There is no question we gave the money.
Revisionist reporting, however, questions whether it was legal, owed to them, a hostage trade, related to military weapons, or tainted with disease ala exploding cigars to Castro....or an underhanded gift to terrorists that illustrates how incompetent we were as negotiators under Okenyan

tailgater wrote:

fixed...you inadvertently left that out...

delta1 wrote:

Still waiting for someone to state why it was a good idea to bail out of the Iran Nuclear Deal. What did we gain?


easy to take pot shots at arguments for staying in...but make the case for backing out...

delta1 wrote:

I hadn't considered that perspective.
It was a bad deal (IMO) but have we gained anything?

It's like a bad haircut.
Shaving it all off isn't always an improvement.

tailgater wrote: