scompay wrote:Hypocrites will always twist the Roe V Wade argument about how abortion is a woman abusing life. When the only argument should be that a woman can only be driven to abortion if her life was violated. Its a gross simpleton backwards mentality that believes women impregnate by themselves and then suffer surgery for recreation. Not to mention I have never seen a woman that could walk away from a child, men do it as if it was second nature.
You so often provide thought provoking posts.
This is not one of them.
"Can only be driven to abortion if her life was violated". What? She chooses to have sex and you say she's violated? Maybe for YOU to have sex with a woman would be a violation, but don't confuse the matter here.
Nobody on these boards ever said that a woman "impregnates herself", yet you're using that as an argument. Why?
And as far as walking away from a child? Men are MUCH worse. You are right. So what is your point? That it's OK for a woman to have an abortion because her gender is typically more kind?
I reluctantly agree that abortion should remain legal.
But I find your seeming enthusiasm towards it to be distasteful.