America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 3 hours ago by Brewha. 1211 replies replies.
25 Pages«<5678910111213>»
Electric vehicles - what does the future hold?
frankj1 Offline
#401 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
plinytheelder wrote:
My only comment on this whole topic is:

Are you going to tell us that the development of the ICE hasn't happened? Of course it has, for over 100 years. Imagine how far electric cars would be if THEY had gone through a 100 years of development. Look how far battery technology has gotten in a short time...

Unless, you believe that the inventors of the last century had all the answers and there is no way to improve on what they did. On that, I believe a better way to power a car exists, and will be developed and put the entire discussion to rest.

yup
DrafterX Offline
#402 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Cars have been around since the mesozoics.. Mellow
Speyside2 Offline
#403 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,387
So have you!
deadeyedick Offline
#404 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,097
plinytheelder wrote:
My only comment on this whole topic is:

Are you going to tell us that the development of the ICE hasn't happened? Of course it has, for over 100 years. Imagine how far electric cars would be if THEY had gone through a 100 years of development. Look how far battery technology has gotten in a short time...

Unless, you believe that the inventors of the last century had all the answers and there is no way to improve on what they did. On that, I believe a better way to power a car exists, and will be developed and put the entire discussion to rest.


This is exactly correct. Seems most of the arguments against electric are to justify our own polluting lifestyles. The Teslas of today will be like the Model T was to ICE in future years.

I'm sure we won't be able to do without oil in our lifetime but we sure need to try.
tonygraz Offline
#405 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,260
Speyside2 wrote:
So have you!


but you are older and complain more.
burning_sticks Offline
#406 Posted:
Joined: 08-17-2020
Posts: 152
deadeyedick wrote:
This is exactly correct. Seems most of the arguments against electric are to justify our own polluting lifestyles. The Teslas of today will be like the Model T was to ICE in future years.

I'm sure we won't be able to do without oil in our lifetime but we sure need to try.

The government didn't have to mandate or bribe you to get a Model T. Consumers wanted it and it was cheap enough most could afford it.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#407 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
burning_sticks wrote:
The government didn't have to mandate or bribe you to get a Model T. Consumers wanted it and it was cheap enough most could afford it.



AND Henry Ford's workers earned a real living wage not built from slave labor.
HockeyDad Offline
#408 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
“Slaves need work too.” ~ LeBron James
Brewha Offline
#409 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
deadeyedick wrote:
This is exactly correct. Seems most of the arguments against electric are to justify our own polluting lifestyles. The Teslas of today will be like the Model T was to ICE in future years.

I'm sure we won't be able to do without oil in our lifetime but we sure need to try.


100% on this.

The Model 3 and Y have the crap engineered out of them to be cheap to produce. As the cost of battery's drop this will be even more apparent. Just look in side these things - there's nothing in them. And with the new chassis casting processes they have fewer and fewer parts with each revision. They put the value in the software and consistently upgrade it for free.

Since I took delivery 6 months ago, the updates included:
View cabin camera from your phone
Seat heat controls on the main screen - fully automation mode
Apple Music
Dog mode improvements
myQ connected garage
Zoom meetings
Assorted games
Bluetooth gaming controllers
Auto turn signals
Scheduled light shows
Remote door opening
Turn signal pop up cameras
Blended regen
New energy app
NOT TO MENTION - outdoor fart mode.




And we will be using petrochemical long after we stop burning gas.
HockeyDad Offline
#410 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
I recently heard Tesla described as a “software company that sells stock.”
tonygraz Offline
#411 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,260
I see a tesla or several everytime I drive anywhere lately.
Speyside2 Offline
#412 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,387
Lucid is far better than Tesla, and far more expensive. 2 different business models.
Brewha Offline
#413 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
The advantage Tesla has over legacy makers is they have designed from the ground up with a central, updatable control system.

About the only “button” the driver has is (Federally Mandated - OMG!!!) emergency flashers. That sounds bad, but it is cheaper and works better. The heated seats automatically give you three bacons when you get in and it is cold. They dial up and down through your trip, and you never have to look for the controls - which are on the screen in front of you any way. Everything works like that - wipers, high/low beams, the garage door opener…

Automatic, integrated, voice override everything. Try telling your car to set the temp to 70 - the voice system is prolly not integrated with the HVAC. Tesla are the iPad of cars.

You can turn on the HVAC while you are getting off the plane because the car has a cellular connection just like your phone.



