America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by teedubbya. 360 replies replies.
8 Pages«<2345678>
So confederate flag supporters are racist, and don't know history....
jetblasted Offline
#251 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
Here is a photo of the Boston Busing Riots in 1974.

As I previously mentioned, my Dad took a promotion to the area, and we moved from GA to MA. (Thank goodness he got another promotion 10 months later & we moved back below the Mason-Dixon Line).

But moving from GA to MA in the early 70's, with all the civil rights issues just barely passed, the extreme ethnic healings & racial harmony that took place in Atlanta, witnessing the Boston Bus Riots was a shock.

Seeing how the north loved to preach to re south about the former racial divide, was quite telling.

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/01/31/its_time_to_end_busing_in_boston/

Gene363 Offline
#252 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,820
opelmanta1900 wrote:
That you are at a minimum ignorant, but possibly stupid if you deny the link between slavery and the current reality of many black individuals is not an opinion...


I respect your opinion of me as much as your grasp on history.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#253 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
Gene363 wrote:
I respect your opinion of me as much as your grasp on history.

Avoid the issue all you want... You've stated that slavery has had no effect on anyone other than those who were slaves... That's not an opinion any more than believing 1+1=7 is an opinion... It's lunacy because it denies established facts...

By your logic, the holocaust had no effect on the Jews, other than those who lived through and suffered it... Again, lunacy because it denies established facts...

Usually I stay out of these things, and I'm aware I'm coming off as harsh, but I find it disturbing that someone who is able to read and write can hold the opinion you do...

I've heard Germans downplay the severity and far reaching, long last effects of the holocaust and it's sickening... And the way you talk about slavery and the imagined burden today's black community has is equally as sickening to me...
Gene363 Offline
#254 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,820
opelmanta1900 wrote:
Avoid the issue all you want... You've stated that slavery has had no effect on anyone other than those who were slaves... That's not an opinion any more than believing 1+1=7 is an opinion... It's lunacy because it denies established facts...

By your logic, the holocaust had no effect on the Jews, other than those who lived through and suffered it... Again, lunacy because it denies established facts...

Usually I stay out of these things, and I'm aware I'm coming off as harsh, but I find it disturbing that someone who is able to read and write can hold the opinion you do...

I've heard Germans downplay the severity and far reaching, long last effects of the holocaust and it's sickening... And the way you talk about slavery and the imagined burden today's black community has is equally as sickening to me...


Yes, by my logic the Holocaust is a perfect example of how people overcame tragedy and prospered, they didn't let the Holocaust mind F * * k them into perpetual a mindset of victimhood. It still doesn't change history or the facts that the Holocaust happened and it also doesn't prevent them from keeping the memory of that Holocaust alive so it never happens again.

I feeling really generous today, go back and read what I said, not what you think it says.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#255 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
You should be less generous.... I read what you said, understood it, and it's still ignorant thinking...

Out of curiosity, when's the last time you had a black man in your house that you weren't paying to be there?

If a black man came and sat next to you at church would you get up and move?

Do any black people go to your church? Do you know any of them? You should go share this line of thinking with them and see what they think...
HockeyDad Offline
#256 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,135
opelmanta1900 wrote:
You should be less generous.... I read what you said, understood it, and it's still ignorant thinking...

Out of curiosity, when's the last time you had a black man in your house that you weren't paying to be there?

If a black man came and sat next to you at church would you get up and move?

Do any black people go to your church? Do you know any of them? You should go share this line of thinking with them and see what they think...



Racist
jetblasted Offline
#257 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
All this talk about the conduct of union soldiers while in Georgia, I'm reminded of when they went through Carrollton, GA ... (Where I went to West Georgia College), and when union troops visited the fine folks of that town, they not only destroyed all furniture of people's homes, burned several houses, stole all the jewelry, food, provisions, farm equipments and women's clothing. What's odd about this story is that there were so many union soldiers that day in women's dresses, they finally had to be all reprimanded to remove their dresses and then put back on their uniforms.
Thunder.Gerbil Offline
#258 Posted:
Joined: 11-02-2006
Posts: 121,359
jetblasted wrote:
All this talk about the conduct of union soldiers while in Georgia, I'm reminded of when they went through Carrollton, GA ... (Where I went to West Georgia College), and when union troops visited the fine folks of that town, they not only destroyed all furniture of people's homes, burned several houses, stole all the jewelry, food, provisions, farm equipments and women's clothing. What's odd about this story is that there were so many union soldiers that day in women's dresses, they finally had to be all reprimanded to remove their dresses and then put back on their uniforms.


