bgz wrote:You act like he's in your weight class.
Heh...
Regardless of his capabilities, someone needs to point out that a site like icr isn't doing "peer reviewed" research. Or they are, but their peers aren't actual scientists....
For fun, I figured I'd check out where these "peer reviewed" research papers were being published....
-In A. A. Snelling (Ed.) (2008). Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Creationism (pp. 87-98). Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship and Dallas, TX: Institute for Creation Research.
- For presentation to the Evangelical Theological Society, Southwest Regional Meeting, March 24, 2007, 9 a.m., at the Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Fort Worth, Texas.
- RATE II: Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth: Results of a Young-Earth Creationist Research Initiative, (Volume II), L. Vardiman et al., eds. (San Diego, CA: Institute for Creation Research and the Creation Research Society, 2005)
- Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal, volume 14, number 2, 2000, pp. 99-122.
- Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Creationism Pittsburgh, PA, August 3-8, 1998
- n M. Horstemeyer, ed., 2013, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Creationism, Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship. Visit the ICC at www.creationicc.org.
This is a pet peeve of mine... claiming crap like that is on equal footing to actual research