Ford, GM, etc. still make latency designs for their EVs. Buttons, knobs and switches everywhere - not much automation.
Is 16 buttons on your steering wheel too many??
Brewha Offline
#414 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
Speyside2 wrote:
Lucid is far better than Tesla, and far more expensive. 2 different business models.

Better is a relative term.

Lucid is more luxurious, longer range, arguably nicer looking.

Teslas are faster, more efficient, and affordable.

But I could swap my model 3 for an Air - if it weren’t 3 times the price…..
Lucids are super nice though.
rockmiesterr Offline
#415 Posted:
Joined: 01-15-2023
Posts: 17


86 Chevy Silverado ....454BB ..4sp std .4x4....3in body lift.......yyyeeeeeep....yer talkin.......

I gots 2 12v batteries in er........if that helps to support the battry makers;}}
Speyside2 Offline
#416 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,387
Lucid Air Sapphire, 0 to 60 under 2 seconds, 1,200 hp.
frankj1 Offline
#417 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
Speyside2 wrote:
Lucid Air Sapphire, 0 to 60 under 2 seconds, 1,200 hp.

not better if The Lovely Caren was behind the wheel
DrMaddVibe Offline
#418 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
Like other articles and opinions posted here before...a little proof to back them up.


Without Subsidies, How Many People Will Buy An EV?



Sales in Germany plunge after subsidies were reduced...


The Wall Street Journal reports Germans Think Twice About Electric Vehicles

Sales of fully electric vehicles (EVs) fell 13.2% in January compared to January 2022, Germany’s Motor Transport Authority reports. Sales of hybrids declined 6.2%. This compares to an increase of 3.5% in the number of new gasoline-powered cars sold, and a modest decline of 1.2% for diesel.

The main explanation is the end of Berlin’s subsidies for EVs and hybrids at the new year. Until December the subsidy had offered up to €9,000 split between consumer and producer for EVs with a net list price below €40,000. Hybrids in that price range received €6,750. Berlin has ditched the subsidy for hybrids entirely, and cut the payout to €4,500 for EVs below €40,000.

This year will thus be a market test for electric vehicle demand in the Vatican of climate-change belief. Politicians in the West have used subsidies and mandates to drive EV sales, no matter that they aren’t as green as their advertising. The cars are only as carbon-friendly to operate as the power grids they refuel from, and Berlin’s refusal to embrace nuclear power means Germany is burning more coal to cover for the end of natural-gas imports from Russia. Then there’s the environmental cost of mining for all that cobalt, copper and lithium for EVs and their batteries.

If consumers want to buy EVs, go for it. But what does it say about their appeal if people need subsidies to buy them?

Can the Power Grid Handle a Wave of New Electric Vehicles?

Also consider the question Can the Power Grid Handle a Wave of New Electric Vehicles?

Experts believe EVs will make up a third or even half of all light vehicles sold annually in the U.S. by 2030, up from about 7% in 2022.

If those predictions are correct, that leaves a big question: Will the power grid be capable of charging the batteries in those tens of millions of vehicles?

Some grid operators already are struggling to keep up with demand in certain areas and at certain times—California power authorities, for example, asked residents to avoid charging electric cars in the evening during a heat wave last September to help avoid overloading the grid, while utility officials in other areas have warned at times of possible rolling blackouts to prevent system collapses.

First, the good news: Many experts think the utility industry will be ready to generate enough power for the coming EV wave, thanks to planned capacity increases costing hundreds of billions of dollars.

But that isn’t the whole story. The potential for much more serious bottlenecks looms in the local legs of the grid that transmit electricity to individual homes and businesses. Expensive upgrades could be needed for these neighborhood power-distribution systems. Additional spending will be needed to bolster the wires and transformers serving commercial sites as electric trucks and delivery vans become common.

Combined, all these investments likely would result in higher electric rates, many industry analysts say. “The more they invest in the grid, the more those costs go back to consumers,” says Brad Stansberry, U.S. energy advisory leader at audit and consulting firm KPMG.

Let that last sentence paragraph in. Utilities will have to spend a lot of money to add capacity. It will cost even more if the capacity is a clean energy input source.

Cleaner energy will eventually come from solar, but how do we get that energy to Chicago? At what price?

I still wonder how the heck an evacuation of Florida happens when everyone needs to drive hundreds of miles to escape a hurricane.

Are you convinced we have enough lithium, nickel, and other materials to make enough batteries? I am not. The more EVs we do build, the more metals we need. At what cost, and at how much pollution mining them?
Distance and Convenience

For me, it's all about distance and convenience.

