deadeyedick
8 years ago

but the recovery began around 2009

frankj1 wrote:



It took years of slow recovery to produce a low unemployment that is a major pull for those with entry level skills. The unemployment rate (the fudged numbers the feds provide that does not include those who gave up looking ) were all above 8% from '09-'12.
frankj1
8 years ago

It took years of slow recovery to produce a low unemployment that is a major pull for those with entry level skills. The unemployment rate (the fudged numbers the feds provide that does not include those who gave up looking ) were all above 8% from '09-'12.

deadeyedick wrote:


I meant to add it seemed you actually supported Al's point with your post...I did not really think that was your intent.

Nothing to do with Obama support, but it would be miraculous for any President to pull off a rapid turnaround after 8 years of decline, yet the impetus only grew over the next four...alll the while the facts about immigration in that time period still did not support what many claim.

To clarify, I support legal immigration, it is clearly defined and should be the way if one wishes to stay.
DrafterX
8 years ago
Illegal immigration may have slowed due to fed regs against our corps forcing companies to move down south.. they didn't have to come here to work.. we delivered jobs to them... 😟
frankj1
8 years ago

Illegal immigration may have slowed due to fed regs against our corps forcing companies to move down south.. they didn't have to come here to work.. we delivered jobs to them... 😟

DrafterX wrote:


cool, so we don't need a 300 bil wall!
dstieger
8 years ago

Illegal immigration may have slowed due to fed regs against our corps forcing companies to move down south.. they didn't have to come here to work.. we delivered jobs to them... 😟

DrafterX wrote:




what regs? the ones saying not to hire illegals?

probably not....I forgot that we don't bother to enforce those...why is it that the illegals are the enemy and not the Americans who employ them? If there wasn't any work for them, we probably wouldn't need a wall, either
DrMaddVibe
8 years ago

but the recovery began around 2009

frankj1 wrote:




Oh puhleeze.

The US economy was stagnant then and the Kenyan King's reign and their "revised numbers" proved the economy was in utter shambles. While he was busy bowing and giving money away to "shovel ready" and "green initiatives" (costing the taxpayer even MORE!) and not pursuing Wall Street for their thievery the economy was at best anemic. There was no "recovery".

I suppose using that logic you like to go to a friend's party where you paid for the band, the booze and the gifts and claim you had a good time??? That's what the American taxpayer did. Most of those corporations that got bailouts...still haven't paid them off!
DrMaddVibe
8 years ago

what regs? the ones saying not to hire illegals?

probably not....I forgot that we don't bother to enforce those...why is it that the illegals are the enemy and not the Americans who employ them? If there wasn't any work for them, we probably wouldn't need a wall, either

dstieger wrote:



Should impose a million dollar fine to any company...ANY company...that uses them.

However; our politicians can't be bothered to craft a single page legislation stating that.
RMAN4443
8 years ago

Should impose a million dollar fine to any company...ANY company...that uses them.

However; our politicians can't be bothered to craft a single page legislation stating that.

DrMaddVibe wrote:


Politicians will never sign legislation.......where would they find landscapers, nannies, or household staff without that pool of cheap to employ illegals? 🤐
frankj1
8 years ago

Oh puhleeze.

The US economy was stagnant then and the Kenyan King's reign and their "revised numbers" proved the economy was in utter shambles. While he was busy bowing and giving money away to "shovel ready" and "green initiatives" (costing the taxpayer even MORE!) and not pursuing Wall Street for their thievery the economy was at best anemic. There was no "recovery".

I suppose using that logic you like to go to a friend's party where you paid for the band, the booze and the gifts and claim you had a good time??? That's what the American taxpayer did. Most of those corporations that got bailouts...still haven't paid them off!

DrMaddVibe wrote:


tough for a rabid partisan to admit, but though the economy did not "recover" in that one, first year (an impossibility btw) it indisputably was vastly improved by all measurements when he left office...and is about the same now too.

E. Warren, that unpopular Senator, spearheaded the Wall Street/financing regulations that are now being totally gutted under your guy. Straining, not draining the swamp.

Giant bailouts under Obama were merely a continuation of Bush's policies. Both take blame to nonpartisan viewers.
frankj1
8 years ago

Politicians will never sign legislation.......where would they find landscapers, nannies, or household staff without that pool of cheap to employ illegals? 🤐

RMAN4443 wrote:


nailed it, bruddah.
Cape Cod vacation spots are short again this Summer.
What jobs were the immigrants stealing from us again?
frankj1
8 years ago

Should impose a million dollar fine to any company...ANY company...that uses them.

However; our politicians can't be bothered to craft a single page legislation stating that.

DrMaddVibe wrote:


common ground, Doc!
If our most powerful people would stop undermining our workforce in the name of Holy Profit, no one would want to enter illegally.
tailgater
8 years ago

nailed it, bruddah.
Cape Cod vacation spots are short again this Summer.
What jobs were the immigrants stealing from us again?

frankj1 wrote:



Stop.
Saying.
That.

It's pure BS.