Yeah, those dumb yankee soldiers, wearing dresses out in public like that. They should know better and take a hint from the holy CSA soldiers and only wear the dresses in private.
teedubbya Offline
#259 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Damn Yankees. All the south wanted to do is be friends.
DrafterX Offline
#260 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Axl wrote a song about that.... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#261 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I wonder how many times jet has worn a dress.
Thunder.Gerbil Offline
#262 Posted:
Joined: 11-02-2006
Posts: 121,359
publicly or privately?
Gene363 Offline
#263 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,820
opelmanta1900 wrote:
You should be less generous.... I read what you said, understood it, and it's still ignorant thinking...

Out of curiosity, when's the last time you had a black man in your house that you weren't paying to be there?

If a black man came and sat next to you at church would you get up and move?

Do any black people go to your church? Do you know any of them? You should go share this line of thinking with them and see what they think...


I wish you could see me laughing in your face, you have achieved a new level of asinine assumption.

I am (not) sorry to disappoint your narrow minded bigoted brain, but I don't keep a count of the color of guests in my home. As a matter of fact, I came to my position after discussing this with several black people, most agree and some did not. They were friends, coworkers, and one was my manager at the time.

I must also point out you are again resorting to a personal attack when I do not agree to your failed arguments.

Now, you tell me your answer to the above questions, or is it that, you have no blacks in your area, because they 'chose' not to live there.
victor809 Offline
#264 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
This thread has devolved into two things.

1 - Gene is wrong. Always
2- there's nothing wrong with wearing a dress every now and then. A friend of mine's rugby team does prom dress rugby every year and it looks hilarious.
DrafterX Offline
#265 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Mellow
dstieger Offline
#266 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
victor809 wrote:
This thread has devolved into two things.

1 - Gene is wrong. Always
2- there's nothing wrong with wearing a dress every now and then. A friend of mine's rugby team does prom dress rugby every year and it looks hilarious.


Does he play for the Washington Scandals?

Unclear to me why you continue to feed the gay rugby joke/stereotype here.....doesn't really matter to me, because it does breed some humorous moments....just makes me wonder is all
DrafterX Offline
#267 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
I bet the rugby team has a Brony night too.... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#268 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
dstieger wrote:
Does he play for the Washington Scandals?

Unclear to me why you continue to feed the gay rugby joke/stereotype here.....doesn't really matter to me, because it does breed some humorous moments....just makes me wonder is all


No, a Seattle team.

As an aside. The scandals are a horrible team, formed by a horrible disgusting little creature who has been kicked off multiple teams. In fact, the scandals kicked him off their team after he formed it. I'm sure they're nice people, but they are horrible rugby players. They were formed and initially coached by a guy who literally never learned to tackle and would avoid any actual rugby, even when he did get the occasional time on the field.

More on topic. Because it amuses me. I'm not even sure what stereotype I'm supposed to be feeding.
victor809 Offline
#269 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
I bet the rugby team has a Brony night too.... Mellow


Rugby is a tolerant sport. But nobody likes bronies. nobody.
Abrignac Offline
#270 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
opelmanta1900 wrote:
You should be less generous.... I read what you said, understood it, and it's still ignorant thinking...

Out of curiosity, when's the last time you had a black man in your house that you weren't paying to be there?

If a black man came and sat next to you at church would you get up and move?

Do any black people go to your church? Do you know any of them? You should go share this line of thinking with them and see what they think...


One cannot define a person as being racist or not based solely on whether or not he invites a person of another race to his house. That's knee jerk logic at best.

Anyone who believes racism is going to be reduced by the perpetual victim position is using the same knee jerk logic. I remember a conversation I had a couple years back with a friend of mine at the local. He and I had many a discussion while sitting around smoking our favorites cigars. BTW, my friend is a two time mayor. He is also a black man.

One such discussion we had was that of racism. His concern was that the "do-good whites" and the "media mouth pieces," his words, do more to hurt "black folk" than they help. He said the only way for black folk to be successful is to quit blaming everyone else for their problems and to "stake their own claim". He went on to say that creating enemies of the very people who can help them by blaming them for their own self-created problems is foolish.

His words, not mine.
Mattie B Offline
#271 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2005
Posts: 6,350
Y'all have taugh me something.


I just don't have the stamina to go round and round with y'all.