It's convenient to charge at home, provided you don't go anywhere. I dive long distances and to the middle of nowhere frequently.

It is not so convenient to have to stop whatever you are doing to charge a vehicle (assuming you can find a charger in the middle of nowhere) or to rent a car if you want to drive five hours straight.
EV Sales Spiked in California

For a different take, Wolf Street reports EV Sales Spiked in California. First Uptick in Electricity Sales after 13 Years of Decline

But what about subsidies and the extraordinarily high price of gasoline in California?

https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/without-subsidies-how-many-people-will-buy-ev
RayR Offline
#419 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,892
Do you mean to say that without economic fascist policies, EV's aren't as attractive an option to consumers?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#420 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
RayR wrote:
Do you mean to say that without economic fascist policies, EV's aren't as attractive an option to consumers?



NEIN!
Brewha Offline
#421 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Like other articles and opinions posted here before...a little proof to back them up.


Without Subsidies, How Many People Will Buy An EV?


This is obviously some strange new usage of the word "proof" that I'm not familiar with.

And whomever wrote it seems to have far more questions than answers....
DrMaddVibe Offline
#422 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
Brewha wrote:
This is obviously some strange new usage of the word "proof" that I'm not familiar with.

And whomever wrote it seems to have far more questions than answers....


Take it up with the Germany Motor Transport Authority.
Brewha Offline
#423 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Take it up with the Germany Motor Transport Authority.

I did - they said you were full of schnitzel.
Brewha Offline
#424 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
The Detroit News:


Ford details $3.5 billion electric vehicle battery plant to be built in Marshall


Ford Motor Co. signaled Monday that Michigan will play a central role in the Dearborn automaker's bid to secure its electric-vehicle supply chain and diversify its battery technologies.

The Blue Oval confirmed plans to invest $3.5 billion to build the first automaker-backed lithium iron phosphate battery plant in the United States. Ford is doing so with Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., or CATL, under a licensing agreement with the China-based company, the world's leading battery manufacturer.

The venture, slated to come online in 2026, will initially create 2,500 jobs. The plant, as The Detroit News previously reported, will be built on the Marshall Megasite in Calhoun County and will be called BlueOval Battery Park Michigan. It would be part of a wholly-owned Ford subsidiary and could be expanded in the future.




Did someone NOT tell Ford people don’t want EV’s?

Note: LFP batteries…..Hmmmmm….smart.
Brewha Offline
#425 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182

Another inconvenient truth about EV’s:

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/02/electric-vehicle-tesla-ford-f-150-expensive-cars/673024/
delta1 Offline
#426 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
RayR wrote:
Do you mean to say that without economic fascist policies, EV's aren't as attractive an option to consumers?



the oil and gas industry has enjoyed economic fascist policies for more than a century...

https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/restore-clean-energy-incentives-big-oil-FS.pdf
DrMaddVibe Offline
#427 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
Brewha wrote:
The Detroit News:


Ford details $3.5 billion electric vehicle battery plant to be built in Marshall


Ford Motor Co. signaled Monday that Michigan will play a central role in the Dearborn automaker's bid to secure its electric-vehicle supply chain and diversify its battery technologies.

The Blue Oval confirmed plans to invest $3.5 billion to build the first automaker-backed lithium iron phosphate battery plant in the United States. Ford is doing so with Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., or CATL, under a licensing agreement with the China-based company, the world's leading battery manufacturer.

The venture, slated to come online in 2026, will initially create 2,500 jobs. The plant, as The Detroit News previously reported, will be built on the Marshall Megasite in Calhoun County and will be called BlueOval Battery Park Michigan. It would be part of a wholly-owned Ford subsidiary and could be expanded in the future.




Did someone NOT tell Ford people don’t want EV’s?

Note: LFP batteries…..Hmmmmm….smart.


Frying pan Frying pan Frying pan

You'll buy anything to peddle your fart car.

Tell that to the people that are getting laid off at Ford!

https://news.yahoo.com/ford-plans-lay-off-8-230054227.html

Pass the chopsticks!
RayR Offline
#428 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,892
delta1 wrote:
the oil and gas industry has enjoyed economic fascist policies for more than a century...

https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/restore-clean-energy-incentives-big-oil-FS.pdf


Thank you DELTA, it's not a debate without the propaganda of LEFTY CLIMATE CRISIS CRAZIES who have no discernable consistent principles as to what is right and what is wrong.
So they are not principled anti-fascists, they are only against economic fascist policies for stuff they don't like?
Yes, I've read some of their other articles.