Less work visas means business owners need to actually LOOK for workers.
They're there.
The employers just don't want to compete (ie pay higher wages)


I hate when the Globe and local TV interviews these shop or restaurant owners.
The owners say they "can't find help".
The reality is the owners see minimum wage workers who are afraid to miss a day. They'll put them on 30 hours weekly to avoid benefits. And they'll hire enough of them to get through the summer.
Meanwhile, able bodied residents can't find 40 hour jobs.
Teens. College kids. Teachers with summers off.

I know that the teens are often unreliable.
But again, that comes down to paying people enough to work.

The increased minimum wage has had a bigger effect on these owners.
Funny that the Globe didn't do an article on that...
(rhetorical)



frankj1
8 years ago

Stop.
Saying.
That.

It's pure BS.

Less work visas means business owners need to actually LOOK for workers.
They're there.
The employers just don't want to compete (ie pay higher wages)


I hate when the Globe and local TV interviews these shop or restaurant owners.
The owners say they "can't find help".
The reality is the owners see minimum wage workers who are afraid to miss a day. They'll put them on 30 hours weekly to avoid benefits. And they'll hire enough of them to get through the summer.
Meanwhile, able bodied residents can't find 40 hour jobs.
Teens. College kids. Teachers with summers off.

I know that the teens are often unreliable.
But again, that comes down to paying people enough to work.

The increased minimum wage has had a bigger effect on these owners.
Funny that the Globe didn't do an article on that...
(rhetorical)



tailgater wrote:


I really did know you'd say that.
tailgater
8 years ago
I had just heard a news report about this within about three hours of my daughter coming home after looking for more hours for the summer.

But I'm glad I didn't disappoint you.

🇨🇮
frankj1
8 years ago

I had just heard a news report about this within about three hours of my daughter coming home after looking for more hours for the summer.

But I'm glad I didn't disappoint you.

🇨🇮

tailgater wrote:


I know you know I chuckle even as I spew venom.

I'm out of the loop, last worked as a waiter in 1977. But at that time, we were paid a couple of bucks an hour and were obliged to report tips at least to match minimum wage. But the restaurant owner was under no obligation to pay minimum wage.

If that is still true, and if it is also true for legal seasonal workers, then the employers who are complaining about staffing issues are correct, limits on imported seasonal help is the real problem, and your theory of minimum wage would not hold salt water



see what I did there?
tailgater
8 years ago
Hours
Benefits

2 employees are cheaper than 1.

frankj1
8 years ago
not getting it.
what about wait staff for seasonal restaurants?
Always loved those Irish lasses at the breakfast joint in Wellfleet and the classy Bulgarian waiters at better dinner establishments on The Cape.
Must they get paid minimum or is it still the way I was paid?
DrMaddVibe
8 years ago

tough for a rabid partisan to admit, but though the economy did not "recover" in that one, first year (an impossibility btw) it indisputably was vastly improved by all measurements when he left office...and is about the same now too.

E. Warren, that unpopular Senator, spearheaded the Wall Street/financing regulations that are now being totally gutted under your guy. Straining, not draining the swamp.

Giant bailouts under Obama were merely a continuation of Bush's policies. Both take blame to nonpartisan viewers.

frankj1 wrote:




They kept on revising numbers lower each and every time and sometimes multiple times! Anything to try to show that his policies were having a positive effect. During the entire debacle of giving cash away to corporations I stated that we would be better off giving each and every LEGAL (see how I tied it back?? Gotta give me that one!) American one million US dollars. It would've been a better use of the money.

Warren did nothing to arrest those responsible. The only people that were arrested were small fish. Not ONE Goldman Sachs...not ONE! As for "my guy"...no...it ALL happened here...

http://www.pbs.org/video/frontline-the-warning/ 

The Carpetbagging Clintons.

Could've ALL been avoided...WAAAAY back when using agencies the correct way. Instead everyone still wants to defer to the Federal Reserve like they're an expert. They're the biggest bunch of thieves ever, we were warned about centralized banking by our Founding Fathers. Once again...THEY were right.

As for continuation of Bush's policies...He was going to be "different". Hope and Change. Transparent. Instead we were lied to and most were conned. There were a lot of people that weren't "bamboozled". Tried to warn everyone too. Oh well. He's the only President to make Jimmy Carter appear legitimate. I'll give the Kenyan King that.



DrafterX
8 years ago
I never got my shotgun..!! 😠
tailgater
8 years ago

not getting it.
what about wait staff for seasonal restaurants?
Always loved those Irish lasses at the breakfast joint in Wellfleet and the classy Bulgarian waiters at better dinner establishments on The Cape.
Must they get paid minimum or is it still the way I was paid?

frankj1 wrote:



I'm not anti work visa.
I'm anti owners who complain and blame others for their fiscal woes.

If I owned a seasonal joint I would absolutely want these special visas.
Supply and demand. I can pay less and demand more because there are more people than jobs.

As a father with kids trying to find summer hours in the same job market I DON'T like the seasonal work visas.
My kids have a hard time finding a job that will offer more than 20-25 hours.

There are two sides to the issue, but only one side gets reported by the liberal rags that you read.
And the truth is that there are still thousands of these visas offered. It's just less than in previous years.

We all want our children to grow up with a strong work ethic.
That becomes difficult when the plentiful local economy would rather pay temporary foreigners.

So stop your bellyaching.
If a restaurant can't survive without these visas then they don't deserve to be in business.
Users browsing this topic