I've yet to see an opinion change around here. It's like yelling at brick walls.
DrafterX Offline
#272 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
When are you gonna come down
When are you going to land
I should have stayed on the farm
I should have listened to my old man.... Whistle
jetblasted Offline
#273 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
Is rugby tolerant because you tolerate some other guy grabbing you crotch, because he is trying to get your ball ?

Mellow
Burner02 Offline
#274 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
opelmanta1900 wrote:
You should be less generous.... I read what you said, understood it, and it's still ignorant thinking...

Out of curiosity, when's the last time you had a black man in your house that you weren't paying to be there?

If a black man came and sat next to you at church would you get up and move?

Do any black people go to your church? Do you know any of them? You should go share this line of thinking with them and see what they think...





Full of crap



victor809 Offline
#275 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
jetblasted wrote:
Is rugby tolerant because you tolerate some other guy grabbing you crotch, because he is trying to get your ball ?

Mellow


Never tolerate someone stripping you of your ball. They try that, elbow them in the nose.
Gene363 Offline
#276 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,820
Abrignac wrote:
One cannot define a person as being racist or not based solely on whether or not he invites a person of another race to his house. That's knee jerk logic at best.

Anyone who believes racism is going to be reduced by the perpetual victim position is using the same knee jerk logic. I remember a conversation I had a couple years back with a friend of mine at the local. He and I had many a discussion while sitting around smoking our favorites cigars. BTW, my friend is a two time mayor. He is also a black man.

One such discussion we had was that of racism. His concern was that the "do-good whites" and the "media mouth pieces," his words, do more to hurt "black folk" than they help. He said the only way for black folk to be successful is to quit blaming everyone else for their problems and to "stake their own claim". He went on to say that creating enemies of the very people who can help them by blaming them for their own self-created problems is foolish.

His words, not mine.


+1 ThumpUp
Gene363 Offline
#277 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,820
victor809 wrote:
Never tolerate someone stripping you of your ball. They try that, elbow them in the nose.


I agree, so that makes this wrong. Shame on you
tailgater Offline
#278 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
opelmanta1900 wrote:
You should be less generous.... I read what you said, understood it, and it's still ignorant thinking...

Out of curiosity, when's the last time you had a black man in your house that you weren't paying to be there?

If a black man came and sat next to you at church would you get up and move?

Do any black people go to your church? Do you know any of them? You should go share this line of thinking with them and see what they think...


I can't believe you pulled out the "how many black friends" card.

Haven't seen that since junior high.

What's next? You meeting after recess?


frankj1 Offline
#279 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
Abrignac wrote:
One cannot define a person as being racist or not based solely on whether or not he invites a person of another race to his house. That's knee jerk logic at best.

Anyone who believes racism is going to be reduced by the perpetual victim position is using the same knee jerk logic. I remember a conversation I had a couple years back with a friend of mine at the local. He and I had many a discussion while sitting around smoking our favorites cigars. BTW, my friend is a two time mayor. He is also a black man.

One such discussion we had was that of racism. His concern was that the "do-good whites" and the "media mouth pieces," his words, do more to hurt "black folk" than they help. He said the only way for black folk to be successful is to quit blaming everyone else for their problems and to "stake their own claim". He went on to say that creating enemies of the very people who can help them by blaming them for their own self-created problems is foolish.

His words, not mine.

First, good to see ya, hope you feel better.

I am not going to refute the words of your friend, but I am always amused when white people quote "a" person of a minority be it Black, Asian, Gay, whatever...as though it's a statement that speaks for or at the entire race/group.

Try considering this without smiling and nodding..."Hey! I have a white friend who said blah blah blah about what white people need/want"...as though it rings true for all whites.

Whatever quote inserted, it would sound idiotic.
tailgater Offline
#280 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:

I am not going to refute the words of your friend, but I am always amused when white people quote "a" person of a minority be it Black, Asian, Gay, whatever...as though it's a statement that speaks for or at the entire race/group.

Try considering this without smiling and nodding..."Hey! I have a white friend who said blah blah blah about what white people need/want"...as though it rings true for all whites.

Whatever quote inserted, it would sound idiotic.


Huh.
Says you.

frankj1 Offline
#281 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
jetblasted wrote:
Here is a photo of the Boston Busing Riots in 1974.

As I previously mentioned, my Dad took a promotion to the area, and we moved from GA to MA. (Thank goodness he got another promotion 10 months later & we moved back below the Mason-Dixon Line).

