns it or is moreso than the other. I’ve actually said the opposite.

But whenever it comes up the other side rushes in with the yea but..... much like you. Because one side dies it is not a get out of jail free card to do the same. Done can’t see that.

Burner I’m sorry your pedo guy lost (truly, I think he represents Alabama) but like your cutesie little saying.


I got too giddy regarding the clinton ties to the Russian Dossier.
But I'm not sure I've been rushing to conclusions otherwise.
tailgater Offline
#231 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
please cite the case


Seriously?

Mary Jo Kopechne.

Teddy Kennedy drove her into the water, escaped from the wreck, found his way to the ferry, swam across to his hotel room, and told no one the next day until after the police found his car.

Those are the facts.
You can draw your own conclusion.

teedubbya Offline
#232 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
he said he was sorry

never understood how he got away with that let alone was revered by some
RMAN4443 Offline
#233 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
tailgater wrote:
Seriously?

Mary Jo Kopechne.

Teddy Kennedy drove her into the water, escaped from the wreck, found his way to the ferry, swam across to his hotel room, and told no one the next day until after the police found his car.

Those are the facts.
You can draw your own conclusion.


Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns???Think
delta1 Offline
#234 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
doesn't the definition of "proven murderer" include "the people of Massachusetts vs Ted Kennedy," and with a jury pronouncement of "guilty"?


Not saying Teddy was an innocent party in the incident...he was behind the wheel at the time of the accident...and was found guilty of criminal negligence...quite a long way from "proven murderer"
tailgater Offline
#235 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
doesn't the definition of "proven murderer" include "the people of Massachusetts vs Ted Kennedy," and with a jury pronouncement of "guilty"?


Not saying Teddy was an innocent party in the incident...he was behind the wheel at the time of the accident...and was found guilty of criminal negligence...quite a long way from "proven murderer"


I didn't say convicted.

And this isn't a court of law.

The guy killed a girl.

TW would say you sympathize with him.




teedubbya Offline
#236 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
He does sympathize with him. His trying to soften it. Teddy killed that chick and got away with it. And some still hold him up high. They shouldn’t and no one should minimize what he did. Dispicable.
tailgater Offline
#237 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
The view is both high AND mighty from that fence post.

teedubbya Offline
#238 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I just agree with you on teddy. I’ve never understood how he could do what he did and survive politically let alone thrive and be held in such high regard. I’m surprised you take issue with that.
ZRX1200 Offline
#239 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
Democrat associated with "Camelot" post book depository.

That's how.
delta1 Offline
#240 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
Maybe there was a depository of empathy for him and his family because his two brothers were actually publicly murdered/intentionally killed?


Not being too nit-picky, but the definition of murderer includes intent...some sort of pre-meditation, does it not?

"Killer" would be an accurate adjective...


The cons have used the "these things happened 40 years ago" as a way to justify backing Moore. Chappaquiddick happened how many years ago?
delta1 Offline
#241 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
Just reviewed the Chappaquiddick incident...Teddy f'ed up royally, he could've done more to save Mary Jo's life, his explanation makes no sense and he should've been charged with negligent manslaughter.
teedubbya Offline
#242 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
1st degree murder involves premeditation and intent. Other degrees less so. But you are right, man slaughter is prolly more fitting.
tailgater Offline
#243 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Manslaughter?
But that dame was a broad.





delta1 Offline
#244 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
Broadslaughter or dameslaughter doesn't roll off the tongue like manslaughter...

besides...I think when that term was invented, it was perfectly legit to kill women...they being property and all...that's what I heard...
tailgater Offline
#245 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Maybe they deserved it?

Ouch!


(preemptive exclamation in case my wife reads this...)


Burner02 Offline
#246 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Think Teddy o' boy plead guilty to leaving the scene of an accident and causing bodily harm to another.

Back then it should have been manslaughter at a minimum.


frankj1 Offline
#247 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
can't believe I'm saying this, but there was a lot of talk that she was pregnant with Teddy's spawn*


*used with permission from MrJones
tailgater Offline
#248 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Just don't say "fetus"...
teedubbya Offline
#249 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The prohibited word list is crazy. I’m surprised someone went public though.
tailgater Offline
#250 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
The prohibited word list is crazy. I’m surprised someone went public though.


I don't believe there is a list. The department of Health and Human Services has denied it.
Which means nothing, except that the list of banned words is ridiculous and would achieve nothing.
This smells too much like a media feeding frenzy ready to believe anything negative about this administration.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
6 Pages<123456>