Speyside2 Offline
#429 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,387
There is climate change, there is climate pollution. How detrimental is climate change? I guess that is dependant on what becomes your POV. As long as India, and China have no intention of lowering their climate pollution, climate pollution will remain high.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#430 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
Ford Sinks After Halting Production, Shipments Of Electric F-150 On 'Battery Issues'



With Tesla stock soaring (and price cuts already hurting competitors' margins), Ford shares are sliding afte rthe carmaker announced that it has paused production and shipments of its electric F-150 Lightning pickup due to a potential battery issue.

As CNBC reports, the EV truck is being closely watched by investors, as it’s the first mainstream electric pickup on the market and a major launch for Ford.

The production halt adds to ongoing “execution issues” detailed to investors earlier this month by Ford CEO Jim Farley.

Ford stock price is fading on the headline...

Ford has not established a timeline for when production and the shipments will resume, Ford spokesperson Emma Bergg said.

“The team is diligently working on the root cause analysis,” Bergg said, adding the company is “doing the right thing by our customers” to resolve any potential issues before resuming production and shipments.

Bergg said the company is unaware of any incidents or issues associated with the potential battery issue. There is no stop-sale for vehicles already on dealer lots, meaning dealers can continue to sell vehicles they already have on hand.

The halt in production and shipments was first reported Tuesday by Motor Authority.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/ford-sinks-after-halting-production-shipments-electric-f-150-battery-issues
delta1 Offline
#431 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
RayR wrote:
Thank you DELTA, it's not a debate without the propaganda of LEFTY CLIMATE CRISIS CRAZIES who have no discernable consistent principles as to what is right and what is wrong.
So they are not principled anti-fascists, they are only against economic fascist policies for stuff they don't like?
Yes, I've read some of their other articles.



your chose the adjectives...

government subsidy is government subsidy...

and the oil industry has been given a whole bunch for a long time, despite remarkable profits for the duration...


and like other environmentally destructive industries before it, you and I and our fellow taxpayers will be on the hook for all the costs of clean-up once the business stops being profitable and the companies file for bankruptcy...we may both be young enough to see that day


but I digress....apologies to Ram, for letting myself be goaded in, close to the edge of "politics" here on neutral ground...I've been trying to avoid getting drawn in by political diatribes
HockeyDad Offline
#432 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
When you realize how important oil and gas is to the building, operating, and defending the United States you realize why the industry receives certain subsidies to do certain things that are in the government’s interests.

Note that there is no Strategic Lithium Reserve.
Speyside2 Offline
#433 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,387
Psychiatrists hold the Stategic Lithium Reserve.
BuckyB93 Offline
#434 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,194
We should start to bottle up sunshine and wind and hold it in underground caverns for strategic green energy reserves.

Put some huge sails and solar panels on tanks, MRAPs, war ships and stuff, then unbottle the green energy when we are called upon for another "peace keeping" war or humanity/disaster relief campaigns.
deadeyedick Offline
#435 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,097
HockeyDad wrote:
When you realize how important oil and gas is to the building, operating, and defending the United States you realize why the industry receives certain subsidies to do certain things that are in the government’s interests.

Note that there is no Strategic Lithium Reserve.


*SMIRK*

~The Chicoms
Brewha Offline
#436 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
Speyside2 wrote:
There is climate change, there is climate pollution. How detrimental is climate change? I guess that is dependant on what becomes your POV. As long as India, and China have no intention of lowering their climate pollution, climate pollution will remain high.


China leads the world in both battery and EV production. China already has an estimated 54 million “green jobs”, with over 4 million jobs in renewable energy. China has also announced that it will no longer build coal-fired power plants abroad and will step up support for other countries in developing green and low-carbon energy. We are behind them.

India is Thursday's child.
Speyside2 Offline
#437 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,387
China is the largest CO2 polluter in the world. We are second. India is third. Look it up, it is easy to find.
Stogie1020 Offline
#438 Posted:
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,341
Speyside2 wrote:
China is the largest CO2 polluter in the world. We are second. India is third. Look it up, it is easy to find.

Don't let your fact get in brewha's mind-delusional way. I mean, he thinks we are "behind" China...
Brewha Offline
#439 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
Speyside2 wrote:
China is the largest CO2 polluter in the world. We are second. India is third. Look it up, it is easy to find.