But moving from GA to MA in the early 70's, with all the civil rights issues just barely passed, the extreme ethnic healings & racial harmony that took place in Atlanta, witnessing the Boston Bus Riots was a shock.

Seeing how the north loved to preach to re south about the former racial divide, was quite telling.

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/01/31/its_time_to_end_busing_in_boston/


Jet, you were pretty close to the action, about 40 miles west of the real troubled neighborhoods. I lived in the suburbs of Boston (as I do still) and would like to comment on your north/south comparison, indulge me. I admit I did not read your link.

There is no possible justification for the violence that broke out, for the vitriol that spewed forth, for the ugliness that stained the City of Boston...98.2% perpetrated by white citizens. I will not justify any of it, but I may take a stab at defining differences in creating what happened here.

Civil Rights had been the law for a while when a judge (Garrity IIRC) determined that Boston Public Schools were segregated in violation of the law and needed to forcibly be integrated. Everyone from here knew why they were segregated, it was because of the racial make-up of the neighborhoods. How that happened is an interesting story for another time, but for many people, they just wanted to live in ethnic similar areas, with schools they chose to live near. Understandable that families may try to choose the schools to live near.

Regardless of how they were formed, there was a strong Italian section, Irish, Polish etc, and after tons of migration from job seekers leaving the south, Black neighborhoods emerged, with a factor of "white flight" too.

But the black and white schools were far from equal, the Boston School Committee clearly had racist members among the group, and very little was done to improve schools in Black neighborhoods. They were separate, but not even "separate but equal".

So suddenly busing happens, as much to integrate as it was to (hopefully) allow for equal quality education in a system that was still good at the time. The original outcry was not about mixing races at all despite what you may have perceived as a youth. It was about families choosing neighborhoods partly based on local schools and being forced to bus across town. Hell, we moved into an area of my town because we knew the elementary school was superior. It would have been very upsetting to be forced into another, lesser school.

Obviously protests eventually morphed into racial taunting, rocks thrown at buses of black children became the story nationally, and all of it was sickening. But most of the ugliness was well choreographed by organized racist factions. Many other residents, black and white, also opposed forced busing yet supported equal education and would have preferred to work on solving that problem in a fair and peaceful way.

And yet others actually supported forcibly enforcing the law of the land. What they got was a terrible school system left in the wake, with a reverse of the racial make-up.

I guess I am saying it wasn't a culture of racism born of slavery, accepting of the premise of black inferiority in the eyes of God, developed over many generations as in the South that motivated this embarrassment. Rather it began as a protest to losing one's neighborhood school, and hideously was captured by REAL true disgusting violent racists.






frankj1 Offline
#282 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
tailgater wrote:
Huh.
Says you.


See, you get it! And you're a typical New Englander, from what I read.
jetblasted Offline
#283 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
Well frank, it's a famous photo from the protests of a white guy getting ready to impale a black guy with an American Flag. Very strong photo.

Thanks for the history lesson, but to see that happening as a 11 y/o kid from the South was shocking.

Don't get me wrong. I *Love* Boston. After I got on with the airlines, it was always a favorite place to day-trip too. I used to fly up to Logan all the time, just to bring home fresh lobstah for dinner.

Plus, I still have an autograph baseball from the entire '73 Red Sox ...
riverdog Offline
#284 Posted:
Joined: 03-28-2008
Posts: 2,600
frankj1 wrote:
See, you get it! And you're a typical New Englander, from what I read.

Havent ever had the pleasure of a Boston visit, though I do enjoy Dennis Lehanes work. I have driven right by there on the way to Maine numerous times. Now those are true New Englanders! Heheheheh. Keep the rye bottles full for me. I might make it there yet. I'll bring some smokes.
Bitter Klinger Offline
#285 Posted:
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877

Pay close attention to exactly WHO it is calling for removing the dastardly rebel flags - its not the people rioting in Ferguson, and there simply is no rioting in Charleston, if fact they're quite the opposite.

Its the media and politicians - both of which are horrendously corrupt.

Ask yourself who benefits from the division here.
jetblasted Offline
#286 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
I was listening to a local talk radio station the other day on the way to work, and a call-In dude, Brett the truck driver, said it was a reporter from MSNBC that first raised the issue about the flag, but I can't really corroborate that.

riverdog Offline
#287 Posted:
Joined: 03-28-2008
Posts: 2,600
Bitter Klinger wrote:


Ask yourself who benefits from the division here.