No doubt. People I work with go over there and the air is unbelievably bad - cause of pollution. So their peep is motivated.
At least the are steering the car in the right direction....
Brewha Offline
#440 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
Stogie1020 wrote:
Don't let your fact get in brewha's mind-delusional way. I mean, he thinks we are "behind" China...


China is ahead of us in EV and battery production - look it up.

But if it makes you feel better, from our perspective they are under us - at least on the globe...
RayR Offline
#441 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,892
Brewha should move to China. He sounds like a Chicom fanboy.
Stogie1020 Offline
#442 Posted:
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,341
Brewha wrote:
China is ahead of us in EV and battery production - look it up.

But if it makes you feel better, from our perspective they are under us - at least on the globe...

I am sure you wrote a letter to the white house demanding Biden rescind his 20 year ban on mining rare earth minerals in the Duluth Complex, right? I mean, if we are behind China, let's catch up, no?
Abrignac Offline
#443 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
Brewha wrote:
China leads the world in both battery and EV production. China already has an estimated 54 million “green jobs”, with over 4 million jobs in renewable energy. China has also announced that it will no longer build coal-fired power plants abroad and will step up support for other countries in developing green and low-carbon energy. We are behind them.

India is Thursday's child.


Seems China can’t count Covid deaths accurately. How accurate is the 54M number?
RayR Offline
#444 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,892
delta1 wrote:
your chose the adjectives...

government subsidy is government subsidy...

and the oil industry has been given a whole bunch for a long time, despite remarkable profits for the duration...


and like other environmentally destructive industries before it, you and I and our fellow taxpayers will be on the hook for all the costs of clean-up once the business stops being profitable and the companies file for bankruptcy...we may both be young enough to see that day


but I digress....apologies to Ram, for letting myself be goaded in, close to the edge of "politics" here on neutral ground...I've been trying to avoid getting drawn in by political diatribes


So in other words you are a fan of economic fascism like those NRDC people of yours? You have swallowed the propaganda that politically correct government subsidies and tax breaks are investments in the future. (that sounds like Biden, and of course, he's an idjut)

I got news for you, the most environmentally and economically destructive entity is/are progressive governments and you and your fellow taxpayers are already on the hook. Of course, progressive governments don't have to worry about such mundane things as profits because their business model or lack of one is based only on grand larceny and fraud writ large. Will we live to see the day when they finally default on their debts and declare insolvency? Or will all the ensuing devastation be their gift to the children?
Brewha Offline
#445 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
Stogie1020 wrote:
I am sure you wrote a letter to the white house demanding Biden rescind his 20 year ban on mining rare earth minerals in the Duluth Complex, right? I mean, if we are behind China, let's catch up, no?


This is not the political forum - noob...
Brewha Offline
#446 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
Abrignac wrote:
Seems China can’t count Covid deaths accurately. How accurate is the 54M number?


As we have demonstrated here, there is no source that can provide numbers that can be trusted.

YMMV
Brewha Offline
#447 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
More government mandated coming.

And if you ever tried to use an Electrify America (VW) you will love it.

https://electrek.co/2023/02/15/sick-of-ev-chargers-not-working-heres-how-thats-going-to-change/
Brewha Offline
#448 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
Looks like Ford has a new patent for those who like trucks and off roading; the live axle:

https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1138761_ford-patents-solid-axle-hub-motor-combo-with-ev-off-roading-in-mind
HockeyDad Offline
#449 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
Brewha wrote:
More government mandated coming.

And if you ever tried to use an Electrify America (VW) you will love it.

https://electrek.co/2023/02/15/sick-of-ev-chargers-not-working-heres-how-thats-going-to-change/


Sick of EV chargers not working? Wait…that’s a thing?


“The Biden administration today announced that the US government is going to set standards for federally funded EV chargers – a US first. In other words, if an EV charger is installed using federal dollars, then it has to actually work, and to a high standard.”


Well this should fix the problem.
Brewha Offline
#450 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
HockeyDad wrote:
Sick of EV chargers not working? Wait…that’s a thing?


“The Biden administration today announced that the US government is going to set standards for federally funded EV chargers – a US first. In other words, if an EV charger is installed using federal dollars, then it has to actually work, and to a high standard.”


Well this should fix the problem.



The Electrify America charges built by Volkswagen are nutritiously bad.
Tesla's work like a hose.

Welcome to the twenty first century HD.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
25 Pages«<5678910111213>»