Mmmmmmmm, no one, Alex, for the win.
jetblasted Offline
#288 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
frank, funny story about my first year at West Tatnuck Elementary School, they had their own football league in the City for Elementary Schools, which seems odd, but they did.

The day before the first practice I found out it was a touch football league. I had a hard time believing that, and so did my Dad. He said, that can't be right, and since I had already been playing league tackle football for four years with full helmet & pads, he sent me to practice with my football pants with hip, thigh & knee pads. Well, the sight of the new kid from GA in pads about made the other kids piss their pants. The coach was slightly annoyed, too.

Anyway, we wound up winning the city league championship that year.

I also played on a city league street hockey team, and we won the city championship, too.

Oh, and my first love who lived across the street from me was Lisa Cooperman.
tailgater Offline
#289 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
jetblasted wrote:
frank, funny story about my first year at West Tatnuck Elementary School, they had their own football league in the City for Elementary Schools, which seems odd, but they did.

The day before the first practice I found out it was a touch football league. I had a hard time believing that, and so did my Dad. He said, that can't be right, and since I had already been playing league tackle football for four years with full helmet & pads, he sent me to practice with my football pants with hip, thigh & knee pads. Well, the sight of the new kid from GA in pads about made the other kids piss their pants. The coach was slightly annoyed, too.

Anyway, we wound up winning the city league championship that year.

I also played on a city league street hockey team, and we won the city championship, too.

Oh, and my first love who lived across the street from me was Lisa Cooperman.


Tatnuck?
Prove it:
How do you pronounce Worcester?


tailgater Offline
#290 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
See, you get it! And you're a typical New Englander, from what I read.


Yes.
Typical.
That's me in a nut shell...

jetblasted Offline
#291 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
War-chest-ter

Of course. Duh.
tailgater Offline
#292 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
Jet, you were pretty close to the action, about 40 miles west of the real troubled neighborhoods. I lived in the suburbs of Boston (as I do still) and would like to comment on your north/south comparison, indulge me. I admit I did not read your link.

There is no possible justification for the violence that broke out, for the vitriol that spewed forth, for the ugliness that stained the City of Boston...98.2% perpetrated by white citizens. I will not justify any of it, but I may take a stab at defining differences in creating what happened here.

Civil Rights had been the law for a while when a judge (Garrity IIRC) determined that Boston Public Schools were segregated in violation of the law and needed to forcibly be integrated. Everyone from here knew why they were segregated, it was because of the racial make-up of the neighborhoods. How that happened is an interesting story for another time, but for many people, they just wanted to live in ethnic similar areas, with schools they chose to live near. Understandable that families may try to choose the schools to live near.

Regardless of how they were formed, there was a strong Italian section, Irish, Polish etc, and after tons of migration from job seekers leaving the south, Black neighborhoods emerged, with a factor of "white flight" too.

But the black and white schools were far from equal, the Boston School Committee clearly had racist members among the group, and very little was done to improve schools in Black neighborhoods. They were separate, but not even "separate but equal".

So suddenly busing happens, as much to integrate as it was to (hopefully) allow for equal quality education in a system that was still good at the time. The original outcry was not about mixing races at all despite what you may have perceived as a youth. It was about families choosing neighborhoods partly based on local schools and being forced to bus across town. Hell, we moved into an area of my town because we knew the elementary school was superior. It would have been very upsetting to be forced into another, lesser school.

Obviously protests eventually morphed into racial taunting, rocks thrown at buses of black children became the story nationally, and all of it was sickening. But most of the ugliness was well choreographed by organized racist factions. Many other residents, black and white, also opposed forced busing yet supported equal education and would have preferred to work on solving that problem in a fair and peaceful way.

And yet others actually supported forcibly enforcing the law of the land. What they got was a terrible school system left in the wake, with a reverse of the racial make-up.

I guess I am saying it wasn't a culture of racism born of slavery, accepting of the premise of black inferiority in the eyes of God, developed over many generations as in the South that motivated this embarrassment. Rather it began as a protest to losing one's neighborhood school, and hideously was captured by REAL true disgusting violent racists.




Scary how it was first misrepresented in the media, and then how it became reality. But you're spot on.
Humans do gravitate towards the lowest common denominator, and when something as obvious as race is staring you in the face, well...

My business partners grew up in Medford (Meffah to the locals, a northern burb to Boston to those outside NE). They were in a BIG high school. Medford High graduated almost 1,000 kids a year back in the late 70's.
Anyway, they had a friend who got into a scuffle with a black kid. Just a "regular" fight. Two teen boys duking it out.
But it made Time Magazine and pointed fingers that the town was racially divided. Even though there were more problems with those pesky Italians back then, it seemed that Time saw the opportunity to draw conclusions first and then piece together the facts.
Some things never change.


tailgater Offline
#293 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
jetblasted wrote:
War-chest-ter

Of course. Duh.


Nope.

True locals just say Wistah.

And nobody uses three syllables.

Break it into two words:

Worcester
Worce + Ster

Say it fast and drop the R sounds.



jetblasted Offline
#294 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
One thousand one
One thousand two
One thousand three ...

LoL

In 1972, my Dad was sent to work in Boston to help hammer out the deal with Northeast Airlines for the merger with Delta. We saw him three times in 6 months, as a lot of his time was spent helping with a horrible accident Delta had when they landed a DC-8 short of the field & lost everyone onboard.

But, anyway, our house was almost eye level with the airport just a few miles away from ORH ... Otherwise known as ... WUS-TA ... Massachusetts.

Our house was probably less than a mile from West Tatnuck & I walked to school every day. Even through neck deep snow in the winter time.

I did post a very cool photo of our football team championship photo after the last game, on this site many years ago. I have no idea how to find it, but if anyone could, I bet jackconrad can.

Did you go to West Tatnuck, too ??!!!
Gene363 Offline
#295 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,820
Bitter Klinger wrote:
Pay close attention to exactly WHO it is calling for removing the dastardly rebel flags - its not the people rioting in Ferguson, and there simply is no rioting in Charleston, if fact they're quite the opposite.

Its the media and politicians - both of which are horrendously corrupt.

Ask yourself who benefits from the division here.


While appalled by shooting, it was very gratifying to see the reaction in Charleston. I wish the news would have shown more pictures of the crown walking across the Ravenel Bridge.

https://youtu.be/85C5XEv9Atk

frankj1 Offline
#296 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
hey TG, I say Jet gets full credit for WUS-TA.

Jet, I remember that pic you posted.

I also passed on your link cuz I had a feeling it was the flag picture. Might have to research the potential victim (black guy), as I seem to recall he had significance beyond being a potential victim.
frankj1 Offline
#297 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
Gene363 wrote:
While appalled by shooting, it was very gratifying to see the reaction in Charleston. I wish the news would have shown more pictures of the crown walking across the Ravenel Bridge.

https://youtu.be/85C5XEv9Atk


heard excellent coverage of encouraging news about Charleston on public radio last week. Talk of West African slaves brought there because of their expertise growing rice and how they have become part of the fabric of the area...education, politics, all segments of society.

Some talk of handling this current situation for them too. Feeling like they have to actually be better than whites to be considered as good, some great quote about the shooter entering the wrong church in an attempt to ignite a war between the races.

I love American success stories, even if they never intended to come here!
frankj1 Offline
#298 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
riverdog wrote:
Havent ever had the pleasure of a Boston visit, though I do enjoy Dennis Lehanes work. I have driven right by there on the way to Maine numerous times. Now those are true New Englanders! Heheheheh. Keep the rye bottles full for me. I might make it there yet. I'll bring some smokes.

you invited me over, so give me a yell if you are near.
Abrignac Offline
#299 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
frankj1 wrote:
First, good to see ya, hope you feel better.

I am not going to refute the words of your friend, but I am always amused when white people quote "a" person of a minority be it Black, Asian, Gay, whatever...as though it's a statement that speaks for or at the entire race/group.

Try considering this without smiling and nodding..."Hey! I have a white friend who said blah blah blah about what white people need/want"...as though it rings true for all whites.

Whatever quote inserted, it would sound idiotic.


Thanks Frank. I am feeling much better.

I never said he was speaking for an entire race. He was in fact speaking for himself. My point was much simpler. But, if one pays attention to what he said, they will see the wisdom in his words. His point was that as long as a segment of society blames another segment of society then they should not expect that segment of society that they blame to welcome them with open arms. His view was that more progress would be made if those groups work together to improve the quality of life for all. Pretty worldly words from the former mayor of a town of 1225+ residents.

Think of it this way, as long as someone points the finger at someone else, no problem will ever be solved. Not to mention Newton's law regarding actions that cause equal and opposite reactions.
frankj1 Offline
#300 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
OK.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
8 Pages«<2345678>